Advertisement

Solar System Research

, Volume 49, Issue 6, pp 404–409 | Cite as

Features of encounters of small bodies with planets

  • N. Yu. Emel’yanenko
Article

Abstract

A kinematic approach is developed to qualitative analysis of characteristics of a low-speed encounter of a small body with a planet. A classification of encounters of small bodies with planets based on the magnitude of planetocentric speed is proposed. The concept of the points of low-speed quasi-tangency of orbits of small bodies and planets is introduced. Based on this concept, the definitions of the point of minimum planetocentric speed, a quasi-tangent low-velocity segment on the orbit of a small body, low-velocity and high-velocity encounters are formulated. A classification of encounters of small bodies with planets according to the global minimum of the function of planetocentric distance is also proposed. The classification is based on the concepts of the gravity sphere of action and the Hill sphere of the planet. The definitions of an area and duration of low-speed and high-speed encounters are given.

Keywords

small body low-speed encounter quasi-tangency point Hill’s sphere sphere of gravity action 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Belyaev, N.A, Catalogue of Short-Period Comets, Belyaev, N.A., Kresak, L., Pittich, E.M., and Pushkarev, A.N., Eds., Bratislava: Astron Inst. Slovak. Acad. Sci., 1986.Google Scholar
  2. Carusi, A., Kresak, L., and Valsecchi, G.B, Perturbations by Jupiter of a chain of moving in the orbits of Comet Oterma, Astron. Astrophys., 1981, vol. 99, pp. 262–269.ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. Carusi, A. and Valsecchi, G, On the orbital evolution of short-period comets having low-velocity encounters with Jupiter, in Comparative Study of the Planets, Coradini, A. and Fulchignoni, M., Eds., Dordrecht: Reidel, 1982, pp. 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carusi, A., in Long-Term Evolution of Short-Period Comets, Carusi, A., Kresak, L., Perozzi, E., and Valsecchi, G.B., Eds., Rome, 1984.Google Scholar
  5. Emel’yanenko, N.Yu., Comets close approach to the Jupiter, Kometnyi Tsirkulyar, 1984, no. 331, p. 3.Google Scholar
  6. Emel’yanenko, N.Yu., Sort-period comets close approach to the Jupiter, in Sb. Nauchn. trudov LGU. Analiz dvizheniya tel Solnechnoi sistemy i ikh nablyudeniya (Collection of Leningrad State University Scientific Papers. Analysis of Solar System Bodies Motion and Their Observation), Leningrad, 1986, pp. 97–102.Google Scholar
  7. Emel’yanenko, N.Yu., Evolution of the orbits of comets having close approaches to Jupiter. An analysis of the effect of the nonspherical figure of Jupiter, Solar Syst. Res., 1992a, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 447–451.ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. Emel’yanenko, N.Yu., Evolution of the orbits of comets that have close encounters with Jupiter. 3. Influence of the Galilean satellites, Solar Syst. Res., 1992b, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 575–580.ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. Emel’yanenko, N.Yu., The dynamics of cometary orbits in close encounters with Jupiter. An analysis of encounter durations, Solar Syst. Res., 2003, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 156–164.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Emel’yanenko, N.Yu., Asher, D. and Bailey, M, Centaurs from Oort cloud and the origin of Jupiter-family comets, Mon. Notic. Roy. Astron. Soc., 2005, vol. 361, pp. 1345–1351.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Emel’yanenko, N.Yu., Orbital evolution of short-period comets with high values of the Tisserand constant, Proc. IAU Symp. Near Earth Objects, Our Celestial Neighbors: Opportunity and Risk, 2007, no. 236, pp. 35–42.ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. Emel’yanenko, N.Yu., Asteroids with high Tisserant constant with respect to major planets, Tr. Mezhd. konf. “Okolozemnaya astronomiya-2009” (Proc. Int. Conf. “Circumterrestrial Astronomy”), Kazan, 2009a, pp. 139–146.Google Scholar
  13. Emel’yanenko, N.Yu., Evolyutsiya elementov orbit korotkoperiodicheskikh komet (Orbit Elements Evolution for Short-Period Comets), Chelyabinsk: South Ural State Univ., 2009b.Google Scholar
  14. Emel’yanenko, N.Yu., Kachestvennyi analiz i modeli nizkoskorostnykh sblizhenii komet s Yupiterom (Qualitative Analysis and Models of Low-Speed Approaches for Comets and Jupiter), Chelyabinsk: South Ural State Univ., 2010.Google Scholar
  15. Emel’yanenko, N.Yu., Temporary satellite capture of comets by Jupiter, Solar Syst. Res., 2012, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 181–194.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Emel’yanenko, N.Yu. and Naroenkov, S.A., 2006 RH 120 asteroid approach to the Earth, Ekol. Vestn. Nauch. Tsentrov Chernomorsk. Ekonom. Sotrudn., 2013, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 54–59.Google Scholar
  17. Everhart, E., Horseshoe and Trojan orbits associated with Jupiter and Saturn, Astron. J., 1973, vol. 76, no. 4, p. 316.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kazimirchak-Polonskaya, E.I, Comets close approaches to the Jupiter: 1770–1960 review, Tr. Inst. Teor. Astron. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1961, no. 7, pp. 19–190.Google Scholar
  19. Kazimirchak-Polonskaya, E.I, Review of studies on capture of comets by Neptune and its role in the dynamic evolution of comets orbits, in Proc. IAU Coll. 83 Dynamics of Comets: Their Origin and Evolution, Carusi, A. and Valsecchi, G., Eds., Dordreht: Reidel, 1985, pp. 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kresak, L, Dynamical interplations among comets and asteroids, in Asteroids, Gerels, T., Ed., Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press, 1979, pp. 289–309.Google Scholar
  21. Opik, E., Interplanetary Encounters: Close Range Gravitational Interactions, New York: Elsevier, 1976.Google Scholar
  22. Rickman, H. and Malmort, A, Variations of the orbit of comet P/Gehrels 3: temporary satellite captures by Jupiter, Astron. Astrophys., 1981, vol. 87, no. 102, pp. 165–170.ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of AstronomyRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations