Optics and Spectroscopy

, Volume 113, Issue 4, pp 446–450

Analysis of the informativeness of polarization and nephelometric measurements in diagnostics of the microphysical parameters of erythrocytes

Geometrical and Applied Optics

Abstract

Regression relations are found between the microphysical parameters (MPPs) of human blood erythrocytes and the angular coefficients of linear polarization P(Θ), as well as between the MPPs of erythrocytes and angular coefficients of linear polarization P(Θ) together with the directional scattering coefficients β(Θ). The efficiency of using these regression relations for determining the MPPs of erythrocytes is estimated. It is shown that the involvement of polarization measurements allows one to reduce the error in the retrieval of MPPs, as well as of the size and volume distribution functions, to ∼3%.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Gitter and L. Hellmeyer, Taschenbuch Klinischer Funktions Prufungen (Veb Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, 1965; Meditsina, Moscow, 1966).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. M. Abdulkadyrov, S. S. Bessmel’tsev, and N. Yu. Lyubimova, Terapevticheskii Arkhiv, No. 7, 125 (1991).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Clark, N. Mohandas, and S. Shohet, Blood 61, 899 (1983).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. N. Lopatin, A. V. Priezzhev, A. Yu. Afanasenko, et al., Light Scattering Methods in Analysis of Dispersive Biological Media (Moscow, 2004) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. S. Ivlev and Yu. A. Dovgalyuk, Physics of Atmospheric Aerosol Systems (St. Petersburg, 1999) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. M. Kugeiko and S. A. Lysenko, Elektronika-Info, No. 8, 39 (2006).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. M. Kugeiko and S. A. Lisenko, Zh. Prikl. Spektrosk. 74(3), 386 (2007).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. M. Kugeiko and S. A. Lisenko, Zh. Prikl. Spektrosk. 74(5), 652 (2007).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Ya. Khairullina, Doctoral Dissertation (Minsk, 1998).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. V. Lopatin, A. V. Priezzhev, and V. V. Fedoseev, Biomed. Radioelektron., No. 7, 29 (2000).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. N. Yaroslavsky and H. J. Schwarzmaier, J. Biomed. Opt. 4(47), 1175 (1999).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Rogan, M. Friebel, K. Dorschel, A. Hahn, and G. Muller, J. Biomed. Opt. 4(36), 1270 (1999).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. I. Mishcenko, L. D. Travis, and A. A. Lacis, Scattering, Absorption, and Emission of Light by Small Particles (New York, 2004).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Ya. Khairullina and S. F. Shumilina, Zh. Prikl. Spektrosk. 19(3), 340 (1973).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    I. A. Kassirskii and G. A. Alekseev, Clinical Methodology (Moscow) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. M. Kugeiko and S. A. Lisenko, Opt. Spectrosc. 105(1), 147 (2008).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. M. Kugeiko and S. A. Lisenko, Opt. Spectrosc. 104(4), 630 (2008).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    C. F. Bohren and D. R. Huffman, Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles (Wiley, New York, 1983; Mir, Moscow, 1986).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    V. A. Kolemaev and V. N. Kalinina, Theory of Probability and Mathematical Statistics (INFRA-M, Moscow, 1997) [in Russian].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Belarusian State UniversityMinskBelarus

Personalised recommendations