Advertisement

Paleontological Journal

, Volume 41, Issue 4, pp 451–460 | Cite as

New data on late Miocene mammals of Kohfidisch, Austria

  • I. A. Vislobokova
Article

Abstract

Cervids and bovids of the Early Turolian mammalian fauna of Kohfidisch (Austria) are reviewed. A new species, Micromeryx mirus sp. nov. (Moschidae) is described.

Key words

Cervidae Bovidae Turolian Late Miocene Austria 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Agusti and L. Cabrera, M. Carcés, et al., “A Calibrated Mammal Scale for the Neogene of Western Europe: State of the Art,” Earth Sci. Rev. 52, 247–260 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. Azanza, “Estudio geologico y paleontologico del Mioceno del sector oeste de la Comarca de Borja,” in Cuadernos de estudios borjanos (Centro Estud. Borjanos, Borja, 1986), pp. 63–126.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. Azanza, “Los Cervidae (Artiodactyla, Mammalia) del Mioceno de las Cuencas del Duero, Tajo, Calatayud-Teruel y Levante,” Mem. Mus. Paleontol. Univ. Zaragoza, No. 8, 1–376 (2000).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. Azanza and P. Montoya, “A New Deer from the Lower Turolian of Spain,” J. Paleontol. 69(6), 1163–1175 (1995).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. Bachmayer and R. W. Wilson, “Die Fauna der altpliozänen Höhlen-und Spaltenfüllungen bei Kohfidisch, Burgenland (österreich),” Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien 74, 533–587 (1970).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    F. Bachmayer and R. W. Wilson, “A Second Contribution to the Small Mammal Fauna of Kohfidisch, Austria,” Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien 81, 129–161 (1978).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. Bachmayer and R. W. Wilson, “Environmental Significance the Stratigraphic Position of Some Mammal Faunas in the Neogene of Eastern Austria,” Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien. A 87, 101–114 (1985).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Bachmayer and H. Zapfe, “Die Fauna der altpliozänen Höhlen-und Spaltenfüllungen bei Kohfidisch, Burgenland (österreich),” Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien 73, 123–139 (1969).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    F. Bachmayer and H. Zapfe, “Die Fauna der altpliozänen Höhlen-und Spaltenfüllungen bei Kohfidisch, Burgenland (österreich),” Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien 76, 19–27 (1972).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. Bohlin, “Cavicornia der Hipparion Fauna Nord Chinas,” Paleontol. Sin. Ser. C 9(4), 1–166 (1935).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. Bonis and G. D. Koufos, “The Miocene Large Mammal Succession in Greece,” in The Evolution of Neogene Terrestrial Ecosystems in Europe (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1999), pp. 205–237.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Bouvrain, “Antilopes a chevilles spiralées du Miocène supérieur de la province Gréco-Iranienne: nouvelles diagnoses,” Ann. Paléontol. 78, 49–65 (1992).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. Bouvrain, “Un Bovidé, du Turolien inférieur d’Europe orientale: Tragoportax rugosifrons,” Ann. Paleontol. 80, 61–87 (1994).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Bouvrain, “Les gazelles du Miocène supérieur de Macèdoine, Grèce,” Neues. Jahrb. Geol. Paläontol. Abh. 199(1), 111–132 (1996).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. Bouvrain, “Les bovidès du Miocène supérieur de Pentalophos (Macedoine, Grèce),” Münch. Geowiss. Abh. A 34, 5–22 (1997).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. Bouvrain, “Les bovidés (Mammalia, Artiodactyla) des gisements du Miocène supérieur de Vathylakkos (Grèce du Nord),” Neues. Jahrb. Geol. Paläontol. Abh. 220(2), 225–244 (2001).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    H. Bruijn, R. Daams, G. Daxner-Höck, et al., “Report of the RCMNS Working Group on Fossil Mammals, Reisenburg 1990,” Newsl. Stratigr. 26(2–3), 65–118 (1992).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. Daams, L. Alcalá, M. A. Alvarez, et al., “A Stratigraphical Framework for Miocene (MN4–MN13) Continental Sediments of Central Spain,” Comp. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris 327, 625–631 (1998).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    G. Daxner-Höck, “Faunenewandel im Obermiozäan und Korrelation der MN-’Zonen’ mit den Biozonen des Pannons der Zentralen Paratethys,” Beitr. Paläontol. 21, 1–9 (1996).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    G. Daxner-Höck, “Early and Late Miocene Correlation (Central Paratethys),” Ber. Inst. Geol. Paläontol. Karl-Franzens-Univ. Graz., No. 4, 28–33 (2001).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    G. Daxner-Höck, “Palaeoenvironmental History of the Vallesian and Early Turolian Reflected by Vertebrate Assemblages in the Vienna and Pannonian Basins,” in EEDEN—Environments and Ecosystem Dynamics of the Eurasian Neogene: Birth of the New World, Stara Lesna, Slovakia, November 12–16 (Univ. Komenskeho, Bratislava, 2003), pp. 38–39.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    G. Daxner-Höck, “Flying Squirrels (Pteromyinae, Mammalia) from the Upper Miocene of Austria,” Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien. A 106, 387–423 (2004).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    E. L. Dmitrieva, Antelopes from the Neogene of Mongolia (Nauka, Moscow, 1977) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. L. Franzen and G. Storch, “Late Miocene Mammals from Central Europe,” in The Evolution of Neogene Terrestrial Ecosystems in Europe (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1999), pp. 164–190.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    L. K. Gabunia, Belomechetskaya Fauna of Fossil Vertebrates (Metsniereba, Tbilisi, 1973) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    A. W. Gentry, “The Earliest Goats and Other Antelopes from the Samos Hipparion Fauna,” Bull. Brit. Mus. (Natur. Hist.) 20, 229–296 (1971).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. W. Gentry, “Ruminantia (Artiodactyla),” in Geology and Paleontology of the Miocene Sinap Formation, Turkey (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 2003), pp. 332–379.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    A. W. Gentry, G. E. Rössner, and E. P. J. Heizmann, “Suborder Ruminantia,” in The Miocene Land Mammals of Europe (Pfeil, München, 1999), pp. 225–258.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    D. Geraads, “Ruminants, Other Than Giraffidae from the Middle Miocene Hominoid Locality of Candir (Turkey),” Cour. Forsch.-Inst. Senkenb. 240, 181–199 (2003).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    A. Ya. Godina, V. I. Gromova, I. I. Sokolov, et al., “Artiodactyls,” in Fundamentals of Paleontology: Mammals (Gos. Nauch.-Tekhn. Izdat., Moscow, 1962), pp. 337–410 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    O. Kadic, “Die fossile Säugetierfauna der Umgebung des Balatonsees. Resultate der Wissenchaftl. Erforschung des Balatonsees,” Paläontol. Abh. 1(1), 1–8 (1911).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    M. Köhler, “Boviden des türkischen Miozäns (Känozoikum und Bräunkohlen der Türke),” Paleontol. Evol. 21, 33–246 (1987).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    E. L. Korotkevich, “A New Roe Deer Species from the Meotian of Ukraine,” Paleontol. Zh., No. 4, 60–67 (1965).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    E. L. Korotkevich, Neogene Deer of the Northern Black Sea Region (Nauk. Dumka, Kiev, 1970) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    E. L. Korotkevich, History of the Formation of the Hipparion Fauna in Eastern Europe (Nauk. Dumka, Kiev, 1988) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    G. D. Koufos, “Late Miocene Mammal Events and Biostratigraphy in the Eastern Mediterranean,” Deinsea 10, 343–268 (2003).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    D. Koustopoulos and G. D. Koufos, “The Bovidae (Mammalia, Artiodactyla) of Nikiti-2 (Nik) Faunal Assemblage (Chalkidiki Peninsula, N. Greece),” Ann. Paléontol. 85, 193–218 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    T. V. Krakhmalnaya, Hipparion Fauna of the Ancient Meotian of the Northern Black Sea Region (Nauk. Dumka, Kiev, 1996) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    M. Kretzoi, “Neue Antilopen-Form aus dem Soproner Sarmat,” Földt. Közl. 71, 336–343 (1941).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    M. Kretzoi, “Rapport final des fouilles paleontologiques dans la grotte de Csákvár,” Földt. Inst. Evi. Jel. (1952), 55–68 (1954).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    M. Kretzoi, “Wichtigere Streufunde aus der wirbeltierpalaontologischen Sammlung der Ungarischen Geologischen Anstalt (7): Funde der Hipparion-Faunen im Pannon des Karpathen-Becken,” Magy. All. Földt. Inst. Evi. Jel., 385–394 (1980).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    A. N. Lungu, Hipparion Fauna of the Middle Sarmatian of Moldova (Shtiintsa, Chisinau, 1984) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    M. C. McKenna and S. K. Bell, Classification of Mammals above the Species Level (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1997).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    J. Morales, S. Moya-Sola, and D. Soria, “Presencia de la familia Moschidae (Artiodactyla, Mammalia) en el Vallesiense de España: Hispanomeryx duriensis novo gen. nova sp,” Estud. Geol. 37, 467–475 (1981).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    S. Moyà-Solà, “Los Boselaphini (Bovidae, Mammalia) del Neógeno de la peninsula Ibérica,” Publ. Geol. Univ. Autonoma Barcelona 18, 1–236 (1983).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    S. Moyà-Solà, “El genero Hispanomeryx Morales et al. (1981): posición filogenética y systemática. Su contribución al conocimiento de la evolución de los Pecora (Artiodactyla, Mammalia),” Paleontol. Evol. 20, 267–287 (1986).Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    M. A. Pevzner, A. N. Lungu, E. A. Vangengeim, and A. E. Basilyan, “Position of Vallesian Localities of the Hipparion Fauna of Moldova on the Magnetochronological Scale,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Geol., No. 4, 50–59 (1987).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    H. Pohlig, “Cervus (Axis) loczyi Pohlig n. sp.: Die fossile Saugetierfauna der Umgebung des Balatonsees,” Palaeontol. Abh., 1–8 (1911).Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    G. Rabeder, “Die Säugetiere des Pontien in österreich und Ungam,” in Chronostratigraphie und Neostratotypen Pliozan, Pontian (Jazu and Sanu, Zagreb-Beograd, 1989), pp. 821–836.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    G. G. Simpson, “The Principles of Classification and a Classification of Mammals,” Bull. Am. Mus. Natur. Hist. 85, 1–350 (1945).Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    N. Solounias, “The Turolian Fauna from the Island of Samos, Greece,” Contrib. Vertebr. Evol. 6, 1–232 (1981).Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    N. Spassov and D. Geraads, “Tragoportax Pilgrim, 1937 and Miotragocerus Stromer, 1928 (Mammalia, Bovidae) from the Turolian of Hadjidimovo, Bulgaria, and a Revision of the Late Miocene Mediterranean Boselaphini,” Geodiversitas 26(2), 339–370 (2004).Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    E. Thenius, “Zur Kenntnis der fossilen Hirsche des Wiener Beckens, unter besonder Berücksichtigung ihrer stratigraphischen Bedeuntung,” Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien 56, 262–308 (1948a).Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    E. Thenius, “Über die Entwicklung des Hornzapfen von Miotragocerus,” Sitz. Österreich. Akad. Wiss. Math.-Naturwiss. Kl. I 157, 203–221 (1948b).Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    E. Thenius, “Die tertiären Lagomeryciden und Cerviden der Steiermark Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Säugetierrestene des Steirischen Tertiärs,” Sitz. österreich. Akad. Wiss. Math.-Naturwiss. Kl. I 159, 219–254 (1950).Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    E. Thenius, “Ein Geweihrest aus dem Pannon des Burgenlandes,” // Burgenländ. Heimatblätter. 18(4), 145–148 (1956).Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    I. Vislobokova, “New Species of Orygotherium (Palaeomerycidae, Ruminantia) from the Miocene of Eurasia,” Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien. A 106, 371–385 (2004).Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    I. Vislobokova and G. Daxner-Höck, “The Importance of Late Miocene Faunal Exchanges Between Eastern Mediterranean Areas and Central Europe,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Eastern Mediterranean Geology (Thessaloniki, 2004), Vol. 1, pp. 363–364.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    I. A. Vislobokova and N. P. Kalmykov, “To the History of the Roe Deer,” in Palaeotheriology (Nauka, Moscow, 1994), pp. 214–235 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    H. Zapfe, “Die Säugetierfauna aus dem Unterpliozän von Gaiselberg bei Zistersdorf in Niederösterreich,” Jahrb. Geol. Bundesanst., Nos. 1–2, 83–97 (1948).Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    H. Zapfe, “Ein bemerkenswertes Cervidengeweih aus dem Pannon des Burgenlandes, Österreicheich,” Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien. A 98, 173–177 (1997).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. A. Vislobokova
    • 1
  1. 1.Paleontological InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations