Advertisement

Paleontological Journal

, Volume 52, Issue 12, pp 1412–1418 | Cite as

On Possible Trophic Adaptations of Some Rhytidosteidae (Amphibia, Temnospondyli)

  • A. G. SennikovEmail author
  • I. V. NovikovEmail author
Article

Abstract

Temnospondyl amphibians of the family Rhytidosteidae were widespread in the Early Triassic in the Southern Hemisphere. New records in southeastern European Russia show that the type genus of the family, Rhytidosteus, was widespread in this region of Laurasia. The analysis of morphology of these specimens confined to the Late Olenekian continental deposits of the southern Cis-Urals and Buzuluk Depression and examination of accompanying ichnofossils suggest that the original structure of the skull and jaw apparatus in representatives of this genus (and probably other rhytidosteids) is connected with specific trophic adaptation, i.e., feeding on invertebrates with a rather firm armor (for example, freshwater crustaceans).

Keywords:

Temnospondyli Rhytidosteidae trophic adaptations grayfish burrows 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project nos. 17-04-00410, 16‑05-00711, 17-54-10013, 17-04-01937) and by the State Russian Government Program for Competitive Growth of Kazan Federal University among World’s Leading Scientific and Education Centers.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Dias-da-Silva, S. and Marsicano, C., Phylogenetic reappraisal of Rhytidosteidae (Stereospondyli: Trematosauria), temnospondyl amphibians from the Permian and Triassic, J. Syst. Palaeontol., 2011, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 302–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hasiotis, S.T., The origin and evolution of freshwater and terrestrial crayfishes based on new body and trace fossil evidence, Freshwat. Crayf., 1999, vol. 12, pp. 49–70.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hasiotis, S.T. and Mitchell, C.E., A comparison of crayfish burrow morphologies: Triassic and Holocene fossil, paleo- and neo-ichnological evidence, and the identification of their burrowing signatures, Ichnos, 1993, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 291–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hasiotis, S.T., Mitchell, C.E., and Dubielc, R.F., Application of morphologic burrow interpretations to discern continental burrow architects: Lungfish or crayfish?, Ichnos, 1993, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 315–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maganuco, S., Pasini, G., and Auditore, M., A revision of the short-faced stereospondyls Mahavisaurus dentatus and Lyrosaurus australis from the Lower Triassic of Madagascar: Cranial anatomy, ontogenetic remarks, palaeoecology and rhytidosteid phylogeny, Mem. Soc. Ital. Sci. Natur. Mus. Civico Storia Natur. Milano, 2014, vol. 39, pp. 1–64.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pashchenko. D.I. and Sennikov, A.G., First record of burrows of decapod crustaceans in the Permian deposits of Europe, in Razvedka i dobycha goryuchikh iskopaemykh, geologiya, geografiya, biologiya i ekologiya. Tezisy Dokladov VI mezhvuzovskoi konferentsii po itogam praktik [Elektronnyi resurs] (VI Interuniversity Conference Based on Practice Devoted to Investigation and Extraction of Combustible Minerals, Geology, Geography, Biology, and Ecology: Electronic Resource), Moscow: Pero, 2014, pp. 224–225.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sennikov, A.G., Karasev, E.V., and Pashchenko, D.I., New data on fossil plants and ichnofossils from the Permian of the southern Cis-Urals, in Paleostrat-2015. Godichnoe sobranie (nauchnaya konferentstya) sektsii paleontologii MOIP i Moskovskogo otdeleniya Paleontologicheskogo obsjcjestva pri RAN (Moskva, 26–28 yanvarya 2015 g.). Tezisy dokladov (Paleostrat-2015: Annual Meeting (Scientific Conference) of the Paleontological Section of the Moscow Society of Nature Explorers and the Paleontological Society at the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, January 26–28, 2015: Theses of Reports), Alekseev, A.S., Ed., Moscow: Paleontol. Inst. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2015, p. 65.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sennikov, A.G. and Novikov, I.V., On the finds of Rhytidosteidae (Amphibia, Temnospondyli) in the Lower Triassic of Eastern Europe and probable feeding adaptations of representatives of this family, in Paleostrat-2012. Programma i tezisy dokladov (Paleostrat-2012: Program and Theses of Reports), Moscow: Paleontol. Inst. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2012, pp. 60–61.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shishkin, M.A., Gondwanan rhytidosteids (Amphibia, Temnospondyli) in the Lower Triassic of the southern Cis-Urals, Paleontol. Zh., 1994, no. 4, pp. 97–110.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Borissiak Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Kazan (Volga Region) Federal UniversityKazanRussia

Personalised recommendations