Paleontological Journal

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 328–336 | Cite as

Neogene phasianids (Aves: Phasianidae) of Central Asia: 3. Genera Lophogallus gen. nov. and Syrmaticus

  • N. V. ZelenkovEmail author
  • E. N. Kurochkin


Large phasianids from four Miocene and Pliocene localities of Mongolia are reviewed. Lophogallus naranbulakensis gen. et sp. nov. from the Middle Miocene of the Naran Bulak locality is described. It resembles extant Gallus, Lophura, and partially Pavo. The fossil pheasant Syrmaticus kozlovae Kurochkin is compared in detail with other Neogene and living pheasants. The stratigraphic position of phasianids from Neogene localities of Central Asia is discussed.

Key words

Phasianidae Galliformes new taxa Neogene Mongolia Asia 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    P. Ballmann, “Les oiseaux miocènes de La Grive-Saint-Alban (Isère),” Geobios 2, 157–204 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. J. Baumel, A. S. King, J. E. Breazile, et al., “Hand-book of Avian Anatomy: Nomina Anatomica Avium,” Publ. Nutt. Ornithol. Club., No. 23, 1–779 (1993).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Z. Boev, “Fossil Record and Disappearance of Peafowl (Pavo Linnaeus) from the Balkan Peninsula and Europe (Aves: Phasianidae),” Hist. Natur. Bulgar 14, 109–115 (2002).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. I. Burchak-Abramovich and G. K. Meladze, “Rustaviornis georgicus gen. et sp. n., a New Fossil Bird from the Hipparion Fauna of Georgia,” Acta Zool. Cracov 17(16), 373–387 (1972).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. L. Bush and C. Strobeck, “Phylogenetic Relationships of the Phasianidae Reveals Possible Non-Pheasant Taxa,” J. Hered. 94(6), 472–489 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Cheneval, “Fossil Bird Study, and Paleoecological and Paleoenvironmental Consequences: Example from the Saint-Gérand-Le-Puy Deposits (Lower Miocene, Allier, France),” Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol, 73(4), 295–309 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Cheneval, “L’avifaune de sansan,” Mém. Mus. Nat. Hist. Natur 138, 321–388 (2000).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Gaillard, “Contributions à l’étude des oiseaux fossiles,” Arch. Mus. Hist. Natur. Lyon 15(2), 1–100 (1939).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Z. T. Guo, B. Sun, Z. C. Zhang, et al., “A Major Reorganization of Asian Climate Regime by the Early Miocene,” Clim. Past Disc. 4, 535–584 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. H. Hou, “Upper Miocene Birds from Lufeng, Yunnan,” Acta Anthropol. Sin. 4(2), 118–126 (1985).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. Jánossy, “Plio-Pleistocene Bird Remains from the Carpathian Basin: I. Galliformes: 2. Phasianidae,” Aquila 83(1), 29–42 (1976).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Jánossy, “Bird Remains from the Upper Miocene (MN 9) of Rudabanya (N-Hungary),” Aquila 100(1), 53–70 (1993).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. A. Johnsgard, The Pheasants of the World (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1986).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. C. Kimball, E. L. Braun, P. W. Zwartjies, et al., “A Molecular Phylogeny of the Pheasants and Partridges Suggests That These Lineages Are not Monophyletic,” Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 11(1), 38–54 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. N. Kurochkin, “New Data on Birds of the Pliocene of Western Mongolia,” Tr. Sovm. Sovet.-Mongol. Paleontol. Eksped. 3, 51–67 (1976).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    E. N. Kurochkin, “Birds of Central Asia in the Pliocene,” Tr. Sovm. Sovet.-Mongol. Paleontol. Eksped. 26, 1–119 (1985).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. Lambrecht, Handbuch der Palaeornithologie (Borntraeger, Berlin, 1933).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    “Late Cenozoic of Mongolia (Stratigraphy and Paleogeography,” Tr. Sovm. Sovet.-Mongol. Paleontol. Eksped. 47, 1–213 (1989).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    G. Mayr, M. Poschmann, and M. Wuttke, “A Nearly Complete Skeleton of the Fossil Galliform Bird Palaeortyx from the Late Oligocene of Germany,” Acta Ornithol. 41(2), 129–135 (2006).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. Milne-Edwards, Recherches anatomiques et paléontologiques pour servir à l’histoire des oiseaux fossiles de la France (Victor Masson Fils, Paris, 1869).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    C. Mourer-Chauviré, “Les paons du pliocène et du pleistocène infèrieur d’Europe: Biostratigraphie Et Palaeoécologie,” Docum. Lab. Géol Lyon 9, 77–91 (1990).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    C. Mourer-Chauviré, “The Galliformes (Aves) of Phosphorites Du Quercy (France): Systematics and Biostratigraphy,” Natur. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles County. Sci. Ser. 36, 37–95 (1992).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    C. Mourer-Chauviré and D. Geraads, “The Late Pliocene Avifauna of Ahl Al Oughlam, Morocco,” in 6th Intern. Meeting of the Society of Avian Palaeontology and Evolution: Abstracts (Esperaza, 2008), p. 44.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    V. V. Titov, A. S. Tesakov, I. G. Danilov, et al., “First Representative Fauna of Vertebrates from the Late Miocene of Southern European Russia,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 411(5), 715–717 (2006) [Dokl. Biol. Sci. 411 (1), 508–509 (2006)].Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    J. F. Villalta, “Las aves fósiles del Mioceno español,” Bol. Roy. Soc. Esp. Hist. Natur. Madrid 61(2), 263–285 (1963).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    M. A. Voinstvenskii, “Fossil Ornithofauna of Ukraine,” Prir. Obstan. Fauny Proshl. 3, 3–76 (1967).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    H. K. Yeh, “Fossil Birds from Linqu, Shandong,” Vertebr. Palasiat. 18(2), 116–125 (1980).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    N. V. Zelenkov and E. N. Kurochkin, “Neogene Phasianids (Aves: Phasianidae) of Central Asia: 1. Genus Tologuica gen. nov.,” Paleontol. Zh., No. 2, 86–92 (2009a) [Paleontol. J. 43, 208–215 (2009a)].Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    N. V. Zelenkov and E. N. Kurochkin, “Neogene Phasianids (Aves: Phasianidae) of Central Asia: 2. Genera Perdix, Plioperdix, and Bantamyx,” Paleontol. Zh., No. 3, 83–90 (2009b) [Paleontol. J. 43, 318–325 (2009b)].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Borissiak Paleontological InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations