JETP Letters

, Volume 104, Issue 7, pp 510–522 | Cite as

Adaptive quantum tomography

  • S. S. StraupeEmail author
Scientific Summaries


We provide a review of the experimental and theoretical research in the field of quantum tomography with an emphasis on recently developed adaptive protocols. Several statistical frameworks for adaptive experimental design are discussed. We argue in favor of the Bayesian approach, highlighting both its advantages for a statistical reconstruction of unknown quantum states and processes, and utility for adaptive experimental design. The discussion is supported by an analysis of several recent experimental implementations and numerical recipes.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    M.-D. Choi, Linear Algebra Appl. 10, 285 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Jamiolkowski, Rep. Math. Phys. 3, 275 (1972).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. F. James, P. G. Kwiat, W. J. Munro, and A. G. White, Phys. Rev. A 64, 052312 (2001).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Z. Hradil, Phys. Rev. A 55, R1561 (1997).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Blume-Kohout, New J. Phys. 12, 043034 (2010).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Blume-Kohout, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 200504 (2010).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yu. I. Bogdanov, A. K. Gavrichenko, K. S. Kravtsov, S. P. Kulik, E. V. Moreva, and A. A. Soloviev, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 113, 192 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Ferrie, New J. Phys. 16, 093035 (2014).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Christandl and R. Renner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 120403 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Blume-Kohout, arXiv:1202.5270 (2012).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. S. Kaznady and D. F. V. James, Phys. Rev. A 79, 022109 (2009).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    T. Opatrný, D.-G. Welsch, and W. Vogel, Phys. Rev. A 56, 1788 (1997).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. Qi, Zh. Hou, L. Li, D. Dong, G. Xiang, and G. Guo, Sci. Rep. 3, 3496 (2013).ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Giovannini, J. Romero, J. Leach, A. Dudley, A. Forbes, and M. J. Padgett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 143601 (2013).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    C. Granade, J. Combes, and D. G. Cory, New J. Phys. 18, 033024 (2016).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    U. von Toussaint, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 943 (2011).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Shang, H. K. Ng, A. Sehrawat, X. Li, and B.-G. Englert, New J. Phys. 15, 123026 (2013).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    C. Ferrie, New J. Phys. 16, 023006 (2014).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    D. Suess, U. Rudnicki, and D. Gross, arXiv:1608.00374 (2016).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    X. Li, J. Shang, H. K. Ng, and B.-G. Englert, arXiv:1602.05780 (2016).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. Doucet, N. de Freitas, and N. Gordon, Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice (Springer, Berlin, 2001).CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    F. E. Huszár, and N. M. T. Houlsby, Phys. Rev. A 85, 052120 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    C. Ferrie, New J. Phys. 16, 093035 (2014).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    C. Granade, C. Ferrie, and S. T. Flammia, arXiv:1605.05039 (2016).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    H. S. Kravtsov, S. S. Straupe, I. V. Radchenko, N. M. T. Houlsby, F. Huszár, and S. P. Kulik, Phys. Rev. A 87, 062122 (2013).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    G. I. Struchalin, I. A. Pogorelov, S. S. Straupe, K. S. Kravtsov, I. V. Radchenko, and S. P. Kulik, Phys. Rev. A 93, 012103 (2016).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    W. K. Hastings, Biometrika 57, 97 (1970).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    J. Liu and M. West, Combined Parameter and State Estimation in Simulation-Based Filtering (Springer, New York, 2001), p. 197.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    C. E. Granade, C. Ferrie, N. Wiebe, and D. G. Cory, New J. Phys. 14, 103013 (2012).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    J. Shang, Y.-L. Seah, H. K. Ng, J. Nott, and B.-G. Englert, New J. Phys. 17, 043017 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Y.-L. Seah, J. Shang, H. K. Ng, and D. J. Nott, and B.-G. Englert, New J. Phys. 17, 043018 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    I. Bengtsson and K. Zyczkovsky, Geometry of Quantum States (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. D 23, 357 (1981).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    C. A. Fuchs and C. M. Caves, Open Syst. Inform. Dyn. 3, 345 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    K. Zyczkowski, K. A. Penson, I. Nechita, and B. Collins, J. Math. Phys. 52, 062201 (2011).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    F. Mezzadri, Not. AMS 54, 592 (2007).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Y. S. Teo, J. Rehácek, and Z. Hradil, Quantum Meas. Quantum Metrol. 1, 57 (2013).ADSGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    J. Rehácek, B.-G. Englert, and D. Kaszlikowski, Phys. Rev. A 70, 052321 (2004).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    A. Ling, K. P. Soh, and A. Lamas-Linares, and C. Kurtsiefer, Phys. Rev. A 74, 022309 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    K. Jones, Ann. Phys. 207, 140 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    M. D. de Burgh, N. K. Langford, A. C. Doherty, and A. Gilchrist, Phys. Rev. A 78, 052122 (2008).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Yu. I. Bogdanov, G. Brida, M. Genovese, S. P. Kulik, E. V. Moreva, and A. P. Shurupov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 010404 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yu. I. Bogdanov, G. Brida, I. D. Bukeev, M. Genovese, K. S. Kravtsov, S. P. Kulik, E. V. Moreva, A. A. Soloviev, and A. P. Shurupov, Phys. Rev. A 84, 042108 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    J. M. Renes, R. Blume-Kohout, A. J. Scott, and C. M. Caves, J. Math. Phys. 45, 2171 (2004).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    E. Bagan, M. A. Ballester, R. D. Gill, R. Muñoz-Tapia, and O. Romero-Isart, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 130501 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    D. H. Mahler, L. A. Rozema, A. Darabi, C. Ferrie, R. Blume-Kohout, and A. M. Steinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 183601 (2013).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    M. J. W. Hall, Phys. Lett. A 242, 123 (1998).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    E. Bagan, M. Baig, R. Muñoz-Tapia, and A. Rodriguez, Phys. Rev. A 69, 010304 (2004).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    S. Massar and S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1259 (1995).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    G. Vidal, J. I. Latorre, P. Pascual, and R. Tarrach, Phys. Rev. A 60, 126 (1999).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    R. D. Gill and S. Massar, Phys. Rev. A 61, 042312 (2000).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Z. Hou, H. Zhu, G.-Y. Xiang, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Quantum Inform. 2, 16001 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    D. G. Fischer, S. H. Kienle, and M. Freyberger, Phys. Rev. A 61, 032306 (2000).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    A. Kalev and I. Hen, New J. Phys. 17, 093008 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    H. Nagaoka, in Asymptotic Theory of Quantum Statistical Inference, Ed. by M. Hayashi (World Scientific, Singapore, 2005).Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    A. Fujiwara, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39, 12489, (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    T. Sugiyama, P. S. Turner, and M. Murao, Phys. Rev. A 85, 052107 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Th. Hannemann, D. Reiss, Ch. Balzer, W. Neuhauser, P. E. Toschek, and Ch. Wunderlich, Phys. Rev. A 65, 050303 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    R. Okamoto, M. Iefuji, S. Oyama, K. Yamagata, H. Imai, A. Fujiwara, and S. Takeuchi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 130404 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    S. Lerch and A. Stefanov, Opt. Lett. 39, 5399 (2014).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    J. T. Barreiro, N. K. Langford, N. A. Peters, and P. G. Kwiat, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 260501 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    N. Bent, H. Qassim, A. A. Tahir, D. Sych, G. Leuchs, L. L. Sánchez-Soto, E. Karimi, and R. W. Boyd, Phys. Rev. X 5, 041006 (2015).Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    B. Qi, Zh. Hou, Y. Wang, D. Dong, H.-S. Zhong, L. Li, G.-Y. Xiang, H. M. Wiseman, Ch.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, arXiv:1512.01634 (2015).Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    C. Ferrie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 190404 (2014).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    R. J. Chapman, C. Ferrie, and A. Peruzzo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 040402 (2016).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    X.-C. Yao, T.-X. Wang, P. Xu, H. Lu, G.-Sh. Pan, X.-H. Bao, Ch.-Zh. Peng, Ch.-Y. Lu, Y.-A. Chen, and J.-W. Pan, Nat. Photon. 6, 225 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    X.-L. Wang, L.-K. Chen, W. Li, et al. (Collab.), arXiv:1605.08547 (2016).Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    D. Gross, Y.-K. Liu, S. T. Flammia, S. Becker, and J. Eisert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 150401 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    M. Cramer, M. B. Plenio, S. T. Flammia, R. Somma, D. Gross, S. D. Bartlett, O. Landon-Cardinal, D. Poulin, and L. Yi-Kai, Nature Commun. 1, 149 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    S. T. Flammia, D. Gross, Y.-K. Liu, and J. Eisert, New J. Phys. 14, 095022 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    J. Rehácek, D. Mogilevtsev, and Z. Hradil, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 010402 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    D. Mogilevtsev, A. Ignatenko, A. Maloshtan, B. Stoklasa, J. Rehácek, and Z. Hradil, New J. Phys. 15, 025038 (2013).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    M. Cooper, M. Karpinski, and B. J. Smith, Nat. Commun. 5, 4332 (2014).ADSGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    G. Harder, C. Silberhorn, J. Rehácek, Z. Hradil, L. Motka, B. Stoklasa, and L. L. Sánchez-Soto, Phys. Rev. A 90, 042105 (2014).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    A. Mikhalychev, D. Mogilevtsev, Y. S. Teo, J. Rehácek, and Z. Hradil, Phys. Rev. A 92, 052106 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    C. E. Granade, C. Ferrie, N. Wiebe, and D. G. Cory, New J. Phys. 14, 103013 (2012).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    M. P. V. Stenberg, Y. R. Sanders, and F. K. Wilhelm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 210404 (2014).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    M. P. V. Stenberg, O. Köhn, and F. K. Wilhelm, Phys. Rev. A 93, 012122 (2016).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    B. L. Higgins, D. W. Berry, S. D. Bartlett, H. M. Wiseman, and G. J. Pryde, Nature 450, 393 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    L. Pezzé, A. Smerzi, G. Khoury, J. F. Hodelin, and D. Bouwmeester, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 223602 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    A. Hentschel and B. C. Sanders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 063603 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    M. P. Stenberg, K. Pack, and F. K. Wilhelm, arXiv:1508.04412.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of PhysicsMoscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations