Paleontological Journal

, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 90–104 | Cite as

New tanystropheids (Reptilia: Archosauromorpha) from the Triassic of Europe

  • A. G. SennikovEmail author


A new prolacertilian species and genus, Augustaburiania vatagini gen. et sp. nov. (Reptilia: Archosauromorpha), from the Lower Triassic of the Don River Basin is described. It is the first representative of the Tanystropheidae in the Eastern Europe and the world oldest member of this family. Another new genus (Protanystropheus gen. nov.) from Central and Western Europe is also established. The diversity, systematics, phylogeny, evolution, and stratigraphic and geographical distribution of prolacertilians are discussed. The ecological role of prolacertilians in Early Triassic communities and adaptation to marine environments are analyzed.


Archosauromorpha Prolacertilia Tanystropheidae diversity systematics phylogeny Triassic Eastern Europe 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. Augusta, Extinct World (Nedra, Moscow, 1979) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. J. Benton and A. D. Walker, “Rhombopholis, a Prolacertiform Reptile from the Middle Triassic of England,” Palaeontology 39(3), 763–782 (1996).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. L. Camp, “Prolacerta and the Protorosaurian Reptiles,” Am. J. Sci. 243(2), 84–101 (1945).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. L. Carroll Vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution (Freeman and Co., New York, 1988), Vol. 3.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Chatterjee, “A New Eosuchian Reptile from the Late Triassic of India,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ser. B 291(1048), 163–200 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Chatterjee, “Malerisaurus langstoni, a New Diapsid Reptile from the Triassic of Texas,” J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 6(4), 297–312 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. C. Fraser and O. Rieppel, “A New Protorosaur (Diapsida) from the Upper Buntsandstein of the Black Forest, Germany,” J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 26(4), 866–871 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. A. Garyainov and S. P. Rykov, “Southeastern Slope of the Voronezh Anteclise, Obshchii Syrt, and Orenburg Fore-Urals,” in Stratigraphy of the USSR: Triassic System, Ed. by L. D. Kiparisova, G. P. Radchenko, and V. P. Gorskii (Nedra, Moscow, 1973), pp. 89–111 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Gervais, “Description de l'Aphelosaurus latevensis, saurien fossile des schistes Permiens de Lodeve,” Ann. Sci. Nat. 10(4), 233–235 (1858).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. E. Gow, “The Morphology and Relationships of Youngina capensis Broom and Prolacerta broomi Parrington,” Palaeontol. Afr., No. 18, 89–131 (1975).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    F. von Huene, “Über der Trias-Dinosaurier Europas,” Zentr. Deut. Geol. Gess. 57, 345–349 (1905).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    F. von Huene, “Die Dinosaurier der europaischen Triasformation,” Geol. Paläontol. Abh. 1(Suppl.), 1–419 (1907–1908).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    F. von Huene, “Über Tanystropheus und verwandte Formen,” N. Jahrb. Mineral. etc. 67(B), 65–86 (1931).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    F. von Huene, Paläontologie und Phylogenie der niederen Tetrapoden (Fischer, Jena, 1956).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    O. Kuhn, “Proganosauria, Bolosauria, Placodontia, Araeoscelidia, Trilophosauria, Weigeltisauria, Millerosauria, Rhynchocephalia, Protorosauria,” in Handbuch der Palaeoherpetologie (G. Fisher, Stuttgart, 1969), Vol. 9.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    C. Li, “First Record of Protorosaurid Reptile (Order Protorosauria) from the Middle Triassic of China,” Acta Geol. Sin. 77(4), 419–423 (2003).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    H. von Meyer, Zur Fauna der Vorwelt: III. Die Saurier aus dem Kupferschiefer der Zechstein-Formation (Frankfurt am Main, 1856).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    F. von Nopcsa, “Neubeschreibung des Trias-Pterosauriers Tribelesodon,” Paläontol. Z. 5, 161–181 (1923).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    S. Nosotti, “Tanystropheus longobardicus (Reptilia, Protorosauria): Re-Interpretations of the Anatomy Based on New Specimens from the Middle Triassic of Besano (Lombardy, Northern Italy),” Mem. Soc. Ital. Sci. Natur. Museo Civ. Stor. Natur. Milano 35(3), 1–88 (2007).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    I. V. Novikov, “El major yacimiento de tetrapodos del Triassico Temprano en Europa Oriental: ciencia y geoturismo,” Natur. Aragonesa, No. 17, 18–22 (2006).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    I. V. Novikov, A. G. Sennikov, A. V. Minikh, et al., “New Data on Early Triassic Vertebrates in the “Donskaya Luka” Locality” (Volgograd Region): Report 1,” Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Geol. Razved., No. 6, 33–38 (2001).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    I. V. Novikov, A. G. Sennikov, A. V. Minikh, et al., “New Data on Early Triassic Vertebrates in the “Donskaya Luka” Locality” (Volgograd Region): Report 2,” Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Geol. Razved., No. 2, 43–53 (2002).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    V. G. Ochev, “An Unusual Tooth from the Lower Triassic of Donskaya Luka,” Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Geol. Razved., No. 8, 176–177 (1976).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    P. E. Olsen, “A New Aquatic Eosuchian from the Newark Supergroup (Late Triassic-Early Jurassic) of North Carolina and Virginia,” Postilla, No. 176, 1–14 (1979).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    B. Peyer, “Die Triasfauna der Tessiner Kalkalpen: II. Tanystropheus longobardicus Bass,” Abh. Schweiz. Palaeontol. Ges. 50, 1–110 (1931).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    B. Peyer, “Die Triasfauna der Tessiner Kalkalpen: XII. Macrocnemus bassanii Nopcsa,” Abh. Scheweiz. Palaeontol. Ges. 59, 1–140 (1937).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    S. Renesto, “A New Prolacertiform Reptile from the Late Triassic of Northern Italy,” Riv. Ital. Paleontol. Stratigr. 100(2), 285–306 (1994).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    S. Renesto, “A New Specimen of Tanystropheus (Reptilia Protorosauria) from the Middle Triassic of Switzerland and the Ecology of the Genus,” Riv. Ital. Paleontol. Stratigr. 111(3), 377–394 (2005).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    S. Renesto and F. Dalla Vecchia, “The Unusual Dentition and Feeding Habits of the Prolacertiform Reptile Langobardisaurus (Late Triassic, Northern Italy),” J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 20(3), 622–627 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    O. Rieppel, C. Li, and N. C. Fraser, “The Skeletal Anatomy of the Triassic Protorosaur Dinocephalosaurus orientalis Li from the Middle Triassic of Guizhou Province, Southern China,” J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 28(1), 95–110 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    A. S. Romer, Osteology of the Reptilia (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 1956).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    S. P. Rykov and V. G. Ochev, “On Localities of Triassic Vertebrates in Donskaya Luka,” Questions of Geology of the Southern Ural Mountains and Volga Region (Saratov. Gos. Univ., Saratov, 1966), Part 1, No. 3, pp. 58–62 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    K. Seeley, “Research on the Structure, Organisation and Classification of the Fossil Reptilia: 1. On the Protorosaurus Speneri (Von Meyer),” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ser. B 178, 187–213 (1887).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    K. Sen, “Pamelaria dolichotrachela, a New Prolacertid Reptile from the Middle Triassic of India,” J. Asian Earth Sci. 21(6), 663–681 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    A. G. Sennikov, “Evolution of the Postcranial Skeleton of Archosaurs in Connection with New Finds of Early Triassic Rauisuchidae in Russia,” Paleontol. Zh., No. 6, 44–56 (1999) [Paleontol. J. 33 (6), 648–659 (1999)].Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    A. G. Sennikov, “Discovery of a Primitive Sauropterygian from the Lower Triassic of the Donskaya Luka (Don Basin) and the Range of Triassic Marine Reptiles in Russia,” Paleontol. Zh., No. 3, 76–85 (2001) [Paleontol. J. 35 (3), 301–309 (2001)].Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    A. G. Sennikov, “A New Specialized Prolacertilian (Reptilia: Archosauromorpha) from the Lower Triassic of the Orenburg Region,” Paleontol. Zh., No. 2, 88–97 (2005) [Paleontol. J. 39 (2), 199–209 (2005)].Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    A. G. Sennikov, “Subclass Archosauromorpha,” in “Extinct Vertebrates of Russia and Adjacent Countries: Extinct Reptiles and Birds, 2 Ed. by M. F. Ivakhnenko and E. N. Kurochkin (GEOS, Moscow, 2008), Part 1, pp. 266–318 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    M. A. Shishkin, A. G. Sennikov, I. V. Novikov, and N. V. Ilyina, “Differentiation of Tetrapod Communities and Some Aspects of Biotic Events in the Early Triassic of Eastern Europe,” Paleontol. Zh., No. 1, 3–12 (2006) [Paleontol. J. 40 (1), 1–10 (2006)].Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    L. P. Tatarinov, “Suborder Tanystrachelia,” in Fundamentals of Paleontology: Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds (Nauka, Moscow, 1964), pp. 460–461 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    K. Tschanz, “Tanystropheus—An Unusual Reptilian Construction,” in Konstruktionsprinzipien lebender und ausgestorbener Reptilien (Konzepte SF B230, Stuttgart, 1985), Part 4, 169–177.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    K. Tschanz, “Allometry and Heterochrony in the Growth of the Neck of Triassic Prolacertiform Reptiles,” Palaeontology 31(4), 997–1011 (1988).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    R. Wild, “Die Triasfauna der Tessiner Kalkalpen:: XXIII. Tanystropheus longobardicus (Bassani) (Neue Ergebnisse),” Schweiz. Paläontol. Abh. 95, 1–162 (1973).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    R. Wild, “Die Triasfauna der Tessiner Kalkalpen: XXIV. Neue Funde Von Tanystropheus (Reptilia, Squamata),” Schweiz. Paläontol. Abh. 102, 1–44 (1980a).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    R. Wild, “Tanystropheus (Reptilia, Squamata) and Its Importance for Stratigraphy,” Mém. Soc. Géol. France NS, No. 139, 201–206 (1980b).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    R. Wild and H. Oosterink, “Tanystropheus (Reptilia, Squamata) aus dem Unteren Muschelkalk von Winterswijk, Holland,” Grondboor Hamer., No. 5, 142–148 (1984).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Borissiak Paleontological InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations