Journal of Ichthyology

, Volume 57, Issue 1, pp 10–19 | Cite as

Osteology of the Southern Ocean daggertooth (Anotopterus vorax) and status of the Anotopterus genus in the Aulopiformes order

  • O. S. Voskoboinikova
  • M. V. Nazarkin


The skeletal structure of the Southern Ocean daggertooth (Anotopterus vorax) has been studied for the first time. It generally corresponds to the A. pharao skeleton, as it has been previously described. The discrepancies pertain to the authors’ other various data on both the details of the structures of branchial arches, maxillae, cranium, and axial skeleton and the traits of the Anotopterus genus, which have not been described earlier. They include the availability of a considerable number of bony ribs (epineurals and epicentrals) attached to the neurocranium bones (epiotic, intercalar, and exooccipital) and some elongated and discontinuous lateral keel bones located on both sides of the central keel bone. Cladistic analysis has been performed with the finding that the A. vorax is united with the A. pharao and the Polymerichthys fossil genus into one clade, which takes an intermediate status between the representatives of the Alepisauridae and Paralepididae families. The assumption has been made about the necessity for the restitution of the family status of Anotopteridae.


Southern Ocean daggertooth (Anotopterus voraxAulopiformes skeleton cladistic analysis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baldwin, C.C. and Johnson, G.D., Aulopiform interrelationships, in Interrelationships of Fishes, Stiassny, M.L.J., Eds., San Diego: Academic, 1996, pp. 355–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borodulina, O.D., Identification of remains of mesopelagic fishes from stomachs of raptorial animals. Message 4. Specific axial skeleton of mass fishes of superfamily Alepisauroidea, Vopr. Ikhtiol., 1985, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 986–994.Google Scholar
  3. Davis, M.P., Evolutionary relationships of the Aulopiformes (Euteleostei: Cyclosquamata): a molecular and total evidence approach, in Origin and Phylogenetic Interrelationships of Teleosts, Nelson, J.S., Eds., Munich: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, 2010, pp. 431–470.Google Scholar
  4. Hubbs, C.L., Mead, G.V., and Wilimovsky, N.J., The widespread, probably antitropical distribution and the relationship of the bathypelagic iniomous fish Anatopterus pharao, Bull. Inst. Oceanogr. Univ. Calif., 1953, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 137–197.Google Scholar
  5. Johnson, R.K., Fishes of the Families Evermannellidae and Scopelarchidae: Systematics, Morphology, Interrelationships, and Zoogeography, Chicago, IL: Fieldiana Zool., 1982, vol. 12.Google Scholar
  6. Kukuev, E.I., Taxonomy and distribution of the daggertooths fishes of genus Anotopterus (Anotopteridae, Aulopiformes) in the World Ocean, Vopr. Ikhtiol., 1998, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 745–759.Google Scholar
  7. Monod, T., Le complexe urophore des poisons teleosteens, Mem. Inst. Afr. Noire, 1968, vol. 81.Google Scholar
  8. Nazarkin, M.V., Fossil fishes of the extinct alepisauroid family Polymerichthyidae from the Tertiary of Sakhalin Island, Russia, Acta Palaeontol. Pol., 2016, vol. 61 (in press). doi 10.4202/app.00247.2016Google Scholar
  9. Nelson, J.S., Fishes of the World, New York: Wiley, 1994.Google Scholar
  10. Nelson, J.S., Fishes of the World, New York: Wiley, 2006.Google Scholar
  11. Nybelin, O., Sur quelques especes du la famille des Anotopteridae, Goeteborgs K. Vetensk.-Vitterhets-Samh. Handl., Ser. B, 1946, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
  12. Patterson, C. and Johnson, G.D., The intermuscular bones and ligaments of teleostean fishes, Smithson. Contrib. Zool., 1995, vol. 559, pp. 1–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Potthoff, T., Clearing and staining techniques, in Onthogeny and Systematics of Fishes, ASIH Spec. Publ. No. 1, Moser, H.G., Eds., Lawrence, KS: Allen, 1984, pp. 35–37.Google Scholar
  14. Rofen, R.R., Family Anotopteridae, in Fishes of the Western North Atlantic, New Haven, CT: Yale Univ., 1966, vol. 1, part 5, pp. 498–510.Google Scholar
  15. Sato, T. and Nakabo, T., Paraulopidae and Paraulopus, a new family and genus of aulopiform fishes with revised relationships within the order, Ichthyol. Res., 2002, vol. 49, pp. 25–46.Google Scholar
  16. Uyeno, T., A Miocene alepisauroid fish of a new family, Polymerichthyidae, from Japan, Bull. Nat. Sci. Mus., 1967, vol. 10, pp. 383–394.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zoological InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations