JETP Letters

, Volume 105, Issue 9, pp 553–560 | Cite as

First experimental observation of the conical effect in Smith–Purcell radiation

  • G. A. Naumenko
  • A. P. Potylitsyn
  • D. Yu. Sergeeva
  • A. A. Tishchenko
  • M. N. Strikhanov
  • V. V. Bleko
Fields, Particles, and Nuclei

Abstract

The conical effect in Smith–Purcell radiation arising from electrons moving at non-zero angle to the direction of grating periodicity has been observed for the first time. It was found that the maximum of radiation intensity for ψ ≠ 0 shifts in both polar and azimuth angles. The experimental and theoretical results were compared, and the good agreement was shown. The experiment has been performed for 6 MeV electrons and at millimeter wavelengths.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    L. Schachter and A. Ron, Phys. Rev. A 40, 876 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Andrews and C. F. Brau, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 7, 070701 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Gardelle, P. Modin, and J. T. Donohue, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 224801 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Urata, M. Goldstein, M. F. Kimmitt, A. Naumov, C. Platt, and J. E. Walsh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 516 (1998).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Li, Z. Yang, K. Imasaki, and G.-S. Park, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 9, 040701 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y. Li, Y. Sun, and K.-J. Kim, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 11, 080701 (2008).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. C. Nguyen, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 393, 514 (1997).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. E. Korbly, A. S. Kesar, R. J. Temkin, and J. H. Brownell, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 9, 022802 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    O. Haeberle, P. Rullhusen, J.-M. Salome, and N. Maene, Phys. Rev. E 55, 4675 (1997).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. G. Baryshevsky, K. G. Batrakov, A. A. Gurinovich, I. I. Ilienko, A. S. Lobko, V. I. Moroz, P. F. Sofronov, and V. I. Stolyarsky, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res.A 483, 21 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    V. G. Baryshevsky, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 445, 281 (2000).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. G. Baryshevsky, K. G. Batrakov, A. A. Gurinovich, I. I. Ilienko, A. S. Lobko, V. I. Moroz, P. F. Sofronov, and V. I. Stolyarsky, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 507, 137 (2003).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. Yu. Sergeeva, A. A. Tishchenko, and M. N. Strikhanov, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 18, 052801 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    N. Potylitsina-Kube and X. Artru, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 201, 172 (2003).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Yu. Sergeeva, A. A. Tishchenko, and M. N. Strikhanov, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 309, 189 (2013).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    D. Yu. Sergeeva, A. A. Tishchenko, and M. N. Strikhanov, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 355, 175 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. Yu. Sergeeva, A. P. Potylitsyn, A. A. Tishchenko, and M. N. Strikhanov, in Proceedings of the 37th International Free Electron Laser Conference (FEL 2015), Aug. 23–28, 2015, Daejeon, Korea, 2015, p. 752.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. I. Ryazanov, M. N. Strikhanov, and A. A. Tishchenko, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 99, 311 (2004).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. P. Potylitsyn, M. I. Ryazanov, M. N. Strikhanov, and A. A. Tishchenko, Diffraction Radiation from Relativistic Particles, Springer Tracts in Modern Physics, Vol. 239 (Springer, Berlin, 2011).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. Aryshev, B. Kalinin, G. Naumenko, A. Potylitsyn, R. Bardai, B. Ishkhanov, and V. Shvedunov, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 227, 175 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    B. N. Kalinin, D. V. Karlovets, A. S. Kostousov, G. A. Naumenko, A. P. Potylitsyn, G. A. Saruev, and L. G. Sukhikh, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 252, 62 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    D. V. Karlovets and A. P. Potylitsyn, JETP Lett. 84, 489 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    B. N. Kalinin, G. A. Naumenko, A. P. Potylitsyn, G. A. Saruev, L. G. Sukhikh, and V. A. Cha, JETP Lett. 84, 1103 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    S. E. Korbly, A. S. Kesar, J. R. Sirigiri, and R. J. Temkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 054803 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    A. S. Kesar, R. A. Marsh, and R. J. Temkin, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 9, 022801 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    A. A. Tishchenko, A. P. Potylitsyn, and M. N. Strikhanov, Phys. Rev. E 70, 066501 (2004).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yu. N. Adischev, A. V. Vukolov, D. V. Karlovets, G. Kube, and A. P. Potylitsyn, JETP Lett. 82, 174 (2005).ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. A. Naumenko
    • 1
  • A. P. Potylitsyn
    • 1
  • D. Yu. Sergeeva
    • 2
  • A. A. Tishchenko
    • 2
  • M. N. Strikhanov
    • 2
  • V. V. Bleko
    • 1
  1. 1.Tomsk Polytechnic UniversityTomskRussia
  2. 2.National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute)MoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations