Paleontological Journal

, Volume 43, Issue 10, pp 1202–1216 | Cite as

Istchenkophyton filiciforme gen. et sp. nov., a new small vascular plant with thick cuticle from the Devonian of Voronezh Region (European Russia)

  • A. V. Broushkin
  • N. V. Gordenko


Remains of a new small vascular plant, Istchenkophyton filiciforme gen. et sp. nov., are described from the Upper Givetian strata of Pavlovsk vicinity (Voronezh Region). The plant is characterized by a very thick cuticle (up to 300 μm), complex branching pattern, similar to that of a frond rachis, anomocytic stomata, and a well-developed vascular bundle with a central elongated in transversal section protoxylem strand and massive metaxylem composed chiefly of scalariform bordered-pitted tracheids. A reconstruction of the new plant is proposed; its ecology and systematic position are considered. In the light of new data relationships of problematic Devonian plants with thick cuticle are discussed.

Key words

Middle Devonian Voronezh Region plant fossils Spongiophytales morphology anatomy ecology 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    W. G. Chaloner, M. K. Mensah, and M. D. Crane, “Non-Vascular Land Plants from the Devonian of Ghana,” Palaeontology 17(4), 925–947 (1974).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Z. F. Ergolskaya, “Petrographic Research of the Barzas Coals of the Kuznetsk Basin,” Tr. TsNIGRI, No. 70, 5–54 (1936) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    P. G. Gensel and N. G. Johnson, “The Cuticular Structure and Stomatal Organization of Orestovia sp. cf. O. petzii from the Kuznetsk Basin, Western Siberia,” Palaeontogr. Abt. B 233(1–6), 1–10 (1994).Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    P. G. Gensel, W. G. Chaloner, and W. H. Forbes, “Spongiophyton from the Late Lower Devonian of New Brunswick and Quebec, Canada,” Palaeontology 34(1), 149–168 (1991).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. V. Gomankov, A. V. Kosmakova, and M. V. Leonov, “New Data on Devonian Plants of the Genus Orestovia,” in Toporkov Memorial Lectures (International Scientific Conference on Mining and Geology), Kazakhstan, Rudnyi, 2004, Issue 6 (Rudnenskii Ind. Inst., Rudnyi, 2004), pp. 229–240 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. A. Istchenko and A. A. Istchenko, Middle Devonian Flora of the Voronezh Anteclise (Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1981) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. A. Krassilov, “Orestovia and the Origin of Vascular Plants,” Lethaia 14(3), 235–250 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. A. Krassilov, M. G. Raskatova, and A. A. Istchenko, “A New Archaeopteridalean Plant from the Devonian of Pavlovsk, U.S.S.R.,” Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 53(1–2), 163–173 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Kräusel, “Spongiophyton nov. gen. (Thallophyta) und Haplostigma Seward (Pteridophyta) im Unter-Devon von Paraná,” in Paleontologia do Paraná. Volume Comemorativo do 1° Centenário do Estado Paraná, Ed. by F. W. Lange (Comiss o do Comemoraç es do Centenário do Paraná, Curitiba, 1954), pp. 195–210.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Kräusel and B. S. Venkatachala, “Devonische Spongiophytaceen aus Ost- und West-Asien,” Senckenberg. Leth. 47(3), 215–236 (1966).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. V. Meyen, “Fundamentals of Palaeobotany” (Chapman and Hall, London-New York, 1987).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Obrhel, “Flora dalejsk ch vrstev st edo eského devonu,” Sb. Úst ed. Ústavu Geol. Oddíl Paleontol., 23, 523–545 (1957).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. A. Rzhonsnitskaya, “Devonian Stage Boundaries on the East European (Russian) Platform,” Cour. Forsch.-Inst. Senckenberg. 225, 227–237 (2000).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    E. W. Sinnott, Plant Morphogenesis (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1960).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    N. S. Snigirevskaya, “On the Interpretation of Orestovia voronejiensis T. Istshenko et A. Istshenko (Middle Devonian, Voronezh Anteclise) As a Higher Plant,” Paleontol. Zh., No. 4, 133–137 (1993) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    N. S. Snigirevskaya and Y. S. Nadler, “Habit and Relationships of Orestovia (Middle Devonian),” Palaeontogr. Abt. B 233(1–6), 11–18 (1994).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    F. W. Sommer, “Spongiophytales, uma nova ordem de talófitas, da classe fóssil dos Algomycetes,” Anais Acad. Bras. Ciénc., Rio de Janeiro 31(4), 43 (1959).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    W. E. Stein, G. D. Harmon, and F. M. Hueber, “Spongiophyton from the Lower Devonian of North America Reinterpreted As a Lichen,” Am. J. Bot. 80(Suppl.), 93 (1993).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    W. A. Taylor, C. Free, C. Boyce, et al., “SEM Analysis of Spongiophyton Interpreted As a Fossil Lichen,” Int. J. Plant Sci. 165(5), 875–881 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. D. Zalessky, “Natural History of One Coal Type,”, Tr. Geolkom, Nov. Ser., No. 139, 1–75 (1915) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zonal Stratigraphy of the Phanerozoic of Russia, Ed. by T. N. Koren’ (Izd. VSEGEI, St. Petersburg, 2006) [in Russian].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Karpinsky Russian Geological Research Institute (VSEGEI)St. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Borissiak Paleontological Institute of the Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations