Advertisement

Journal of Evolutionary Biochemistry and Physiology

, Volume 50, Issue 5, pp 363–382 | Cite as

Development of socialty in the bee superfamily (Hymenoptera, Apoidea)

  • E. K. Eskov
Review

Abstract

Regularities of the appearance of family in the bee superfamily have been analyzed. It is shown that conversion in highly organized eusocial bee species into the biological unit is coupled to perfection of instincts of care of offspring of the female-founderer, an increase of its lifespan, with strengthening of various forms of domination. The concept is substantiated that development of offspring of dominating females under similar conditions ruling out the intranest competition as well as strengthening of interconnection and interdependence between members of the family have led to the appearance of family selection.

Key words

evolution bee family socialty instincts competition consolidation domination. 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rasnitsin, A.P., Origin and evolution of Hymenoptera, Moscow, Nauka, 1980, 191 p.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rasnitsin, A.P., Order Vespidae. Hymenoptera, History of Development of Class of Insecta, Moscow, Nauka, 1980, pp. 122–126.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brothers, D.J., Phylogeny and classification of the aculeate Hymenoptera, with special reference to Mutillidae, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 1975, vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 483–648.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dietz, A., Evolution, Rinderer, T.E., Ed., Bee Genetics and Breeding. London: Acad. Press, 1986, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Michener, C.D., Comparative external morphology, and a classification of the bees (Hymenoptera), Bull. Amer. Mus. Natur. Hist., 1944, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 151–326.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Michener, C.D., A classifications of the bees of the Australian and South Pacific regions, Bull. Amer. Mus. Natur. Hist., 1965, vol. 130, 362 p.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Michener, C.D., A taxonomic study of African allocating bees (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae, Ceratinini), Bull. Amer. Mus. Natur. Hist., 1975, vol. 155, no. 2, pp. 67–240.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Michener, C.D., Biogeography of the bees, Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard., 1979, vol. 66, pp. 277–347.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Radchenko, V.G. and Pesenko, Yu.A., Biology of Bees (Hymenoptera, Apoidea), St. Petersburg, 1994, 350 p.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Radchenko, V.G., New type of nest revealed in bee Metallinella atrocaerulea (Hymenoptera, Megahilidae), Entomol. Obozr., 1978, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 515–519.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pesenko, Yu.A., Leaf-cutting Bee Megachile rotunda and Its Breeding for Pollination of Medick, Moscow, Nauka, 1982, 136 p.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pesenko, Yu.A., About formation of population of single bees (Apoidea) on field of sown medick, Zool. Zh. 1976, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 856–859.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stephen, W.P. and Torchio, P.P., Biological observations on Emphoropsis miserabilis (Cresson), with comparative notes on other anthophorids (Hymenoptera: Apoidea), Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer., 1961, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 687–692.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sterhen, W.P., Bohart, G.E., and Torchio, P.S., The Biology and External Morphology of Bees. With a Synopsis of the Genera of Northwestern America, Corvallis: Oregon State Univ., 1969, 140 p.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    TsuneKi, K., Bionomics of some species of Megachile, Dasypoda, Colletes and Bombus (Hym.: Apoidae), Etizenia, 1970, no. 48, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maciel, A.C., Notes sur la biologic Heriades truncorum L. (Hymenoptcra, Megachilidae), Apidologie, 1976, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 169–187.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grozdanic, S., Biologische Untersuchungen an den Bienen Halictus sajoi (Bluthgen)-(Apoidea, Hymenoptera), Glas Prirod. Myseja Beograd, 1971, vol. 26, pp. 151–157.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fabre, J.H., Life of Insects, Moscow, Uchpedgiz, 1963, 459 p.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Scheloske, H.W., Untersuchungen über das Vorkommer, die Biologie und den Nestbau der Seidenbiene Colletes daviesanus Sm., Zool. Jb. (Abt. Syst.), 1974, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 153–I72.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maeta, Y., Tohoku nogyo schikenio kencyu hokoku, BulI. Tohoku Natur. Agr. Exp. Stat., 1979, no. 61, pp. 59–68.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vinson, S.V. and Frankie, G.W., Nest of Cantridini acthyctera (Hymenoptera: Apoidae: Anthophoridae) in the dry forest of Costa Rica, J. Kans. Entomol. Soc., 1977, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 301–311.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rust, R.W., Notes on the biology of North American species of Panurginus (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae), Pan-Pacif. Entomol., 1976, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 159–166.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Radchenko, V.G., Nesting of bee Nomioides minutissimus (Rossi) (Hymenoptera, Haliktidae), Entomol. Obozren., 1979, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 762–765.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Eickwort, G.C. and Eickwort, K.R., Aspects of the biology of Costa Rican halictine bees. V. Atigochlorella edentata (Hymenoptera: Halictidae), J. Kans. Entomol. Soc., 1973, vol. 46, no. l, pp. 3–16.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Blagoveshchenkaya, N.N., Study of Wild Bees in Nature and in Laboratory, Izd-Uliyanovskogo pedinstituta, 1983, 80 p.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Batra, S.W.T., Behavior of the alkali bee, Nomia melandcri, within the nest (Hymenoptera: Halictidae), Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer., 1970, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 400–406.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Batra, S.W.T., Nest of the solitary bee, Antophora antiope, in Punjab, India J. Kans. Entomol. Soc., 1980, vol. 53, no. l, pp. 112–114.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Norden, B., Batra, S.W.T., Fales, H.M., Hefetz, A., and Shaw, G.J., Anthophora bees: unusual glycosides from maternal Dufour’s glands serve as larval food and cell lining, Science, 1980, vol. 207, no. 4435, pp. 1095–1097.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wafa, A.K., Rashad, S., and Moustafa, M.A., On the nesting habits of Andrena ovatula (K) in Egypt (Hymenoptera, Apoidae), Deutsch. entomol. Ztsch., 1972, vol. 4/5, pp. 303–306.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mayer, D.F. and Johansen, C.A., Biological observations on Anthophora urbana Cresson (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae), Pan-Pacif. Entomol., 1976, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 120–125.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rust, R.W., The biology of Ptilothrix bombiformis (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae), J. Kansas Entomol. Soc., 1980, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 427–436.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Eskov, E.K., Etology of Honeybee, Moscow, Kolos, 1992, 336 pp.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Eskov, E,K. and Dolgov, L.V., Regulation of temperature in nest and its role in life of bumble-bee, Zool. Zh., 1986, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 1500–1507.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Janzen, D.H., The ecological significance of an arboreal nest of Bombus pullatus in Costa Rica, J. Kans. Entomol. Soc., 1971, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 210–216.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Alford, D.V., Egg laying by bumble bee queens at the beginning of colony development, Bee World, 1971, vol. 52, no. l, pp. 11–18.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dolgov, L.A., Peculiarities of Biology of Bumblebees Settling Artificial Nests. Insects-Pollinators of Agricultural Cultures, Novosibirsk, 1982, pp. 83–86.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Alford, D.V., Bumble-bees, London: Davis-Pointer, 1975, 352 p.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Richards, K.W., Biology of Bombus polaris Curtis and B. hyperboreus Schonherr at Lake Hazen, Northwest Territories (Hymenoplera: Bombini), Quaest. Entomol., 1973, vol. 9, pp. 115–157.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hobbs, G.A., Ecology of species of Bombus Latr. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in southern Alberta. II. Subgenus Bombias Robt., Canad. Entomol., 1965, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 120–128.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Free, J.B. and Butler, C.G., Bumblebees, London: Collins, 1959, 208 p.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sakagami, S.F., Specific difference in the bionomic characters of bumblebees. A comparative review, J. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Univ. (Ser. 6. Zool.), 1976, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 390–447.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sakagami, S.F., and Zucchi, R., Winterverhalten einer neotropischen Hummel, Bombus atratus, innerhalb des Beobachtungskastens. Ein Beitrag zur Biologie der Hummeln, J. Fac. Sci., Hokkado. Univ. Zool., 1965, vol. 6, pp. 712–762.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wille, A. and Michener, C.D., The nest architecture of stingless bees with special reference to those of Costa Rica (Hymenoptera; Apidae), Rev. Biol. Tropical. Univer. Costa Rica, 1973, vol. 21, no. l, pp. 279.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Darchen, R., Sur la biologie de Trigona (Apotrigona) nebulata komiensis Cock, J. Biol. Gabon, 1969, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 151–187.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Koeniger, N., Die Arten der Honigbiene, Allg. Dt. Imker-Ztg., 1976, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 89, 91–92.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bryan, M., Social Insects. Ecology and Behavior, Moscow. Mir, 1986, 400 p.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ihering, R., Biologie der stachellosen Honigbienen Brasiliens, Zool. Jahrb. Abt. System, 1903, vol. 19, pp. 179–287.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rooley, A.C. and Michener, C.D., Observations on nests of stingless honey-bees in Natal (Hymenoptera: Apidae), J. Entomol. Soc. South. Afr., 1969, vol. 32. P. 423–430.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Michener, C.D., The Social Behavior of the Bees, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1974, 404 p.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sommeijer, M.J., Beuvens, F.T., and Verbeek, H.J., Distribution of labour among workers of Melipona favosa F.: construction and provisioning of brood cells, Insects Sociaux, 1982, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 222–237.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Lindauer, M., The functional significance of the honeybee waggle dance, Amer. Natur., 1971, vol. 105, no. 942, pp. 89–96.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Eskov, E.K., Akustical Signalization of Social Insects, Moscow, Nauka, 1979, 209 p.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Eskov, E.K., Akustical signalization in communications of social insects, Usp. Sovrem. Biol., 1977, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 419–431.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Dulion, R. and Simpson, J., Producing honey with Apis florea in Oman, Bee World, 1977, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 71–76.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Butler, C.G., Family of honeybee and its evolution, Pchela i ulei, Moscow, Kolos, 1969, pp. 45–79.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Butani, D.K., An Apis dorsata colony in New Delhi, Indian Bee J., 1950, no. 12, p. 115.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kaiser, F., Riesenhonigbiene im Flugkafig besucht, Allg. Dt. Imker-Ztg., 1976, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 93–97.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Singh, S., Bee keeping in India, Indian Council of Agrium. Research Publ., New Delhi, 1962, 214 p.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Morse, R.A. and Laigo, F.M., Apis dorsata in the Philippines (including an annotated bibliography), Monograph of the Philippine Association of Entomologists, Inc., University of the Philippine, The College, Laguna, 1969, no. l, 96 p.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Petrov, E.M., Bashkir Carpenter Bee, Ufa, 1983, 200 p.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Eskov, E.K. and Eskova, M.D., Factors affecting size of cells of bee combs, Pchelovods., 2012, no. 8, pp. 19–21.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Houston, T.E., Discovery of on apparent male soldier caste in a nest of a halictine bee (Hymenoptera: Halictidae), with notes on the nest, Austral. J. Zool., 1970, vol. 18, pp. 345–351.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Houston, T.E., Nesting biology of three allodapine bees in the subgenus Exoncurella Michener (Hymenoptera: Amhophoridae), Trans. Roy. Soc. Austral., 1977, vol. 101, nos. 2–4, pp. 99–113.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Malyshev, S.I., History of life of bumble-bees community, Pchelovod. delo, 1928, no. 6, pp. 292–296.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Richards, O.W., The Social Insects, London: Mac-Donald, 1953, 219 p.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Michener, C.D. and Amir, M., The seasonal cycle and habitat of a tropical bumble-bee, Pacific. Insects, 1977, vol. 17, no. 2/3, pp. 234–240.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Ihering, R., Biologische Beobachtungen an brasilianischen Bombus-Nestern, Allgem. Zs. Entomol., 1903, vol. 8, pp. 447–453.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Brian, A.D., Brood development in Bombus agrorum (Hymenoptera, Bombidae), Entomol. Mon. Magazine, 1951, vol. 87, pp. 207–212.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Owen, R.E., Rodd, F.H., and Plowright, R.C., Sex ratios in bumble bee colonics: Complications due to orphaning?, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 1980, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 287–291.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Duchateau, M.J., Velthuis, H.W., and Boomsma, J.J., Sex ratio variation in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris, Behav. Ecol., 2004, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 71–82.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Darchen, R. and Delage-Darchen, B., Contribution a I’etude d’une abeille du Mexique Melipona beechii B. (Hymenoptere: Apidae), Apidologie, 1975, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 295–339.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Darchen, R., Essal dìnterpretation du determinisme castes chez les trigones et. les melipones, C. r. Acad. sci., 1973, vol. 276, no. 4, pp. 607–609.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Sakagami, S.F. and Maeta, Y., Some presumably presocial habits of Japanese Ceratina bees, with notes on various social types in Hymenoptera, Insectes soc., 1977, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 319–343.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Wille, A. and Orozco, E., The life cycle and behavior of the social bee Lasioglossum (Dialictus) umbripenne (Hymenoptera: Halictidae), Rev. Biol. Trop., 1970, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 199–245.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Alford, D.V., The incipient stages of development of bumblebee colonics, Insectes Sociaux, 1970, vol. 17, no. l, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Brian, A.D., Division of labour and foraging in Bombus agrorum Fabricius, J. Anim. Ecol., 1952, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 223–240.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Eskov, E.K., Ecology of Honeybee, Ryazan: Russkoe slovo, 1995, 392 p.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Taber S. Bee behavior. Amcr. Bce J. 1980, vol. 120, no. 4, pp. 264–266.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Eskov, E.K., Biology of Bees, Encyclopedic Reference Dictionary, Moscow: INFRA-M, 2013, 388 p.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Tsvetkov, I., Help to Apiculturers of Collective and State Farms, Ryazanskoe kn. izd-vo, 1962, 96 p.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Lin, N. and Michener, C.D., Evolution of sociality in insects, Quart. Rev. Biol., 1972, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 131–159.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Katayama, E., Observations on the brood development in Bombus ignitus (Hymenoptera, Apidae). II. Brood development and feeding habits, Kontyu, 1973, vol. 41, pp. 203–216.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Garofalo, C.A., Bionomics of Bombus (Fervidobombus) morio (Swederus). 2. Body size length of life of workers, J. Apicult. Res., 1978, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 130–136.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Perepelova, L., Polypores, larval elimination, queens, and swarming, Opytn. paseka, 1928, no. 5–6, pp. 214–217.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Velthuis, H.H.W., Clement, J., and Morse, R.A., The ovaries of Apis dorsata workers and queens form the Philippine, Apic. Res., 1971, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 63–66.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Gaidak, M.G., Life activity of honeybees, Pchela i ulei, Moscow: Kolos, 1969, pp. 80–148.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Maurizio, A., Feeding with pollen and life processes in honeybee, Novoe v pchelovodstve, Moscow, Gosselkhozizdat, 1958, pp. 372–444.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Roseler, P.F., Die Anzahl der Spermien im Receptaculum seminis von Hummelkoniginnen (Hym., Apoidea, Bombinae), Apidologie, 1973, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 267–274.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Onions. G.W., South African “Fertile-Worker Bees”, Agric. J. Univ. S. Afr., 1912, no. 3, pp. 720–728.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Ruttner, F., The problem of the cape bee (Apis mellifera capensis Excholtz): parthenogenesis-size of population-evolution, Apidologie, 1977, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 281–294.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Woyke, J., Cannibalism and brood-rearing efficiency in the honeybees, J. Apicult. Res., 1977, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 84–94.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Woyke, J., Evidence and action of cannibalism substance in Apis cerana indica, J. Apic. Res., 1980, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 6–16.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Kerr, W.E., Sex determination in bees. III. Caste determination and genetic control in Melipona, Insect. Sociaux, 1974, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 357–367.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Torchio, P.F. and Topedino, V.J., Sex ratio, body size and seasonality in a solitary bee, Osmia linaria propinqua Cresson (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae), Evolution (USA), 1980, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 993–1003.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Roger, D., Sur la biologie de Trigona (Apotrigona) nebulata komiensis Cock. Biol. Gabon, 1969, no. 5, pp. 151–187.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Knerer, G. and Schwarz, M., Halictine social evolution: the Australian enigma, Science, 1976, vol. 194, no. 4263, pp. 445–448.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Zucchi, R., Sakagami, S.F., and Camargo, J.M.F., Biological observations on a Neotropical parasocial bee, Eulkma nigrita with a review on the biology of Euglossinae (Hymenoptera: Apidae). A comparative study, J. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Univ., 1969, Ser. 6, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 271–380.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Darchen, R., and Darchen-Delage, B., Nouvells experiences concernant le determinisme des castes cher les Melipones (Hymenopteres Apides), C. r. Acad. Sci., 1974, vol. D 278, no. 7, pp. 907–910.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Imperalriz-Fonscca, V.L., Studies on Paratrigona subnuda (Moure) (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponinae). I. Members of the colony, Rev. brazil. Entomol., 1976, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 101–112.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Maszynska, J., Troche o trutniach, Pszczelarstwo, 1979, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 5–6Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Sacagarni, S.F., Ethological peculiarities of the primitive social bees, Allodape Lepeltier and allied genera, Insect. Sociaux, 1960, vol. 7, pp. 231–249.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Watmough, R.H., Biology and behaviour of carpenter bees in Southern Africa, J. Entomol. Soc. South. Afr., 1974, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 261–281.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Bonelli, B., Osservazioni eto-ecologiche sugli Imenotteri Aculeati dell`Ettopia. VII. Xylocopa (Mesotrichia) combusta Smith (Hymenoptera-Anthophridae), Boll. Ist. entomol. Univ. Studi Bologna, 1977, vol. 33, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Breed, M.D. and Gamboa, G.J., Control of worker activites by queen behavior in a primitively eusocial bees, Science, 1977, vol. 195, no. 4279, pp. 694–696.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Skirkiavichius, A.V., Pheromonic Communication of Insects, Vilnius, Mokslas, 1986, 292 p.Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Nixon, H.L. and Ribbands, C.R., Food transmission within the honeybee community, Proc. Roy. Soc. B., 1952, vol. 140, no. 898, p. 43.Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Duo, D., Roge, B., and Pegn, J., Comparison with aid of radioisotope exchange with feed between bees (Apis mellifera ligustica S.) of three casts, 25th Internat. Congr. Apiculture, Grenoble: Apimondia, 1975, pp. 295–297.Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Pegn, J., Roge, B., and Duo, P., Radioisotopes and seasonal variability of exchange with feed in bees, XXV Intern. Congr. Apiculture, Bucharest: Apimondia, 1975, p. 171.Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Ferguson, A.W. and Free, J.B., Queen pheromone transfer within honeybee colonies, Physiol. Entomol., 1980, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 359–366.Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Seeley, T., Queen substance dispersal by messenger workers in honeybee colonies, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 1979, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 391–415.Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Butler, C.J., World of Honeybee, Moscow, Kolos, 1980, 232 pp.Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Michener, C.D. and Brothers, D.J., Were workers of eusocial Hymenoptera initially altruistic or oppressed?, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 1974, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 671–674.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Woyke, J., Brood-rearing efficiency and absconding in Indian honeybecs, J. Apicult. Res., 1976, vol. 15, no. 3–4, pp. 133–143.Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Bell, W.J., Factors controlling initiation of vitallygenesis in a primitively social bee, Lasioglossum zephyrum (Hymenoptera: Halictidae), Insect. Sociaux, 1973, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 253–260.Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Richards, K.W., Ovarian development of queen and worker bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Southern Alberta, Can. Entomol., 1977, vol. 109, no. l, pp. 109–116.Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Roseler, P.-F. and Roseler, I., Studies on the regulation of the juvenile hormone titer in bumblebee workers, Bombus terrestris, J. Insect. Physiol., 1978, vol. 24, no. 10/11, pp. 707–713.Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    van Honk, C.G.J., Roseler, P.-F., Velhuis, H., and Malotaux, M.E., The mandibular glands of Bombus terrestris queens as a source of queen pheromones, Entomol. Exper. Applic., 1980, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 191–198.Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Roseler, P.-F., Roseler, I., and van Honk, C.G.J., Evidence for inhibition of corpora allata activity in workers of Bombus terrestris by a pheromone from the queen’s mandibular gIands, Experientia, 1981, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 348–351.Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Elbert, R., Honey bee foraging behavior: responses to queens, larvae, and extracts of larvae, Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer., 1970, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 1689–1694.Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Velthuis, H.H.W., Observations on the transmission of queen, Behavior, 1972, vol. 41, no. 1–2, pp. 105–129.Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Pain, J., Roger, B., Theurkauff, J., Mise en evidence d’un cycle saisonnier de la teneur en acides ceto-9 et hydroxy-9 decene-2 oique des fetes de reines vies d`abeilles, Apidologie, 1974, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 319–355.Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Leonardo, A.M.C., Developmental cycle of the mandibular glands of Apis mellifera workers. 2. Effects of queenlessness, J. Apicult. Res., 1985, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 76–79.Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Velthuis, H.H.W., Verheijen, F.J., and Cottenbos, A.J., Laying worker honey bee: similarities to the queen, Nature (Engl.), 1965, vol. 207, no. 5003, p. 1314.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Russian State Agrarian Correspondence UniversityBalashikha, Moscow oblastRussia

Personalised recommendations