Advertisement

Optics and Spectroscopy

, Volume 103, Issue 2, pp 245–251 | Cite as

Characterization of unwanted noise in realistic cavities

  • A. A. SemenovEmail author
  • D. Yu. Vasylyev
  • W. Vogel
  • M. Khanbekyan
  • D. -G. Welsch
Decoherence Problem
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

The problem of the description of absorption and scattering losses in high-Q cavities is studied. The considerations are based on quantum noise theories, hence the unwanted noise associated with scattering and absorption is taken into account by introduction of additional damping and noise terms in the quantum Langevin equations and input-output relations. Completeness conditions for the description of the cavity models obtained in this way are studied and corresponding replacement schemes are discussed.

PACS numbers

42.50.Lc 42.50.Nn 42.50.Pq 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics, Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, Supl. 2, Ed. by P. Berman (Academic, New York, 1994).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. J. Hood, H. J. Kimble, and J. Ye, Phys. Rev. A 64, 033804 (2001).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Khanbekyan, L. Knöll, A. A. Semenov, et al., Phys. Rev. A 69, 043807 (2004).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. K. Law and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1055 (1995).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. Lange and H. J. Kimble, Phys. Rev. A 61, 063817 (2000).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. J. Collett and C. W. Gardiner, Phys. Rev. A 30, 1386 (1984); C. W. Gardiner and M. J. Collett, Phys. Rev. A 31, 3761 (1985).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. Knöll, W. Vogel, and D.-G. Welsch, Phys. Rev. A 43, 543 (1991).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. W. F. van der Plank and L. G. Suttorp, Phys. Rev. A 53, 1791 (1996).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. M. Dutra and G. Nienhuis, Phys. Rev. A 62, 063805 (2000).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Viviescas, and G. Hackenbroich, Phys. Rev. A 67, 013805 (2003); J. Opt. B 60, 211 (2004).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Khanbekyan, D.-G. Welsch, A. A. Semenov, and W. Vogel, J. Opt. B 7, S689 (2005).ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. A. Dubrovin, A. T. Fomenko, and S. P. Novikov, Modern Geometry: Methods and Applications (Springer, New York, 1992).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. A. Wu, M. Xiao, and H. J. Kimble, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 4, 1465 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. Semenov
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • D. Yu. Vasylyev
    • 1
    • 2
  • W. Vogel
    • 1
  • M. Khanbekyan
    • 3
  • D. -G. Welsch
    • 3
  1. 1.Institut für PhysikUniversität RostockRostockGermany
  2. 2.Institute of PhysicsNational Academy of Sciences of UkraineKievUkraine
  3. 3.Theoretisch-Physikalisches InstitutFriedrich-Schiller-Universität JenaJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations