Paleontological Journal

, Volume 44, Issue 12, pp 1552–1559 | Cite as

Paleontological evidence for the supposed precambrian occurrence of mollusks

  • A. Yu. Ivantsov


The paper discusses a group of the Late Vendian fossils supposedly related to mollusks. The fossils include imprints with some anatomical characteristics of mollusks, traces resembling scratch marks left by radula, and structures resembling soft shells. Kimberella quadrata, which is represented by all the above kinds of fossils was most likely a trochophore animal of a pre-molluscan evolutionary stage. Remains of Armillifera parva and Solza margarita only slightly resemble shells, and in the absence of the knowledge on the soft body of these animals there are no enongh evidences affiliate them with mollusks.


Precambrian Vendian mollusks Radulichnus Kimberella Armillifera Solza 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. Dzik and A. Yu. Ivantsov, “Internal Anatomy of a New Precambrian Dickinsoniid Dipleurozoan from Northern Russia,” N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Mh., No. 7, 385–396 (2002).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. A. Fedonkin, “Systematic Description of the Vendian Metazoa,” in The Vendian System, Vol. 1, Paleontology, Ed. by B. S. Sokolov and A. B. Ivanovski (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990), pp. 71–120.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. A. Fedonkin and B. M. Waggoner, “The Late Precambrian Fossil Kimberella Is a Mollusc-Like Bilaterian Organism,” Nature 388(6645), 868–871 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. A. Fedonkin, “Glimpse into 600 Million Years Ago,” Science in Russia 6(126), 4–15 (2001).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. A. Fedonkin, “The Origin of the Metazoa in the Light of the Proterozoic Fossil Record,” Paleontol. Res. 7(1), 9–41 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. A. Fedonkin and P. Vickers-Rich, “First Trace of Motion,” in The Rise and Fall of the Ediacaran Biota (Geol. Soc. London Spec. Publ. Vol. 286), Ed. by P. Vickers-Rich and P. Komarower (Geol. Soc. Publ. House, London, 2007), pp. 205–216.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. A. Fedonkin, A. Simonetta, and A. Yu. Ivantsov, “New Data on Kimberella, the Vendian Mollusc-Like Organism (White Sea Region, Russia): Palaeoecological and Evolutionary Implications,” in The Rise and Fall of the Ediacaran Biota (Geol. Soc. London Spec. Publ. Vol. 286), Ed. by P. Vickers-Rich and P. Komarower (Geol. Soc. Publ. House, London, 2007), pp. 157–179.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. G. Gehling, “The Case of Ediacaran Fossil Roots to the Metazoan Tree,” Mem. Geol. Soc. India, No. 20, 181–224 (1991).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. G. Gehling, “Ediacara Organisms: Relating Form to Function,” in Evolving Form and Function: Fossils and Development: Proc. Sympos. Honoring Adolf Seilacher, Ed. by D. E. G. Briggs (Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, 2005), pp. 43–66.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. F. Glaessner and B. Daily, “The Geology and Late Precambrian Fauna of the Ediacara Fossil Reserve,” Rec. South Austral. Mus. 13(3), 369–401 (1959).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. F. Glaessner and M. Wade, “The Late Precambrian Fossils from Ediacara, South Australia,” Palaeontology 9(4), 599–628 (1966).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Grazhdankin, “Structure and Depositional Environment of the Vendian Complex in the Southeastern White Sea Area,” Stratigr. Geol. Korrelyatsiya 11(4), 3–23 (2003) [Stratigr. Geol. Correlation 11 (4), 313–331 (2003)].Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Yu. Ivantsov and M. A. Fedonkin, “Traces of Spontaneous Movement: Final Proof of the Animal Nature of Ediacaran Organisms,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on the Evolution of Life on the Earth, Tomsk, November 12–15, 2001, Ed. by V. M. Podobina (Izd. Nauchno-Tekh. Lit-ry, Tomsk, 2001a), pp. 133–137 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Yu. Ivantsov and M. A. Fedonkin, “Locomotion Trails of the Vendian Invertebrates Preserved with the Producer’s Body Fossils, White Sea, Russia,” in Abstracts of North American Paleontological Convention (PaleoBios, Berkeley, 2001b), Vol. 21, p. 72.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Yu. Ivantsov and Ya. E. Malakhovskaya, “Giant Traces of Vendian Animals,” Dokl. Ross. Akad. Nauk 385A(3), 382–386 (2002) [Dokl. Earth Sci. 385A (6), 618–622 (2002)].Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Yu. Ivantsov, “New Proarticulata from the Vendian of the Arkhangel’sk Region,” Paleonol. Zh., No. 3, 21–26 (2004) [Paleonol. J. 38 (3), 247–253 (2004)].Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Yu. Ivantsov, Ya. E. Malakhovskaya, and E. A. Serezhnikova, “Some Problematic Fossils from the Vendian of the Southeastern White Sea Region,” Paleontol. Zh., No. 1, 3–9 (2004) [Paleontol. J. 38 (1), 1–9 (2004)].Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Yu. Ivantsov, “Proarticulata—a Phylum of Multicellular Animals that Became Extinct in the Precambrian,” in Evolutionary Morphology of Animals. Conference in Memory of the 100th Anniversary of Academician A.V. Ivanov. Part 1: Proceedings of the St. Petersburg Society of Naturalists (S.-Peterb. Gos. Univ. Press, St. Petersburg, 2008), Ser. 1, Vol. 97, pp. 32–42 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. Yu. Ivantsov, “A New Reconstruction of Kimberella—a Problematic Vendian Metazoan,” Paleontol. Zh., No. 6, 3–12 (2009) [Paleontol. J. 43 (6), 601–611 (2009)].Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. J. F. Jenkins, “Functional and Ecological Aspects of Ediacaran Assemblages,” in Origin and Early Evolution of the Metazoa, Ed. by J. Lipps and P. Signor (Plenum Press, New York, 1992), pp. 131–176.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. J. F. Jenkins, “The Problems and Potential of Using Animal Fossils and Trace Fossils in Terminal Proterozoic Biostratigraphy,” Precambrian Res. 73(1–4), 51–69 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    C. Nielsen, Animal Evolution. Interrelationships of the Living Phyla (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2001).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    P. Yu. Parkhaev, “Chapter 3: The Early Cambrian Radiation of Mollusca,” in Phylogeny and Evolution of Molluscs, Ed. by W. F. Ponder and D. R. Lindberg (Univ. California Press, Berkeley, 2008), pp. 33–69.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    E. Ruppert, R. S. Fox, and R. D. Barnes, Invertebrate Zoology: A Functional Evolutionary Approach, 7th ed. (Thomas-Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA, USA, 2004).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    A. Seilacher, “Biomat-Related Lifestyles in the Precambrian,” Palaios 14(1), 86–93 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    A. Seilacher, D. Grazhdankin, and A. Leguta, “Ediacaran Biota: The Dawn of Animal Life in the Shadow of Giant Protists,” Paleontol. Res. 7(1), 43–54 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. Seilacher, Trace Fossil Analysis (Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 2007).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    P. Trusler, J. Stilwell, and P. Vickers-Rich, “Comment: Future Research Directions for Further Analysis of Kimberella,” in The Rise and Fall of the Ediacaran Biota (Geol. Soc. London Spec. Publ. Vol. 286), Ed. by P. Vickers-Rich and P. Komarower (Geol. Soc. Publ. House, London, 2007), pp. 181–185.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    M. Wade, “Hydrozoa and Scyphozoa and Other Medusoids from the Precambrian Ediacara Fauna, South Australia,” Palaeontology 15(2), 197–225 (1972).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Yu. Ivantsov
    • 1
  1. 1.Borissiak Paleontological InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations