Advertisement

Microbiology

, Volume 76, Issue 4, pp 413–420 | Cite as

Extracellular hydrolases of strain Bacillus sp. 739 and their involvement in the lysis of micromycete cell walls

  • G. E. Aktuganov
  • N. F. Galimzyanova
  • A. I. Melent’ev
  • L. Yu. Kuz’mina
Experimental Articles

Abstract

The mycolytic bacterial strain Bacillus sp. 739 produces extracellular enzymes which degrade in vitro the cell walls of a number of phytopathogenic and saprophytic fungi. When Bacillus sp. 739 was cultivated with Bipolaris sorokiniana, a cereal root-rot pathogen, the fungus degradation process correlated with the levels of the β-1,3-glucanase and protease activity. The comparative characteristic of Bacillus sp. 739 enzymatic preparations showed that efficient hydrolysis of the fungus cell walls was the result of the action of the complex of enzymes produced by the strain when grown on chitin-containing media. Among the enzymes of this complex, chitinases and β-1,3-glucanases hydrolyzed most actively the disintegrated cell walls of B. sorokiniana. However, only β-1,3-glucanases were able to degrade the cell walls of native fungal mycelium in the absence of other hydrolases, which is indicative of their key role in the mycolytic activity of Bacillus sp. 739.

Key words

mycolytic enzymes Bacillus spp. chitinase β-1,3-glucanase antagonism phytopathogenic fungi 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kozachko, I.A., V’yunitskaya, V.A., Berezhnitskaya, T.G., Reznik, S.R., and Smirnov, V.V., Endophytic Bacillus Bacteria as Prospective Cultures for Creation of the Biological Means of Plant Protection, Mikrobiol. Zhurn, 1995, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 69–78.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Weller, D.M., Biological Control of Soil-Borne Plant Pathogens in the Rhizosphere with Bacteria, Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 1988, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 379–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pleban, S., Ingel, F., and Chet, I., Control of Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotium rolfsii in the Greenhouse Using Endophytic Bacillus spp, Eur. J. Plant Pathol, 1995, vol. 101.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim, P.I. and Chung, K.-C., Production of an Antifungal Protein for Control of Colletotrichum lagenarium by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens MET0908, FEMS Microbiol. Letts., 2004, vol. 234, no. 5 (1), pp. 177–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huang, C.-J., Wang, T.-K., Chung, S.-C., and Chen, C.-Y., Identification of an Antifungal Chitinase from a Potential Biocontrol Agent, Bacillus cereus 28–9, J. Biochem. Mol. Biol., 2005, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 82–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nielsen, P. and Sørensen, J., Multi-Target and Medium-Independent Fungal Antagonism by Hydrolytic Enzymes in Paenibacillus polymyxa and Bacillus pumilus Strains from Barley Rhizoshere, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 1997, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smirnov, V.V., Reznik, S.R., and Vasilevskaya, I.A., Sporoobrazuyushchie aerobnye bakterii — produtsenty biologicheski aktivnykh veshchestv (Spore-Forming Aerobic Bacteria, Producers of Biologically Active Compounds), Kiev: Naukova dumka, 1982.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Podile, A.R. and Prakash, A.P., Lysis and Biological Control of Aspergillus niger by Bacillus subtilis AF1, Can. J. Microbiol., 1996, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 533–538.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Melent’ev, A.I., Usanov, N.G., and Loginov, O.N., RF Pat. 1743019 A 01 N 63/00, S 12 N 1/20, 1989, Bacterial Strain Bacillus sp. for Production of the Preparations Against Fungal Cereal Pathogens, Publ. 23.03.93.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Arkhipova, T.N., Investigation of the Cytokinines Produced by the Rhyzospheric Microorganisms, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Ufa: Bashkirskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, 1999.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morozov, Yu.M., Melent’ev, A.I., and Kuz’mina, L.Yu., Ultrastructure of Wheat Cells in the Course of Growth of Bacillus sp., the Active Component of the Batsispetsin BM Bacterial Inoculum, Fiziol. Rastenii, 1994, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 36–43.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Markovich, N.A. and Kononova, G.L., Lytic Enzymes of Trichoderma and Their Role in Plant Defense from Fungal Diseases: A Review, Prikl. Biokhim. Mikrobiol., 2003, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 389–400 [Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. (Engl. Transl.), vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 341–351].PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chernin LS. Basterial chitinases in biocontrol of plant pathogens, Materialy 6-i mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii “Novye dostizheniya v issledovanii khitina i khitozana”, Moskva — Shchelkovo, 22–24.10.2001 (Proc. 6th Intl. Conf. “New Advancements in the Study of Chitin and Chitosan”), Moscow: Izd-vo “VNIRO”, 2001.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Melent’ev, A.I., Aktuganov, G.E., and Galimzyanova, N.F., The Role of Chitinase in the Antifungal Activity of Bacillus sp. 739, Mikrobiologiya, 2001, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 636–641 [Microbiology (Engl. Transl.), vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 548–548].Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lorito, M., Peterbauer, C., Hayes, C., and Harman, G., Synergistic Interaction between Fungal Cell Wall Degrading Enzymes and Different Antifungal Compounds Enhances Inhibition of Spore Germination, Arch. Microbiol., 1994, vol. 140, no. 3, pp. 623–629.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aktuganov, G.E., Melent’ev, A.I., and Usanov, N.G., Production of the Chitinolytic Enzymatic Complex in Batc Culture of Bacillus sp. 739, Biotekhnologiya, 2001, no. 3, pp. 25–33.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ainsworth, Y.C., Sparrow, F.K., and Sussman, A.S., The Fungi. IV A. A Taxonomic Review with Keys: Ascomycetes and Fungi Iimperfecti; IV B. Basidiomycetes and Lower Fungi, New York, London: Academic Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sinitsyn, A.P., Chernoglazov, V.M., and Gusakov, A.V., Methods of Study and Properties of Cellulolytic Enzymes, Itogi Nauki I Tekhniki. Biotekhnologiya, 1993, VINITI vol. 25.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Helisto, P., Aktuganov, G., Galimzianova, N., Melentjev, A., and Korpela, T., Lytic Enzyme Complex of An Antagonistic Bacillus sp. X-b: Isolation and Purification of Components, J. Chromatogr. B, 2001, vol. 758, no. 2, pp. 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aktuganov, G.E., Shirokov, A.V., and Melent’ev, A.I., Isolation and Characterization of Chitosanase from the Strain Bacillus sp. 739, Prikl. Biokhim. I Mikrobiol, 2002, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 536–541 [Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. (Engl. Transl.), vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 469–474].Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Metody eksperimental’noi biologii. Spravochnik (Methods of Experimental Biology) Bilai, V.I., Ed., Kiev: Naukova dumka, 1982.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Peberdy, J.F., Fungal Cell Walls: a Review, in Biochemistry of Cell Walls and Membranes in Fungi, EKuhn, P.J., Trinchi, A.P.J., Jung, M.J., Goosey, M.V., Copping, L.G. et al., Eds., Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1990, pp. 5–24.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bertagnolli, B.L., Dal, Soglio F.K., and Sinclair, J.B., Extracellular Enzyme Profiles of the Fungal Pathogen Rhizoctonia solani Isolate 2B-12 and of Two Antagonists, Bacillus megaterium Strain B153-2-2 and Trichoderma harzianum Isolate Th008. I. Possible Correlations Between with Inhibition of Growth and Biocontrol, Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol., 1996, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. E. Aktuganov
    • 1
  • N. F. Galimzyanova
    • 1
  • A. I. Melent’ev
    • 1
  • L. Yu. Kuz’mina
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Biology, Ufa Research CenterRussian Academy of SciencesRussia

Personalised recommendations