Advertisement

JETP Letters

, Volume 103, Issue 2, pp 131–136 | Cite as

Update of the MCSANC Monte Carlo integrator, v. 1.20

  • A. Arbuzov
  • D. BardinEmail author
  • S. Bondarenko
  • P. Christova
  • L. Kalinovskaya
  • U. Klein
  • V. Kolesnikov
  • L. Rumyantsev
  • R. Sadykov
  • A. Sapronov
Methods of Theoretical Physics

Abstract

New features of the MCSANC v.1.20 program, a Monte Carlo tool for calculation of the next-to-leading order electroweak and QCD corrections to various Standard Model processes, have been presented. The extensions concern implementation of Drell–Yan-like processes and include a systematic treatment of the photon-induced contribution in proton–proton collisions and electroweak corrections beyond the NLO approximation. There are also technical improvements such as calculation of the forward–backward asymmetry for the neutral current Drell–Yan process. The updated code is suitable for studies of the effects due to EW and QCD radiative corrections to Drell–Yan (and several other) processes at the LHC and for forthcoming high-energy proton–proton colliders.

Keywords

Electroweak Correction Scalar Form Factor Monte Carlo Tool High Order Radiative Correction Lower Order Cross Section 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collab.), Phys. Lett. B 725, 223 (2013).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Brensing, S. Dittmaier, M. Kramer, and A. Muck, Phys. Rev. D 77, 073006 (2008).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Arbuzov and R. Sadykov, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 106, 488 (2008).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Bardin, S. Bondarenko, P. Christova, L. Kalinovskaya, and L. Rumyantsev, JETP Lett. 96, 285 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. G. Bondarenko and A. A. Sapronov, Comp. Phys. Commun. 184, 234 (2013).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Andonov, A. Arbuzov, D. Bardin, S. Bondarenko, and P. Christova, Comp. Phys. Comm. 181, 305 (2010); arXiv:0812.4207.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Dittmaier and M. Huber, J. High Energy Phys. 1001, 060 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Fleischer, O. Tarasov, and F. Jegerlehner, Phys. Lett. B 319, 249 (1993).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Fleischer, O. Tarasov, and F. Jegerlehner, Phys. Rev. D 51, 3820 (1995).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Y. Bardin, W. Hollik, and G. Passarino, Reports of the Working Group CERN 95-03 (CERN, Geneva, 1995).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Barbieri, M. Beccaria, P. Ciafaloni, G. Curci, and A. Vicere, Phys. Lett. B 288, 95 (1992); hepph/ 9205238.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Djouadi and C. Verzegnassi, Phys. Lett. B 195, 265 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Djouadi, Nuovo Cim. A 100, 357 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Consoli, W. Hollik, and F. Jegerlehner, Phys. Lett. B 227, 167 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Consoli, W. Hollik, and F. Jegerlehner, Electroweak Radiative Corrections for Z Physics, CERN-TH-5527- 89 (CERN, Geneva, 1989).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Andonov, A. Arbuzov, D. Bardin, S. Bondarenko, P. Christova, L. Kalinovskaya, G. Nanava, and W. von Schlippe, Comp. Phys. Commun. 174, 481 (2006); hep-ph/0411186.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    C. Buttar, J. D’Hondt, M. Kramer, G. Salam, M. Wobisch, et al., arXiv:0803.0678.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Arbuzov
    • 1
  • D. Bardin
    • 2
    Email author
  • S. Bondarenko
    • 1
  • P. Christova
    • 2
  • L. Kalinovskaya
    • 2
  • U. Klein
    • 4
  • V. Kolesnikov
    • 2
  • L. Rumyantsev
    • 2
    • 3
  • R. Sadykov
    • 2
  • A. Sapronov
    • 2
  1. 1.Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical PhysicsJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchDubna, Moscow regionRussia
  2. 2.Dzhelepov Laboratory for Nuclear ProblemsJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchDubna, Moscow regionRussia
  3. 3.Institute of PhysicsSouthern Federal UniversityRostov-on-DonRussia
  4. 4.University of LiverpoolLiverpoolUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations