Advertisement

JETP Letters

, Volume 108, Issue 9, pp 633–636 | Cite as

Excitation of Autoionization States and Electronic Stopping Powers at Collisions of Slow Ions with a Solid

  • A. N. ZinovievEmail author
  • P. Yu. Babenko
  • D. S. Meluzova
  • A. P. Shergin
Miscellaneous
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

It has been shown that the excitation of autoionization states at collisions of keV ions with a solid is decisive for inelastic energy loss and, correspondingly, the electronic stopping power dE/dx. It has been proposed to estimate the electronic stopping power dE/dx using the relation of cross sections for the excitation of autoionization states to ionization cross sections. When ionization cross sections are unknown, scaling is used to calculate ionization cross sections at the excitation of the L and M shells. A threshold dependence of the electronic stopping power dE/dx on the energy of bombarding ions has been predicted.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    C. C. Montanari and P. Dimitriou, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 408, 50 (2017).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Paul, AIP Conf. Proc. 1525, 295 (2013).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. F. Ziegler and J. P. Biersack, SRIM. http://www.srim.org.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    O. B. Firsov, Sov. Phys. JETP 36, 1517 (1959).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Yu. Babenko and A. P. Shergin, Tech. Phys. 54, 958 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    U. Fano and W. Lichten, Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 627 (1965).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. J. Bierman and W. C. Turkenburg, Physica 67, 533 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. N. Zinoviev, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 269, 829 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. V. Afrosimov, Yu. S. Gordeev, A. M. Polansky, and A. P. Shergin, Tech. Phys. 41, 134 (1972).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. C. Hayden and R. C. Amme, Phys. Rev. 141, 30 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. K. Cacak and T. Jorgensen, Phys. Rev. A 2, 1322 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. B. Gilbody, J. B. Hasted, and D. Phil, Proc. R. Soc., Ser. A 240, 382 (1957).ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. B. Gilbody, J. B. Hasted, J. V. Ireland, A. R. Lee, E. W. Thomas, and A. S. Whiteman, Proc. R. Soc., Ser. A 274, 40 (1963).ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    F. Xu, G. Manico, F. Ascione, A. Bonanno, A. Oliva, and R. A. Baragiola, Phys. Rev. A 57, 1096 (1998).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. O. Haugsjaa and R. C. Amme, J. Chem. Phys. 52, 4874 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. G. Meschi, PhD Thesis (Ioffe Inst., Leningrad, 1983).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    V. V. Afrosimov, ·Yu. S. Gordeev, A. M. Polyanskii, and A. P. Shergin, Sov. Phys. JETP 36, 418 (1973).ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    P. Yu. Babenko, A. N. Zinoviev, and A. P. Shergin, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 354, 142 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. Mace, M. J. Gordon, and K. P. Giapis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 257603 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    D. Schneider, G. Notle, U. Wille, and N. Stolterfoht, Phys. Rev. A 28, 161 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. Eichler, U. Wille, B. Fastrup, and K. Taulbjerg, Phys. Rev. A 14, 707 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    B. Fastrup, G. Hermann, and K. J. Smith, Phys. Rev. A 3, 1591 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    V. V. Afrosimov, Yu. S. Gordeev, and V. M. Lavrov, Sov. Phys. JETP 41, 860 (1975).ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. N. Zinoviev
    • 1
    Email author
  • P. Yu. Babenko
    • 1
  • D. S. Meluzova
    • 1
  • A. P. Shergin
    • 1
  1. 1.Ioffe Physical–Technical InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations