Selection of membranes for deadend micro- and ultrafiltration outside-in hollow fiber filters

  • Yu. S. Polyakov
  • D. A. Kazenin
Article

Abstract

A mathematical model taking into account the adsorption of particles around a membrane pore mouth at the stage of standard blocking is developed. The model is used to study the effect of the average membrane pore size, the cutoff coefficient, and the ratio of the length of the pore inlet region to be blocked to the whole pore length on the product flow rate of a deadend outside-in hollow fiber filter. It is shown that the use of membranes with an average pore size higher than the cutoff diameter for the particles to be removed from the suspension will be profitable only for the first 15–20 min of operation. In this case, the membrane should have an average pore size as large as possible, but not exceeding a limit value at which the membrane selectivity can drop; the cutoff coefficient as low as possible; and a pore inlet region to be blocked as long as possible.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Polyakov, S.V., Maksimov, E.D., and Polyakov, V.S., On the Simulation of One-Dimensional Microfiltration, Teor. Osn. Khim. Tekhnol., 1995, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 357–361.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Polyakov, Yu.S., Maksimov, E.D., and Polyakov, V.S., On the Design of Microfilters, Teor. Osn. Khim. Tekhnol., 1999, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 70–78 [Theor. Found. Chem. Eng. (Engl. Transl.), vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 64–71].Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bowen, W.R., Filippov, A.N., Sharif, A.O., and Starov, V.M., A Model of the Interaction between a Charged Particle and a Pore in a Charged Membrane Surface, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 1999, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 35–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bowen, W.R. and Sharif, A.O., Prediction of Optimum Membrane Design: Pore Entrance Shape and Surface Potential, Colloids Surf. A, 2002, vol. 201, nos. 1–3, pp. 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cherkasov, A.N. and Polotsky, A.E., Critical Particle-to-Pore Size Ratio in Ultrafiltration, J. Membr. Sci., 1995, vol. 106, nos. 1–2, pp. 161–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cheryan, M., Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Handbook, Lancaster: Technomic, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fane, A. and Chang, Sh., Membrane Bioreactors: Design & Operational Options, Filtr. Separat., 2002, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 26–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zeman, L.J. and Zydney, A.L., Microfiltration and Ultrafiltration: Principles and Applications, New York: Marcel Dekker, 1996.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Polyakov, Yu.S. and Kazenin, D.A., Membrane Filtration with Reversible Adsorption: Hollow Fiber Membranes as Collectors of Colloidal Particles, Teor. Osn. Khim. Tekhnol., 2005, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 128–139 [Theor. Found. Chem. Eng. (Engl. Transl.), vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 118–128].Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Polyakov, Yu.S., Membrane Separation in Deadend Hollow Fiber Filters at Constant Transmembrane Pressure, Teor. Osn. Khim. Tekhnol., 2005, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 499–506 [Theor. Found. Chem. Eng. (Engl. Transl.), vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 471–477].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu. S. Polyakov
    • 1
  • D. A. Kazenin
    • 2
  1. 1.USPolyResearchAshlandUSA
  2. 2.Moscow State University of Environmental EngineeringMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations