Effects of Hypoxia or Dexamethasone at Different Gestation Periods on Fear Conditioning in Adult Rats

  • L. A. Vataeva
  • E. I. TyulkovaEmail author
  • A. N. Alekhin
  • V. A. Stratilov
Comparative and Ontogenic Physiology


We report here the long-term effects of deep hypobaric hypoxia or dexamethasone administration (0.8 mg/kg) endured at the early prenatal period of gestation (days 14–16 or 17–19) on contextual and cued fear conditioning in postnatal ontogenesis of male rats. Fear responses conditioned to a context or a cue (tone) were comparatively evaluated in the male offspring of rats exposed to hypoxia or injected with dexamethasone at different gestational ages. Hypoxic exposures at any period of early prenatal ontogenesis were found to entail no statistically significant differences in the offspring relative to control. During contextual fear conditioning or extinction, the freezing time increased relative to control in animals born to females that were injected with dexamethasone on gestational days 17–19. In an analogous test on fear conditioning to a tone, the freezing time decreased relative to control in rats born to females injected with dexamethasone on gestational days 14–16 and increased in those whose mothers were injected with dexamethasone on days 17–19. We suggest that effects induced by dexamethasone administration at both gestation periods were mainly due to the involvement of the amygdala nuclei. The effect of dexamethasone on contextual fear conditioning, which seems to be due to functional changes in the hippocampus, was only detected upon its injection on gestational days 17–19.

Key words

prenatal hypoxia dexamethasone ontogenesis learning 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kassil, V.G., Otellin, V.A., Khozhai, L.I., and Kostkin, V.B., Critical phases of the brain development, Ross. Fiziol. Zh., 2000, vol. 86, no. 11, pp. 1129–1136.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Otellin, V.A., Formation of brain pathologies during the embryonic period, Priroda, 2003, no. 9, pp. 30–35.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Golan, H. and Huleihel, M., The effect of prenatal hypoxia on brain development: short-and longterm consequences demonstrated in rodent models, Dev. Sci., 2006, vol. 9, pp. 338–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rice, D. and Barone, S., Critical periods of vulnerability for the developing nervous system: evidence from humans and animal models, Environ. Health Perspec., 2000, vol. 108, pp. 511–533.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dammann, O. and Matthews, S.G., Repeated antenatal glucocorticoid exposure and the developing brain, Pediatric Res., 2001, vol. 50, pp. 563–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Matthews, S.G., Owen, D., Banjanin, S., and Andrews, M.H., Glucocorticoids, hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) development, and life after birth, Endocrin. Res., 2002, vol. 28, pp. 709–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crowther, C.A. and Harding, J., Repeat doses of prenatal corticosteroids for women at risk of preterm birth for preventing neonatal respiratory disease, Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 2003, vol. 1. CD003935.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goldstein, J.M., Handa, R.J., and Tobet, S.A., Disruption of fetal hormonal programming (prenatal stress) implicates shared risk for sex differences in depression and cardiovascular disease, Front. Neuroendocrin., 2014, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 140–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dygalo, N.N., Sakharov, D.G., Kalinina, T.S., and Shishkina, G.T., Behavioral effects of single adverse exposure in a number of rat generations: the role of maternal glucocorticoids, Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 1999, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 489–494.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Seckl, J.R., Prenatal glucocorticoids and long-term programming, Eur. J. Endocrin., 2004, vol. 151, pp. 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wan, S., Hao, R., and Sun, K., Repeated maternal dexamethasone treatments in late gestation increases 11-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 expression in the hippocampus of the newborn rat, Neurosci. Lett., 2005, vol. 382, nos 2, 3, pp. 96–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dodic, M., Peers, A., Coghlan, J.P., and Wintour, M., Can excess glucocorticoid predispose to cardiovascular and metabolic disease in middle age? Trends Endocrin. Metab., 1999, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 86–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Whitelaw, A. and Thoresen, M., Antenatal steroids and the developing brain, Arch. Dis. Child Fetal Neonat. Ed., 2000, vol. 83, pp. 154–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Welberg, L.A., Seckl, J.R., and Holmes, M.C., Prenatal glucocorticoid programming of brain corticosteroid receptors and corticotrophin-releasing hormone: possible implications for behavior, Neurosci., 2001, vol. 104, pp. 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vataeva, E.I., Tyulkova, E.I., Khozhai, L.I., Otellin, V.A., and Samoilov, M.O., Training in the Morris water maze of female and male rats exposed to hypoxia at various periods of prenatal development, J. Evol. Biochem. Physiol., 2005, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 660–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tuylkova, E.I., Vataeva, L.A., Vetrovoy, O.V., and Romanovsky, D.Yu., Prenatal hypoxia modifies working memory and activity of the hippocampal polyphosphoinositide system in rats, J. Evol. Biochem. Physiol., 2015, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 131–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim, J.J. and Diamond, D.M., The stressed hippocampus, synaptic plasticity and lost memories, Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 2002, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 453–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sandi, C., Woodson, J.C., Haynes, V.F., Park, C.R., Touyarot, K., Lopez-Fernandez, M.A., Venero, C., and Diamond, D.M., Acute stress-induced impairment of spatial memory is associated with decreased expression of neural cell adhesion molecule in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, Biol. Psychiatry, 2005, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 856–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vazdarjanova, A. and McGaugh, J.L., Basolateral amygdala is not critical for cognitive memory of contextual fear conditioning, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1998, vol. 95, no. 25, pp. 15003–15007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Welberg, L.A., Seckl, J.R., and Holmes, M.C., Prenatal glucocorticoid programming of brain corticosteroid receptors and corticotrophin-releasing hormone: possible implications for behavior, Neurosci., 2001, vol. 104, pp. 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Muneoka, K., Mikuni, M., Ogawa, T., Kitera, K., Kamei, K., Takigawa, M., and Takahashi, K., Prenatal dexamethasone exposure alters brain monoamine metabolism and adrenocortical response in rat offspring, Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol., 1997, vol. 27, pp. 1669–1675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Naumenko, E.V., Dygalo, N.N., and Maslova, L.N., Long-term modification of stress reactivity by exposures during prenatal ontogenesis, Ontogeneticheskie i genetiko-evolyutsionnye aspekty neiroendokrinnoi regulyatsii stressa (Ontogenetic and Genetico-Evolutionary Aspects of Neuroendocrine Stress Regulation), Novosibirsk, 1990, pp. 40–55.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Delgado, M.R., Olsson, A., and Phelps, E.A., Extending animal models of fear conditioning to humans, Biol. Psychol., 2006, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hermans, D., Craske, M.G., Mineka, S., and Lovibond, P.F., Extinction in human fear conditioning, Biol. Psychiatry, 2006, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 361–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hofmann, S.G., Cognitive processes during fear acquisition and extinction in animals and humans: implications for exposure therapy of anxiety disorders, Clin. Psychol. Rev., 2008, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kurylo, D.D., Effects of quinpirole on operant conditioning: perseveration of behavioral components, Behav. Brain. Res., 2004, vol. 155, no. 1, pp. 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ponnusamy, R., Nissim, H.A., and Barad, M., Systemic blockade of D2-like dopamine receptors facilitates extinction of conditioned fear in mice, Learn. Mem., 2005, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 399–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee, H.J., Choi, J.S., Brown, T.H., and Kim, J.J., Amygdalar NMDA receptors are critical for the expression of multiple conditioned fear responses, J. Neurosci., 2001, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 4116–4124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dubrovskaya, N.M. and Zhuravin, I.A., Specificity of ontogenetic development of behavior in rats subjected to prenatal hypoxia on days 14 or 18 of embryogenesis, Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat. im. I.P. Pavlova, 2008, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 718–727.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. A. Vataeva
    • 1
    • 2
  • E. I. Tyulkova
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. N. Alekhin
    • 2
  • V. A. Stratilov
    • 1
  1. 1.Pavlov Institute of PhysiologyRussian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Herzen State Pedagogical UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations