Paleontological Journal

, Volume 41, Issue 4, pp 395–406 | Cite as

Mollusks and small mammals from the Kuznetsovka locality, Pleistocene of the Oka-Don Plain

  • A. K. Agadjanian
  • P. E. Kondrashov


Kuznetsovka, a very rich locality of Interglacial mollusks and small mammals overlies the Donian Glacial strata of the Oka-Don Plain. Mollusks and small mammal from this locality are described in detail. The crucial stage in the development of Middle Pleistocene mollusk and mammal faunas is investigated. The data obtained allow the dating of fossiliferous deposits and reconstruction of sedimentation and environmental conditions of the fauna. The comparison of the Kuznetsovka Fauna with materials from central and western Europe permits its direct correlation with the fauna of the Cromerian stratotype in West Runton (Norfolk, England). Thus, the deposits of the Kuznetsovka section were formed during the second half of the early Middle Pleistocene.

Key words

Paleogeography small mammals arvicolids mollusks Middle Pleistocene Russia 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A. K. Agadjanian, L. I. Bazilevskaya, N. S. Bolikhovskaya, et al., Sections in the Glacial Regions of the Central Russian Plain (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1977) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. A. Aseev, Paleogeography of the Middle and Lower Okskaya Plain in the Quaternary Period (Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow, 1959) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. V. Beriozkina, O. V. Levina, and Ya. I. Starobogatov, “Revision of Bithyniidae from European Russia and Ukraine,” Ruthenica 5(1), 27–38 (1995).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    O. Fejfar, “Die Nager aus den Kiesen von Süßenborn bei Weimar,” Paläontol. Abh. Abt. A 3(3/4), 761–770 (1969).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Gittenberger, A. W. Janssen, W. J. Kuijer, et al., De Nederlandse Zoetwatermollusken: Recente en fossiele weekdieren uit zoet en brak water: Nederlanse Fauna 2: Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum Naturalis (KNNV Uitgeverij and EIS-Nederland, Leiden, 2004).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. N. Grischenko, “On Paleogeography of the Don Basin in the Neogene and Quaternary of the USSR,” Mat. Chetvertichn. Per. SSSR, No. 3, 145–157 (1952).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. N. Grishchenko, “Correlation of the Quaternary Beds of the Don and Volga Basin,” Tr. Komiss. Izuch. Chetvertichn. Per., No. 13, 55–64 (1957).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    I. M. Gromov and I. Ya. Polyakov, Mammals: Voles (Microtinae) (Nauka, Leningrad, 1977) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. A. C. Hinton, “A Preliminary Account of the British Fossil Voles and Lemmings, with Some Remarks on the Pleistocene Climate and Geography,” Proc. Geol. Assoc. London 21, 489–507 (1910).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. A. C. Hinton, Monograph of the Voles and Lemmings (Microtinae) (Brit. Mus., London, 1926), Vol. 1.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. Jánossy and E. Krolopp, “Lower Pleistocene Mollusc and Vertebrate Fauna from the Gravel Pit of Gyòrûjfalu (NW Hungary),” Fòldt. Kòzl. 124(4), 403–440 (1994).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. H. Keen, “Significance of the Record Provided by Pleistocene Fluvial Deposits and Their Included Molluscan Faunas for Paleoenvironmental Reconstruction and Stratigraphy: Case Studies from the English Midlands,” Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol 80, 25–34 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. H. Keen, “Towards a Late Middle Pleistocene Non-Marine Molluscan Biostratigraphy for the British Isles,” Qartern. Sci. Rev. 20, 1657–1665 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. P. Kerney, “British Quaternary Non-Marine Mollusca: A Brief Review,” in British Quaternary Studies—Recent Advances (Clarendon, Oxford, 1977), pp. 1–297.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. V. Kholmovoi, R. V. Krasnenkov, Yu. I. Iosifova, et al., Upper Pliocene of the Upper Don Basin (Voronezh. Gos. Univ., Voronezh, 1985) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. V. Krasnenkov and A. K. Agadjanian, “The Lower Pleistocene of the Middle Don,” Byull. Komiss. Izuch. Chetvertichn. Per., No. 44, 69–83 (1975).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. V. Krasnenkov and A. K. Agadjanian, “Pliocene Small Mammals of the Uryv Locality on the Don River,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 226(2), 413–416 (1976).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. V. Krasnenkov, L. P. Aleksandrov, L. A. Shcherbakova, and A. L. Chepalyga, “New Paleontologically Characterized Sections of the Anthropogene Beds in the Basin of the Middle and Upper Don,” Mater. Geol. Polezn. Iskop. Tsentr. Raionov Evropeiskoi Chasti SSSR (Priokskoe, Moscow, 1970), No. 6, pp. 276–284 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. V. Krasnenkov, G. V. Kholmovoi, B. V. Glushkov, et al., Reference Sections of the Lower Pleistocene of the Upper Don Basin (Voronezh. Gos. Univ., Voronezh, 1984) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Kretzoi, “Die Nager und Lagomorphen von Voigstedt in Thüringen und ihre chronologische Aussage,” Paläontol. Abh. Abt. 2(2/3), 587–660 (1965).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    E. Krolopp, “Biostratigraphic Division of Pleistocene Formations in Hungary According to Their Mollusc Fauna,” Malacol. Newsletter, No. Suppl. 1, 17–78 (1995).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. I. Lopatnikov, “Some Questions of Paleogeography of the Middle Don Basin,” Mater. Geol. Polezn. Iskop. Tsentr. Raionov Evropeiskoi Chasti SSSR, No. 3, 34–41 (1960).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    V. Lozek, “Quartermollusken der Tschechoslowakei,” Rozpr. Ustred. Ustavu Geol. 31, 1–374 (1964).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    L. Lungershausen, “Notes on the Nature of the Quaternary Beds in the Southern Area of the Dnieper Glacier,” Tr. Komiss. Izuch. Chetvertichn. Per. 3, 125–158 (1933).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    K. K. Markov, G. I. Lazukov, and V. A. Nikolaev, Quarternary Period (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1965) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    T. Meijer and R. C. Preece, “Malacological Evidence Relating to the Insularity of the British Isles during the Quaternary,” Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ., No. 96, 89–110 (1995).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    T. Meijer and R. C. Preece, “Malacological Evidence Relating to the Stratigraphical Position of the Cromerian,” in The Early Middle Pleistocene in Europe (Balkema, Rotterdam, 1996), pp. 53–82.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    A. I. Moskvitin, “The Pleistocene of the Volga Basin,” Tr. Geol. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR 64, 1–261 (1962).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    A. I. Moskvitin, “The Pleistocene of the European Part of the USSR,” Tr. Geol. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR 165, 123–176 (1965).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    A. I. Moskvitin, “Stratigraphy of the Pleistocene of the European Part of the USSR,” Tr. Geol. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR 156, 1–236 (1967).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    A. I. Moskvitin, The Basic Sections of the Pleistocene of the Russian Plain (Nauka, Moscow, 1976) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    E. T. Newton, “Notes on the Vertebrata of the Pre-Glacial Forest Bed Series of the East of England,” Geol. Mag. 2(8), 256–259 (1881).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    E. T. Newton, The Vertebrata of the Forest Bed Series of Norfolk and Suffolk (Mem. Geol. Surv. UK, London, 1882).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    P. A. Nikitin, Pliocene and Quaternary Floras of the Voroenzh Region (Moscow-Leningrad, 1957) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    R. C. Preece, “The Molluscan Fauna of the Middle Pleistocene Interglacial Deposits at Little Oakley, Essex, and Its Environmental and Stratigraphic Implications,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. B 328(1248), 387–407 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    R. C. Preece, “Mollusca from Last Interglacial Fluvial Deposits of the River Thames at Trafalgar Square, London,” J. Quatern. Sci. 141, 77–90 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    R. C. Preece, “Molluscan Evidence for Differentiation of Interglacials within the ‘Cromerian Complex’,” Quatern. Sci. Rev. 20, 1643–1656 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    R. C. Preece and S. A. Parfitt, “The Cromer Forest-Bed Formation: New Thoughts on An Old Problem,” in The Quaternary of Norfolk and Suffolk: Field Guide (Quaternary Res. Assoc., London, 2000), pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    L. A. Prozorova and Ya. I. Starobogatov, “Genus Armiger Hartmann, 1840 (Family Planorbidae),” Ruthenica 5(2), 167–175 (1996).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    J. J. Puissegur, “Mollusques continentaux quaternaires de Bourgogne: Significations stratigraphiques et climatiques,” Mém. Geol. Univ. Dijon 3, 1–241 (1976).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    W. Rähle, “Altpleistozäne Molluskenfaunen aus den Zusamplattenschottern und ihrer Flumergeldecke vom Uhlenberg und Lauterbrunn (Iller-Lech-Platte, Bayerisch Schwaben),” Geol. Bavar. 99, 103–117 (1995).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    B. W. Sparks, “The Ecological Interpretation of Quaternary Non-Marine Mollusca,” Proc. Linn. Soc. London 172, pp. 71–80 (1961).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    B. W. Sparks, “Non-Marine Mollusca and Quaternary Ecology,” Okeanologiya 33, 87–98 (1964).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    A. J. Stuart, “Pleistocene History of the British Vertebrate Fauna,” Biol. Rev. 49, 225–266 (1974).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    A. J. Stuart, “The Vertebrate Fauna of the Type Cromerian,” Boreas 4, 63–76 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    A. J. Stuart, “A Comparison of the Middle Pleistocene Mammal Faunas of Voigstedt (German Democratic Republic) and West Runton (Norfolk, England),” Quartärpaläontologie 4, 155–163 (1981).Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    A. J. Sutcliffe and K. Kowalski, “Pleistocene Rodents of the British Isles,” Bull. Brit. Mus. Natur. Hist. (Geol.) 96, 127–140 (1976).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    R. G. West, S. M. Peglar, M. E. Pettit, and R. C. Preece, “Late Pleistocene Deposits at Block Fen, Cambridgeshire, England,” J. Quatern. Sci. 10, 285–310 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    S. A. Yakovlev, Fundamentals of Geology of the Quaternary Period of the Russian Plain (Gosgeoltekhizdat, Moscow, 1956) [in Russian].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. K. Agadjanian
    • 1
  • P. E. Kondrashov
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Paleontological InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Kirksville College of Osteopathic MedicineA.T. Still UniversityKirksvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations