Advertisement

New discretization of complex analysis: The Euclidean and hyperbolic planes

  • S. P. Novikov
Article

Abstract

Discretization of complex analysis on the plane based on the standard square lattice was started in the 1940s. It was developed by many people and also extended to the surfaces subdivided by the squares. In our opinion, this standard discretization does not preserve well-known remarkable features of the completely integrable system. These features certainly characterize the standard Cauchy continuous complex analysis. They played a key role in the great success of complex analysis in mathematics and applications. Few years ago, jointly with I. Dynnikov, we developed a new discretization of complex analysis (DCA) based on the two-dimensional manifolds with colored black/white triangulation. Especially profound results were obtained for the Euclidean plane with an equilateral triangle lattice. Our approach preserves a lot of features of completely integrable systems. In the present work we develop a DCA theory for the analogs of an equilateral triangle lattice in the hyperbolic plane. This case is much more difficult than the Euclidean one. Many problems (easily solved for the Euclidean plane) have not been solved here yet. Some specific very interesting “dynamical phenomena” appear in this case; for example, description of boundaries of the most fundamental geometric objects (like the round ball) leads to dynamical problems. Mike Boyle from the University of Maryland helped me to use here the methods of symbolic dynamics.

Keywords

Holomorphic Function STEKLOV Institute Complex Analysis Hyperbolic Plane Discrete Analog 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    I. A. Dynnikov and S. P. Novikov, “Geometry of the Triangle Equation on Two-Manifolds,” Moscow Math. J. 3(2), 419–438 (2003).zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Ferrand, “Fonctions preharmoniques et fonctions preholomorphes,” Bull. Sci. Math., Ser. 2, 68, 152–180 (1944).zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. J. Duffin, “Basic Properties of Discrete Analytic Function,” Duke Math. J. 23, 335–363 (1956).zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. P. Novikov, “Discrete Connections and Difference Linear Equations,” Tr. Mat. Inst. im. V.A. Steklova, Ross. Akad. Nauk 247, 186–201 (2004) [Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 247, 168–183 (2004)].Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. I. Bobenko, C. Mercat, and Yu. B. Suris, “Linear and Nonlinear Theories of Discrete Analytic Functions. Integrable Structure and Isomonodromic Green’s Function,” J. Reine Angew. Math. 583, 117–161 (2005).zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. P. Dolbilin, M. A. Shtan’ko, and M. I. Shtogrin, “Cubic Subcomplexes in Regular Lattices,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 291(2), 277–279 (1986) [Sov. Math. Dokl. 34, 467–469 (1987)].MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. P. Dolbilin, A. G. Sedrakyan, M. A. Shtan’ko, and M. I. Shtogrin, “A Topology for the Family of Parametrizations of Two-Dimensional Cycles Arising in the Three-Dimensional IsingModel,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 295(1), 19–23 (1987) [Sov. Math., Dokl. 36 (1), 11–15 (1987)].MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. P. Dolbilin, M. A. Shtan’ko, and M. I. Shtogrin, “The Problem of Parametrization of Cycles Modulo 2 in a Three-Dimensional Cubic Lattice,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Mat. 52(2), 355–377 (1988) [Math. USSR, Izv. 32 (2), 359–383 (1989)].zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. P. Dolbilin, M. A. Shtan’ko, and M. I. Shtogrin, “Quadrillages and Parametrizations of Lattice Cycles,” Tr. Mat. Inst. im. V.A. Steklova, Akad. Nauk SSSR 196, 66–85 (1991) [Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 196, 73–93 (1992)].zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. P. Dolbilin, M. A. Shtan’ko, and M. I. Shtogrin, “Cubic Manifolds in Lattices,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Mat. 58(2), 93–107 (1994) [Russ. Acad. Sci., Izv. Math. 44 (2), 301–313 (1995)].MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. P. Novikov, Topology (Springer, Berlin, 1996), Encycl. Math. Sci. 12: Topology I.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. P. Novikov, “Algebraic Properties of Two-Dimensional Difference Operators,” Usp. Mat. Nauk 52(1), 225–226 (1997) [Russ. Math. Surv. 52, 226–227 (1997)].Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. P. Novikov and I. A. Dynnikov, “Discrete Spectral Symmetries of Low-Dimensional Differential Operators and Difference Operators on Regular Lattices and Two-Dimensional Manifolds,” Usp. Mat. Nauk 52(5), 175–234 (1997) [Russ. Math. Surv. 52, 1057–1116 (1997)].MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. G. Grinevich and R. G. Novikov, “The Cauchy Kernel for the Novikov-Dynnikov DN-Discrete Complex Analysis in Triangular Lattices,” Usp. Mat. Nauk 62(4), 155–156 (2007) [Russ. Math. Surv. 62, 799–801 (2007)].MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Physical Science and Technology, Department of MathematicsUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.Steklov Mathematical InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Landau Institute for Theoretical PhysicsRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations