Paleontological Journal

, Volume 46, Issue 5, pp 520–530 | Cite as

A new duck from the Middle Miocene of Mongolia, with comments on Miocene evolution of ducks

Article

Abstract

A new relatively large duck, Chenoanas deserta gen. et sp. nov. from the Middle Miocene of the Sharga locality, which is morphologically intermediate between the extant genera Chenonetta and Tachyeres, is described. The diversity of Early and Middle Miocene ducks is discussed. It is noted that some Middle Miocene duck remains are incorrectly referred to the genus Mionetta. The distribution of morphological characters of the humerus in Neogene and extant ducks shows that the present day diversity of ducks apparently results from extinction of some taxa which were formed in the Oligocene-Early Miocene. The distribution of morphological characters in the evolution of diving ducks is evidence that not only the formation of different morphotypes but also so-called “evolutionary maturation” of taxa also explains the modern diversity.

Keywords

Anatidae parallel evolution Miocene Mongolia 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agnolín, F.L., Revisión systemática de algunas aves deseadenses (Oligoceno Medio) descriptas por Ameghino en 1899, Rev. Mus. Argent. Cienc. Natur. N. Ser., 2004, vol. 6, pp. 239–244.Google Scholar
  2. Alvarez, R. and Olson, S.L., A New Merganser from the Miocene of Virginia (Aves: Anatidae), Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., 1978, vol. 91, pp. 522–532.Google Scholar
  3. Ballmann, P., Les oiseaux miocènes de La Grive-Saint-Alban (Isère), Geobios, 1969, vol. 2, pp. 157–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumel, J.J., King, A.S., Breazile, J.E., et al., Handbook of Avian Anatomy: Nomina Anatomica Avium, Publ. Nuttall Ornithol. Club, 1993, no. 23, pp. 1–779.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, J.J., Neogene Avian Localities of North America, Washington, DC-London: Smithson. Inst. Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  6. Brodkorb, P., Birds from the Pliocene of Juntura, Oregon, Quart. J. Florida Acad. Sci., 1961, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 169–184.Google Scholar
  7. Bulgarella, M., Sorenson, M.D., Peters, J.L., et al., Phylogenetic Relationships of Amazonetta, Speculanas, Lophonetta, and Tachyeres: Four Morphologically Divergent Duck Genera Endemic to South America, J. Avian Biol., 2010, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 186–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cenizo, M.M. and Agnolín, F.L., The Southernmost Records of Anhingidae and a New Basal Species of Anatidae (Aves) from the Lower-Middle Miocene of Patagonia, Argentina, Alcheringa, 2010, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 493–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheneval, J., Les Anatidae (Aves, Anseriformes) du gisement aquitanien de Saint-Gérand-le-Puy (Allier, France), in Act. Sympos. Paléontol. G. Cuvier, Buffeteaut, E., Mazin, J.M., and Salmon, E., Eds., Montbéliard: Ville de Montbéliard, 1983, pp. 85–98.Google Scholar
  10. Cheneval, J., Les Anatidae (Aves, Anseriformes) du Miocène de France: Révision systématique et évolution, Doc. Lab. Géol. Lyon, 1987, vol. 99, pp. 137–156.Google Scholar
  11. Cheneval, J., The Avifauna of Sansan, Mém. Mus. Nat. Hist. Natur., 2000, vol. 183, pp. 321–388.Google Scholar
  12. Cheneval, J., Ginsburg, L., Mourer-Chauviré, C., and Ratanasthien, B., The Miocene Avifauna of the Li Mae Long Locality, Thailand: Systematics and Paleoecology, J. South. Asian Earth Sci., 1991, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eo, S.H., Bininda-Emonds, O.R.P., and Carroll, J.P., A Phylogenetic Supertree of the Fowls (Galloanserae, Aves), Zool. Scr., 2009, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 465–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Filippelli, G.M., Intensification of the Asian Monsoon and a Chemical Weathering Event in the Late Miocene-Early Pliocene: Implications for Late Neogene Climate Change, Geology, 1997, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 27–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Flower, B.P. and Kennett, J.P., The Middle Miocene Climatic Transition: East Antarctic Ice Sheet Development, Deep Ocean Circulation and Global Carbon Cycling, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., 1994, vol. 108, nos. 3–4, pp. 537–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fossil Birds of China, Hou, L.H., Chuong, Ch.-M., Yang, A., et al., Eds., Yunan: Sci. Technol. Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  17. Gál, E., Hár, J., Kessler, E., et al., Middle Miocene Fossils from the Sections at the Rákóczi Chapell at Mátraszölös, Fol. Hist. Natur. Mus. Matraensis, 1998–1999, vol. 23, pp. 33–78.Google Scholar
  18. Gál, E., Hár, J., Kessler, E., et al., Middle Miocene Fossils from the Section of the Road at the Rákóczi Chapell, Mátraszölös: 2. Locality Mátraszölös 2, Fol. Hist. Natur. Mus. Matraensis, 2000, vol. 24, pp. 39–75.Google Scholar
  19. Göhlich, U.B., The Avifauna of the Miocene Fossil-Lagerstatte Sandelzhausen (Bavaria, Southern Germania), Zitteliana, 2002, vol. 22, pp. 169–190.Google Scholar
  20. Göhlich, U.B., The Early Vallesian Vertebrates of Atzelsdorf (Late Miocene, Austria): 5. Aves, Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien, 2009, vol. 111A, pp. 509–514.Google Scholar
  21. Gonzalez, J., Düttman, H., and Wink, M., Phylogenetic Relationships Based on Two Mitochondrial Genes and Hybridization Patterns in Anatidae, J. Zool., 2009, vol. 279, no. 3, pp. 310–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heizmann, E.P.J. and Hesse, A., Die mittelmiozänen Vogel- und Säugetierfaunen des Nördlinger Ries (MN 6) und des Steinheimer Beckens (MN 7)—ein Vergleich, Cour. Forsch. Senckenb., 1995, vol. 181, pp. 171–186.Google Scholar
  23. Kessler, E., Review of the Neogene Waterfowl (Aves: Anatidae) of Eastern Paratethys, Stud. Univ. Babes-Bolyai. Biol., 1992, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 47–54.Google Scholar
  24. Kessler, E., New Results with Regard to the Neogene and Quaternary Avifauna of the Carpathian Basin: Part I, Földt. Közl, 2009, vol. 139, pp. 67–81.Google Scholar
  25. Kurochkin, E.N., New Oligocene Birds of Kazakhstan, Paleontol. Zh., 1968, no. 1, pp. 92–101.Google Scholar
  26. Livezey, B.C., A Phylogenetic Analysis of Recent Anseriform Genera Using Morphological Characters, Auk, 1986, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 737–754.Google Scholar
  27. Livezey, B.C. and Martin, L.D., The Systematic Position of the Miocene Anatid Anas [?] blanchardi Milne-Edwards, J. Vertebr. Paleontol., 1988, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 196–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lopatin, A.V., Early Miocene Small Mammals from the North Aral Region (Kazakhstan) with Special Reference to Their Stratigraphic Significance, Paleontol. J., 2004, vol. 38, suppl. 3, pp. 217–223.Google Scholar
  29. Mayr, G., Palaeogene Fossil Birds, Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mayr, G. and Smith, R., Ducks, Rails, and Limicoline Waders (Aves: Anseriformes, Gruiformes, Charadriiformes) from the Lowermost Oligocene of Belgium, Geobios, 2001, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 547–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller, A.H., An Avifauna from the Lower Miocene of South Dakota, Univ. Calif. Publ. Bull. Depart. Geol. Sci., 1944, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 85–100.Google Scholar
  32. Mlíkovský, J., Cenozoic Birds of the World: Part 1. Europe, Praha: Ninox Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  33. Mlíkovský, J., Middle Miocene Birds of Františkovy Lázn, Bohemia, J. Nat. Mus. Natur. Hist. Ser., 2003, vol. 172, pp. 109–113.Google Scholar
  34. Mlíkovský, J. and Švec, P., Review of the Tertiary Waterfowl (Aves: Anseridae) of Asia, V st. s. Spole. Zool., 1986, vol. 50, pp. 249–272.Google Scholar
  35. Mourer-Chauviré, C., Birds (Aves) from the Early Miocene of the Northern Sperrgebiet, Namibia, Mem. Geol. Surv. Namibia, 2008, vol. 20, pp. 147–167.Google Scholar
  36. Mourer-Chauviré, C., Berthet, D., and Hugueney, M., The Late Oligocene Birds from the Créchy Quarry (Allier, France) with a Description of Two New Genera (Aves: Pelecaniformes: Phalacrocoracidae, and Anseriformes: Anseranatidae), Senckenb. Lethaea, 2004, vol. 84, pp. 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Noriega, J.I., The Avifauna from the “Mesopotamian” (Ituzaing Formation: Upper Miocene) of Entre Ríos Provincem Argentina, Cour. Forsch. Senckenb., 1995, vol. 181, pp. 141–148.Google Scholar
  38. Noriega, J.I., Tambussi, C.P., and Cozzuol, M.A., New Material of Cayaoa bruneti Tonni, an Early Miocene Anseriform (Aves) from Patagonia, Argentina, Neues Jahrb. Geol. Paläontol. Abh., 2008, vol. 249, no. 3, pp. 271–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Olson, S.L., A Brief Synopsis of the Fossil Birds from the Pamunkey River and Other Tertiary Marine Deposits in Virginia, in Stratigraphy and Paleontology of the Outcropping Tertiary Beds in the Pamunkey River Region, Central Virginia Coastal Plain, Lauck, W.W. and Krafft, K., Eds., Atlantic Coast. Plain Geol. Ass., 1984, pp. 217–223.Google Scholar
  40. Olson, S.L., The Fossil Record of Birds, in Avian Biology, Farner, D.S., King, J.R., and Parkes, K.C., Eds., New York: Acad. Press, 1985, vol. 8, pp. 79–252.Google Scholar
  41. Olson, S.L. and Rasmussen, P.C., Miocene and Pliocene Birds from the Lee Creek Mine, North Carolina, Smithson. Contrib. Paleobiol., 2001, vol. 90, pp. 233–365.Google Scholar
  42. Sraml, M., Christidis, L., Easteal, S., et al., Molecular Relationships within Australasian Waterfowl (Anseriformes), Aust. J. Zool., 1996, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Woolfenden, G.E., Postcranial Osteology of the Waterfowl, Bull. Florida St. Mus. Biol. Sci., 1961, vol. 6, pp. 1–129.Google Scholar
  44. Worthy, T.H., Tertiary Fossil Waterfowl (Aves: Anseriformes) of Australia and New Zealand, Unpublished PhD, Adelaide: Univ. Adelaide, 2008, pp. 1–415.Google Scholar
  45. Worthy, T.H., Descriptions and Phylogenetic Relationships of Two New Genera and Four New Species of Oligo-Miocene Waterfowl (Aves: Anatidae) from Australia, Zool. J. Linnean Soc., 2009, vol. 156, no. 2, pp. 411–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Worthy, T.H. and Lee, M.S.Y., Affinities of Miocene Waterfowl (Anatidae: Manuherikia, Dunstanetta and Miotadorna) from the St Bathans Fauna, New Zealand, Palaeontology, 2008, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 677–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Worthy, T.H., Tennyson, A.JD., Jones, C., et al., Miocene Waterfowl and Other Birds from Central Otago, New Zealand, J. Syst. Palaeontol., 2007, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Worthy, T.H., Tennyson, A.J.D., Hand, S.J., and Scofield, R.P., A New Species of the Diving Duck Manuherikia and Evidence for Geese (Aves: Anatidae: Anserinae) in the St Bathans Fauna (Early Miocene), New Zealand, J. Roy. Soc. N. Zeal., 2008, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yeh, H.K., Fossil Birds from Linqu, Shandong, Vertebr. PalAsiat., 1980, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 116–125.Google Scholar
  50. Zelenkov, N.V., Birds of the Neogene of Central Asia, Candidate’s Dissertation in Biology, Moscow: Paleontol. Inst. Russ. Acad. Sci., 2011a, pp. 1–304.Google Scholar
  51. Zelenkov, N.V., Diving Ducks from the Middle Miocene of Western Mongolia, Paleontol. Zh., 2011b, no. 2, pp. 70–77.Google Scholar
  52. Zelenkov, N.V. and Kurochkin, E.N., Birds of Central Asia in the Neogene, in Materialy XIII Mezhdunarodnoi Ornitologicheskoi Konferentsii Severnoi Evrazii: Ornitologiya V Tsentral’Noi Evrazii (XIII International Ornithological Conference of Northern Eurasia on Ornithology in Central Eurasia), Orenburg: Orenb. Gos. Ped. Univ., 2010, pp. 133–134.Google Scholar
  53. Zelenkov, N.V. and Kurochkin, E.N., Dabbling Ducks (Aves: Anatidae) from the Middle Miocene of Mongolia, Paleontol. Zh., 2012, no. 4, pp. 88–95.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Borissiak Paleontological InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations