Self-correspondences of K3 surfaces via moduli of sheaves and arithmetic hyperbolic reflection groups
- 51 Downloads
In a series of our papers with Carlo Madonna (2002–2008), we described self-correspondences of a K3 surface over ℂ via moduli of sheaves with primitive isotropic Mukai vectors for the Picard number 1 or 2 of the K3 surfaces. Here we give a natural and functorial answer to the same problem for an arbitrary Picard number. As an application, we characterize, in terms of self-correspondences via moduli of sheaves, K3 surfaces with reflective Picard lattice, that is, when the automorphism group of the lattice is generated by reflections up to finite index. It is known since 1981 that the number of reflective hyperbolic lattices is finite. We also formulate some natural unsolved related problems.
KeywordsModulus Space Vector Bundle Automorphism Group STEKLOV Institute Integral Action
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.C. Madonna and V. V. Nikulin, “On a Classical Correspondence between K3 Surfaces. II,” in Strings and Geometry: Proc. Clay Math. Inst. 2002 Summer School, Ed. by M. Douglas, J. Gauntlett, and M. Gross (Am. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2004), Clay Math. Proc. 3, pp. 285–300; arXiv:math/0304415 [math.AG].Google Scholar
- 6.S. Mukai, “On the Moduli Space of Bundles on K3 Surfaces. I,” in Vector Bundles on Algebraic Varieties, Bombay, 1984 (Tata Inst. Fund. Res., Bombay, 1987), Tata Inst. Fundam. Res. Stud. Math. 11, pp. 341–413.Google Scholar
- 11.V. V. Nikulin, “Factor Groups of Groups of Automorphisms of Hyperbolic Forms with Respect to Subgroups Generated by 2-Reflections. Algebrogeometric Applications,” in Itogi Nauki Tekh., Ser.: Sovrem. Probl. Mat. (VINITI, Moscow, 1981), Vol. 18, pp. 3–114 [J. Sov. Math. 22, 1401–1475 (1983)].Google Scholar
- 12.V. V. Nikulin, “On Correspondences between K3 Surfaces,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Mat. 51(2), 402–411 (1987) [Math. USSR, Izv. 30, 375–383 (1988)].Google Scholar
- 14.V. V. Nikulin, “On Correspondences of a K3 Surface with Itself. II,” in Algebraic Geometry: Proc. Korea-Japan Conf. in Honor of I. Dolgachev’s 60th Birthday, Seoul, 2004, Ed. by J. H. Keum and S. Kondō (Am. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2007), Contemp. Math. 422, pp. 121–172; arXiv:math/0309348 [math.AG].Google Scholar
- 15.V. V. Nikulin, “Self-correspondences of K3 Surfaces via Moduli of Sheaves,” in Algebra, Arithmetic, and Geometry: In Honor of Yu.I. Manin, Ed. by Yu. Tschinkel and Yu. Zarhin (Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 2009), Vol. 2, Prog. Math. 270, pp. 439–464; arXiv:math/0609233 [math.AG].Google Scholar
- 17.V. V. Nikulin, “Self-correspondences of K3 Surfaces via Moduli of Sheaves and Arithmetic Hyperbolic Reflection Groups,” arXiv: 0810.2945 [math.AG].Google Scholar
- 20.A. N. Tyurin, “Special 0-Cycles on a Polarized K3 Surface,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Mat. 51(1), 131–151 (1987) [Math. USSR, Izv. 30, 123–143 (1988)].Google Scholar
- 21.A. N. Tyurin, “Symplectic Structures on the Varieties of Moduli of Vector Bundles on Algebraic Surfaces with p g > 0,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Mat. 52(4), 813–852 (1988) [Math. USSR, Izv. 33, 139–177 (1989)].Google Scholar
- 24.K. Yoshioka, “Irreducibility of Moduli Spaces of Vector Bundles on K3 Surfaces,” arXiv:math/9907001 [math.AG].Google Scholar