Optics and Spectroscopy

, Volume 123, Issue 4, pp 615–623 | Cite as

Quantization of an electromagnetic field in two-dimensional photonic structures based on the scattering matrix formalism (S-quantization)

  • K. A. Ivanov
  • V. V. Nikolaev
  • A. R. Gubaydullin
  • M. A. Kaliteevski
Nonlinear and Quantum Optics


Based on the scattering matrix formalism, we have developed a method of quantization of an electromagnetic field in two-dimensional photonic nanostructures (S-quantization in the two-dimensional case). In this method, the fields at the boundaries of the quantization box are expanded into a Fourier series and are related with each other by the scattering matrix of the system, which is the product of matrices describing the propagation of plane waves in empty regions of the quantization box and the scattering matrix of the photonic structure (or an arbitrary inhomogeneity). The quantization condition (similarly to the onedimensional case) is formulated as follows: the eigenvalues of the scattering matrix are equal to unity, which corresponds to the fact that the set of waves that are incident on the structure (components of the expansion into the Fourier series) is equal to the set of waves that travel away from the structure (outgoing waves). The coefficients of the matrix of scattering through the inhomogeneous structure have been calculated using the following procedure: the structure is divided into parallel layers such that the permittivity in each layer varies only along the axis that is perpendicular to the layers. Using the Fourier transform, the Maxwell equations have been written in the form of a matrix that relates the Fourier components of the electric field at the boundaries of neighboring layers. The product of these matrices is the transfer matrix in the basis of the Fourier components of the electric field. Represented in a block form, it is composed by matrices that contain the reflection and transmission coefficients for the Fourier components of the field, which, in turn, constitute the scattering matrix. The developed method considerably simplifies the calculation scheme for the analysis of the behavior of the electromagnetic field in structures with a two-dimensional inhomogeneity. In addition, this method makes it possible to obviate difficulties that arise in the analysis of the Purcell effect because of the divergence of the integral describing the effective volume of the mode in open systems.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1995), p. 465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Loudon, Quantum Theory of Light (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2000).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. L. Ginzburg, Sov. Phys. Usp. 26, 713 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. A. Kaliteevskii, V. A. Mazlin, K. A. Ivanov, and A. R. Gubaydullin, Opt. Spectrosc. 119, 832 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. M. Purcell, Phys. Rev. 69, 681 (1946).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Coccioli, M. Boroditsky, K. W. Kim, Y. Rahmat-Samii, and E. Yablonovitch, IEE Proc. Optoelectron. 145, 391 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. G. Philbin, New J. Phys. 12, 123008 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. G. Suttorp, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40, 3697 (2007).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. A. Kaliteevskii, A. R. Gubaydullin, K. A. Ivanov, and V. A. Mazlin, Opt. Spectrosc. 121, 410 (2016).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. De Martini, M. Marrocco, P. Mataloni, L. Crescentini, and R. Loudon, Phys. Rev. A 43, 2480 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. M. Bell, J. B. Pendry, L. M. Moreno, and A. J. Ward, Comput. Phys. Commun. 85, 306 (1995).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. B. Pendry, J. Mod. Opt. 41, 209 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. A. Ivanov
    • 1
  • V. V. Nikolaev
    • 2
  • A. R. Gubaydullin
    • 1
    • 3
  • M. A. Kaliteevski
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.ITMO UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Ioffe Physical Technical InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia
  3. 3.St. Petersburg Academic UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations