Paleontological Journal

, Volume 46, Issue 6, pp 607–619 | Cite as

Neogene geese and ducks (Aves: Anatidae) from localities of the Great Lakes Depression, western Mongolia

Article

Abstract

New material of ducks and geese from Late Miocene-Early Pliocene localities of the Great Lakes Depression in western Mongolia is described and the previously described material is revised. This study confirms the presence of four goose species, four dabbling ducks, and three diving ducks. A large goose previously described as Heterochen vicinus is assigned to a separate genus, Heteroanser. Bonibernicla ponderosa is transferred to Anserinae, and North American Branta woolfendeni is regarded as a junior synonym of Bonibernicla ponderosa. The validity of two goose species, Anser devjatkini and A. liskunae, is confirmed and both are assigned here to the subgenus Chen. It is also shown that the holotype of Anas molesta actually belongs to a diving duck of the genus Aythya. The presence of Anas soporata in the Hyargas Nuur Formation is not confirmed.

Keywords

Anatidae Anas new taxa Neogene Miocene Pliocene Mongolia 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baumel, J.J., King, A.S., Breazile, J.E., et al., Handbook of Avian Anatomy: Nomina Anatomica Avium, Publ. Nuttall Ornithol. Club, 1993, no. 23, pp. 1–779.Google Scholar
  2. Bickart, K.J., The Birds of the Late Miocene-Early Pliocene Big Sandy Formation, Mohave County, Arizona, Ornithol. Monogr., 1990, vol. 44, pp. 1–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boev, Z.N., Fossil Birds of Dorkovo—An Early Pliocene Site in the Rhodope Mts. (Southern Bulgaria), Geol. Balcan., 1998, vol. 28, nos. 1–2, pp. 53–60.Google Scholar
  4. Boev, Z.N. and Koufos, G.D., The Late Miocene Vertebrate Locality of Perivolaki, Thessaly, Greece: 2. Aves, Palaeontogr. Abt. A, 2006, vol. 276, pp. 11–22.Google Scholar
  5. Brodkorb, P., Birds from the Pliocene of Juntura, Oregon, Quart. J. Florida Acad. Sci., 1961, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 169–184.Google Scholar
  6. Cheneval, J., Les Anatidae (Aves, Anseriformes) du Miocène de France: Révision systématique et évolution, Docum. Lab. Géol. Lyon, 1987, vol. 99, pp. 137–156.Google Scholar
  7. Devyatkin, E.V., Magnetostratigraphic Scheme of the Cenozoic of Mongolia, Stratigr. Geol. Korrelyatsiya, 1994, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 35–45.Google Scholar
  8. Jánossy, D., Plio-Pleistocene Bird Remains from the Carpathian Basin: IV. Anseriformes, Gruiformes, Charadriiformes, Passeriformes, Aquila, 1979, vol. 85, pp. 11–39.Google Scholar
  9. Kurochkin, E.N., On the Avifauna from the Pliocene of Mongolia, Tr. Sovm. Sovet.-Mongol. Nauchn.-Issled. Geol. Eksped., 1971, vol. 3, pp. 58–67.Google Scholar
  10. Kurochkin, E.N., New Data on Pliocene Birds of Western Mongolia, Tr. Sovm. Sovet.-Mongol. Paleontol. Eksped., 1976, no. 3, pp. 51–67.Google Scholar
  11. Kurochkin, E.N., Birds of Central Asia in the Pliocene, Tr. Sovm. Sovet.-Mongol. Paleontol. Eksped., 1985, vol. 26, pp. 1–119.Google Scholar
  12. Livezey, B.C., A Phylogenetic Analysis of Geese and Swans (Anseriformes: Anserinae), Including Selected Fossil Species, Syst. Biol., 1996, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 415–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mlíkovský, J., Cenozoic Birds of the World: Part 1. Europe, Praha: Ninox Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  14. Mlíkovský, J. and Švec, P., Review of the Tertiary Waterfowl (Aves: Anseridae) of Asia, V st. s. Spole. Zool., 1986, vol. 50, pp. 249–272.Google Scholar
  15. Pevzner, M.A., Vangengeim, E.A., Zhegallo, V.I., et al., Correlation of Late Neogene Deposits of Central Asia and Europe Based on Paleomagnetic and Biostratigraphic Data, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Geol., 1982, no. 6, pp. 5–15.Google Scholar
  16. Short, L.L., A New Anseriform Genus and Species from the Nebraska Pliocene, Auk, 1970, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 537–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Vangengeim, E.A., Pevzner, M.A., and Tesakov, A.S., The Age of Boundaries and Position in the Magnetochronological Scale of the Ruscinian and Lower Villafranchian, Stratigr. Geol. Korrelyatsiya, 2005, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 78–95.Google Scholar
  18. Worthy, T.H., Tertiary Fossil Waterfowl (Aves: Anseriformes) of Australia and New Zealand: Unpublished PhD, Adelaide: Univ. Adelaide, 2008, pp. 1–415.Google Scholar
  19. Worthy, T.H. and Lee, M.S.Y., Affinities of Miocene Waterfowl (Anatidae: Manuherikia, Dunstanetta and Miotadorna) from the St Bathans Fauna, New Zealand, Palaeontology, 2008, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 677–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zazhigin, V.S. and Lopatin, A.V., History of the Dipodoidea (Rodentia, Mammalia) in the Miocene of Asia: 4. Dipodinae at the Miocene-Pliocene Boundary, Paleontol. Zh., 2001, no. 1, pp. 61–75.Google Scholar
  21. Zelenkov, N.V., Diving Ducks from the Middle Miocene of Western Mongolia, Paleontol. Zh., 2011, no. 2, pp. 70–77.Google Scholar
  22. Zelenkov, N.V. and Kurochkin, E.N., Neogene Phasianids (Aves: Phasianidae) of Central Asia: 1. Genus Tologuica gen. nov., Paleontol. Zh., 2009, no. 2, pp. 86–92.Google Scholar
  23. Zelenkov, N.V. and Kurochkin, E.N., Modern State of the Study of Birds from the Neogene of Central Asia, in Pamyati A.Ya. Tugarinova (In Memory of A.Ya. Tugarinov), Martynovich, N.V., Ed., Krasnoyarsk, 2011, pp. 46–75.Google Scholar
  24. Zelenkov, N.V. and Kurochkin, E.N., Dabbling Ducks (Aves: Anatidae) from the Middle Miocene of Mongolia, Paleontol. Zh., 2012, no. 4, pp. 88–95.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Borissiak Paleontological InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations