Advertisement

Microbiology

, Volume 87, Issue 6, pp 857–864 | Cite as

The Effect of Short-Term Drying on Biofilm Formed in a Model Water Distribution System

  • M. Üstüntürk-Onan
  • S. Hoca
  • E. Ilhan-Sungur
EXPERIMENTAL ARTICLES
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

In this study the effect of short-term drying on biofilm-related bacteria was investigated. Biofilm formation was encouraged to develop for nine months in a model water-distribution system. Biofilms were analyzed monthly for enumeration of aerobic and anaerobic heterotrophic bacteria, and sulphate reducing bacteria (SRB) after 6, 24, 48, and 72 hours of exposure to drying. The numbers of live and dead bacteria were directly analyzed by epifluorescence microscopy. In addition, extracellular polysaccharide substances (EPS) extraction, carbohydrate analysis, and scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation were performed. The formation of a brown-colored, thin biofilm layer was observed on the inner surface of polypropylene pipes at the end of the experimental study. SEM micrographs showed that ruptures occurred in the biofilm layer due to effects of drying. The counts of aerobic heterotrophic bacteria and SRB in dried biofilm samples decreased significantly after 6 and 48 hours, respectively. According to 5-cyano-2,3-ditolyl-tetrazolium chloride (CTC) staining results, bacteria can remain viable for up to 72 hours after exposure to drying. The significant increase in the amount of carbohydrate after 48 hours of exposure to drying indicates that bacteria produce EPS as a protective mechanism against drying stress.

Keywords:

biofilm extracellular polysaccharide substances short-term drying sulphate reducing bacteria water distribution systems 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The model system was donated by Dizayn Teknik Plastic Pipes and Fittings Co. This work was supported by Scientific Research Project Coordination Unit of Istanbul University. Project numbers: FDP-2018-28949 and 2803.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Alkan, U., Teksoy, A., and Acar, Ö., Detection of the factors effecting bacterial regrowth in drinking water network, İTÜ dergisi, 2005, vol. 15, pp. 43–55.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allison, D.G., The biyofilm matrix, Biofouling, 2003, vol. 19, pp. 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amel, B.K.N., Amine, B., and Amina, B., Survival of Vibrio fluvialis in seawater under starvation conditions, Microbiol. Res., 2008, vol. 163, pp. 323–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Armon, R., Starosvetzky, J., Arbel, T., and Green, M., Survival of Legionella pneumophila and Salmonella typhimurium in biofilm systems, Water Sci. Technol., 1997, vol. 35, pp. 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Assere, A., Oulahal, N., and Carpentier, B., Comparative evaluation of methods for counting surviving biofilm cells adhering to a polyvinyl chloride surface exposed to chlorine or drying, J. Appl. Microbiol., 2008, vol. 104, pp. 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baş, D. and Türetgen, I., The effect of short time drying and temperature change on microbial biofilm formation in a model pipe rig feed with distributed network water, Türk Mikrobiyol. Cem. Derg., 2011, vol. 41, pp. 155–161.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Batte, M., Appenzeller, B.M.R., Grandjean, D., Fass, S., Gauthier, V., Jorand, F., Mathieu, L., Boualam, M., Saby, S., and Block, J.C., Biofilms in drinking water distribution systems, Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol., 2003, vol. 2, pp. 147–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Billi, D. and Potts, M., Life and death of dried prokaryotes, Res. Microbiol., 2001, vol. 153, pp. 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Burke, V., Robinson, J., Gracey, M., Petersen, D., and Partridge, K., Isolation of Aeromonas hydrophila from a metropolitan water supply: seasonal correlation with clinical isolates, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1984, vol. 48, pp. 361–366.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Campanac, C., Pineau, L., Payard, A., Baziard-Mouysset, G., and Roques, C., Interactions between biocide cationic agents and bacterial biofilms, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 2002, vol. 46, pp. 1469–1474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cochran, W.G., Estimation of bacterial densities by means of the “most probable number”, Biometrics, 1950, vol. 6, pp. 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dubois, M., Gilles, K.A., Hamilton, J.K., Rebers, P.A., and Smith, F., Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances, Anal. Chem., 1956, vol. 28, pp. 350–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ekinci, Ö., Konak, H., and Öztürk, E. A minimum head loss optimization strategy for water distribution networks, Jeodezi, Jeinformasyon ve Arazi Yönetimi Dergisi, 2005, vol. 92, pp. 44–54.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gagnon, G.A. and Slawson, R.M., An efficient biofilm removal method for bacterial cells exposed to drinking water, J. Microbiol. Methods, 1999, vol. 34, pp. 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ilhan-Sungur, E. and Çotuk, A., Microbial corrosion of galvanized steel in a simulated recirculating cooling tower system, Corros. Sci., 2010, vol. 52, pp. 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kooij, D.V.D., Lieverloo, J.H.M., Schellart, J., and Hiemstra, P., Maintaining quality without a disinfectant residual, Maintaining Disinfection, 1999, vol. 91, pp. 55–64.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee, W. and Characklis, W.G., Corrosion of mild steel under anaerobic biofilm, Corros. Sci., 1993, vol. 49, pp. 186–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Momba, M.N.B., Kfir, R., Venter, S.N., and Cloete, T.E., An overview of biofilm formation in distribution systems and its impact on the deterioration of water quality, Water SA, 2000, vol. 26, pp. 59–66.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Panoff, J.M., Thammavongs, B., Guéguen, M., and Boutibonnes, P., Cold stress responses in mesophilic bacteria, Cryobiol., 1998, vol. 36, pp. 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Peng, J.S., Tsai, W.C., and Chou, C.C. Inactivation and removal of Bacillus cereus by sanitizer and detergent, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 2002, vol. 77, pp. 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Postgate, J.R. The Sulphate-reducing Bacteria, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1984, 2nd ed.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Potts, M., Desiccation tolerance: a simple process?, Trends Microbiol., 2001, vol. 9, pp. 553–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reasoner, D.J. and Geldrich, E.E. A new medium for the enumeration and subculture of bacteria from potable water, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1985, vol. 49, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rodriguez, G.G., Phipps, D., Ishiguro, K., and Ridgway, H.F., Use of a fluorescent redox probe for direct visualization of actively respiring bacteria, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1992, vol. 58, pp. 1801–1808.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Signoretto, C., Lleò, M., Tafi, M.C., and Canepari, P., Cell wall chemical composition of Enterococcus faecalis in the viable but nonculturable state, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2000, vol. 66, pp. 1953–1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sutherland, I.W., Biosynthesis and composition of gram-negative bacterial extracellular and wall polysaccharides, Annu. Rev. Microbiol., 1985, vol. 39, pp. 243–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tuovinen, O.H. and Hsu, J.C., Aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms in tubercles of the Columbus, Ohio, water distribution system, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1982, vol. 44, pp. 761–764.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Türetgen, I., Ilhan-Sungur, E., and Çotuk, A., Effects of short-time drying on biofilm-associated bacteria, Ann. Microbiol., 2007, vol. 57, pp. 277–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Veenendaal, H.R. and Kooij, D., Biofilm Formation Potential of Pipe Materials in Plumbing Systems, Kiwa NV Res. Consult., The Netherlands, Min. Public Hous. Urban Plan. Environ., 1999.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhang, X., Bishop, P.L., and Kinkle, B.K., Comparison of extraction methods for quantifying extracellular polymers in biofilms, Water Sci. Technol., 1999, vol. 39, pp. 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Üstüntürk-Onan
    • 1
  • S. Hoca
    • 2
  • E. Ilhan-Sungur
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Fundamental and Industrial Microbiology Division, Istanbul UniversityVezneciler-IstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Institute of Sciences, Istanbul UniversityVezneciler-IstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations