Advertisement

Geotectonics

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 225–235 | Cite as

The cretaceous dynamics of the pacific plate and stages of magmatic activity in Northeastern Asia

  • A. A. Stepashko
Article

Abstract

The dynamics of the Pacific Plate is recorded in the systematic variation of location and the 40Ar-39Ar age of seamounts in the western Pacific from 120 to 65 Ma ago. The seamounts are grouped into three linear zones as long as 5000 km. The seamounts become younger in the southeastern direction along the strike of these zones. Correlation between age and location of seamounts allows division of the history of their formation into three stages. The rate of seamount growth was relatively low (2–4 cm/yr) during the first and the third stages within the intervals of 120–90 and 85–65 Ma, whereas during the second stage (90–85 Ma), the seamounts were growing very fast (80–100 cm/yr). In the midst of this stage, at ∼87 Ma ago, the magmatic activity increased abruptly. The dynamics of seamount building is in good agreement with (1) pulses in the development of the Ontong Java, Manihiki, and Caribbean-Colombian oceanic plateaus; (2) the age of spreading acceleration in the mid-Cretaceous; and (3) the short period when the Izanagi Plate ceased to exist and the Kula Plate was formed. The variation of the seamounts’ age and location is in consistence with the hypothesis of diffuse extension of the Pacific Plate in the course of its motion with formation of impaired zones of decompression melting. The direction of extension (325°–340° NW) calculated from the strike of seamount zones is consistent with the path of the Pacific Plate (330° NW) in the Late Cretaceous. The immense perioceanic volcanic belts were formed at that time along the margin of the Asian continent. The Okhotsk-Chukchi Peninsula Belt extends at a right angle to the compression vector. Three stages of this belt’s evolution are synchronous with the stages of seamount formation in the Pacific Plate. The delay in the origination of the East Sikhote-Alin Volcanic Belt and its different orientation were caused by counterclockwise rotation of the vector of convergence of oceanic and continental plates in the mid-Cretaceous. At the same time, i.e., 95–85 Ma ago, the volcanic activity embraced the entire continental margin and the tin granites were emplaced everywhere in eastern Asia. This short episode (90 ± 5 Ma) corresponds to the mid-Cretaceous maximum of compression of the continental margin, and its age fits a culmination in extension of the Pacific Plate well.

Keywords

Cretaceous Late Cretaceous Continental Margin Magmatic Activity Volcanic Belt 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    V. F. Belyi, “Volcanism and Tectonic Evolution of the Continental Margins of the Pacific Ocean,” Tikhookean. Geol. 4(5), 23–32 (1985).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. F. Belyi, Geology of the Okhotsk-Chukchi Peninsula Volcanic Belt (Northeast Complex Res. Inst., Far East Division, Russian Acad. Sci., Magadan, 1994) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Volcanic Belts of Eastern Asia, Ed. by A. D. Shcheglov (Nauka, Moscow, 1984) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    I. A. Zagruzina, “The Evolution of Mesozoic Magmatism in the Pacific Framework in the Light of Radiological Data,” Geol. Geofiz. 21(4), 10–18 (1980).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. P. Zonenshain, M. V. Kononov, and L. A. Savostin, “Movements of Pacific Oceanic Plates Relative to Eurasia over the Last 130 My and Their Relationship with Orogenic Events in Northeastern Asia,” in Proceedings of 27th Session of Intern. Geol. Congress (Nauka, Moscow, 1984), Vol. 9, p. 55 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. P. Zonenshain, L. A. Savostin, and A. P. Sedov, “Global Paleogeodynamic Reconstructions for the Last 160 My,” Geotektonika 19(3), 3–16 (1984).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. P. Zonenshain, V. V. Matveenkov, B. V. Baranov, and V. V. Khain, “Movements of Cretaceous Seamounts in the Western Pacific Ocean over the Last 110 Ma,” Okeanologiya 27(4), 592–597 (1987).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. P. Zonenshain, M. I. Kuz’min, and L. M. Natapov, Plate Tectonics of the USSR Territory (Nedra, Moscow, 1990), Vol. 2 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. V. Kononov, Plate Tectonics of the Northwestern Pacific Ocean (Nauka, Moscow, 1989) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    I. N. Kotlyar, V. F. Belyi, and A. P. Milov, Petrochemistry of Igneous Associations in the Okhotsk-Chukchi Peninsula Volcanic Belt (Nauka, Moscow, 1981) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    I. N. Kotlyar, I. L. Zhulanova, T. B. Rusakova, and A. M. Gagieva, Isotopic Systems of Igneous and Metamorphic Complexes of Northeastern Russia (Northeast Complex Res. Inst., Far East Division, Russian Acad. Sci., Magadan, 2001) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    O. K. Leont’ev, S. A. Luk’yanova, and V. S. Medvedev, “Experience in Applying Morphology of Coral Reefs and Guyots to Study of Vertical Crustal Movements,” in Global Sea-Level Variations and Marine Geomorphology (Nauka, Moscow, 1975), pp. 72–76 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. V. Matveenkov and N. A. Marova, “Age of Igneous Complexes and Associated Structures of the Marcus-Necker Rise,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Geol., No. 5, 78–89 (1975).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. W. Menard, Marine Geology of the Pacific (McGraw-Hills, New York, 1964; Mir, Moscow, 1966).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. F. Mishin, Zhao Chuntsing, and A. I. Soldatov “Mesozoic-Cenozoic Volcanic-Plutonic Belts and Systems in the Continental Part of East Asia and Their Zoning,” Tikhookean. Geol. 22(3), 28–47 (2003).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    L. M. Parfenov, B. A. Natal’in, and I. P. Voinova, “Tectonic Evolution of Active Continental Margins in Northwestern Pacific Framework,” Geotektonika 16(1), 85–104 (1981).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    L. M. Parfenov, Continental Margins and Mesozoic Island Arcs in Northeastern Asia (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1984) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. M. Rodionov, “Petrochemical Evolution of Tin-Bearing Ore-Magmatic Systems,” in Proceedings of III Kosygin Conference on Tectonics, Deep Structure, and Geodynamics of Eastern Asia, Khabarovsk, Russia, 2001, Ed. by N. P. Romanovsky (Inst. Tectonics Geophysics, Far East Division, Russian Acad. Sci., Khabarovsk, 2001), pp. 225–239 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    V. I. Sinyukov, Rock Associations and Structure of the Sikhote-Alin Volcanic Belt (Nauka, Moscow, 1986) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. P. Stavsky, V. D. Chekhovich, M. V. Kononov, and L. P. Zonenshain, “Plate Tectonics and Palinspastic Reconstructions of the Anadyr-Koryak Region,” Geotektonika 23(6), 32–42 (1988).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pacific Margin of Asia. Magmatism (Nauka, Moscow, 1991) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    N. I. Filatova, Perioceanic Volcanic Belts (Nedra, Moscow, 1988) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    V. E. Khain, Tectonics of Continents and Oceans (2000) (Nauchnyi Mir, Moscow, 2001) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    D. I. Anderson, T. Tanimoto, and Y.-S. Zhang, “Plate Tectonics and Hotspots: the Third Dimension,” Science 256, 1645–1651 (1992).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    W. A. Berggren, D. V. Kent, J. J. Flynn, and J. A. Van Couvering, “Cenozoic Geochronology,” Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 96, 1407–1418 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    D. W. Caress, H. W. Menard, and R. N. Hey, “Eocene Reorganization of the Pacific-Farallon Spreading Center North of the Mendocino Fracture Zone,” J. Geophys. Res. 93(B4), 2813–2838 (1988).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    D. C. Engebretson, A. Cox, and R. G. Gordon, “Relative Motions between Oceanic Plates in the Pacific Basin,” J. Geophys. Res. 89(B12), 10291–10310 (1984).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    D. C. Engebretson, A. Cox, and R. G. Gordon, “Relative Motions between Oceanic and Continental Plates in the Pacific Basin,” Geol. Soc. Amer. Spec. Paper 206, 1–59 (1985).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    E. L. Hamilton, Sunken Islands of the Mid-Pacific Mountains (Mem. Geol. Soc. Am., 1956).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    H. H. Hess, “Drowned Ancient Islands of the Pacific Basin,” Am. J. Sci. 224, 772–792 (1946).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    T. W. C. Hilde, S. Uyeda, and L. Kroenke, “Evolution of the Western Pacific and Its Margin,” Tectonophysics 38(1), 45–165 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    G. Ito and P. D. Clift, “Subsidence and Growth of Pacific Cretaceous Plateaus,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 161, 85–100 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    R. D. Jarrard and D. A. Clague, “Implications of Pacific Island and Seamount Ages for the Origin of Volcanic Chains,” Rev. Geophys. 15(1), 57–76 (1977).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    A. C. Kerr, J. Tarney, A. Nivia, et al., “The Internal Structure of Oceanic Plateaus: Inferences from Obducted Cretaceous Terranes in Western Colombia and the Caribbean,” Tectonophysics 292, 173–188 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    A. C. Kerr, R. V. White, and A. D. Saunders, “LIP Reading: Recognizing Oceanic Plateaux in the Geological Record,” J. Petrol. 41(7), 1041–1056 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    R. L. Larson, “Latest Pulse of the Earth: Evidence for a Mid-Cretaceous Superplume,” Geology 19, 547–550 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    R. L. Larson and C. G. Chase, “Late Mesozoic Evolution of the Western Pacific Ocean,” Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 83, 3627–3644 (1972).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    R. L. Larson and W. C. Pitman, “World-Wide Correlation of Mesozoic Magnetic Anomalies and Its Implications,” Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 83, 3645–3662 (1972).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    C. Lithgow-Bertelloni and M. A. Richards, “The Dynamics of Cenozoic and Mesozoic Plate Motions,” Rev. Geophys. 36(1), 27–78 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    P. Lonsdale, “Geography and History of the Louisville Hotspot Chain in the Southwest Pacific,” J. Geophys. Res. 93(B4), 3078–3104 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    B. V. Malkin and A. I. Shemenda, “Mechanism of Rifting: Considerations Based on Results of Physical Modeling and on Geological and Geophysical Data,” Tectonophysics 199, 193–200 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    J. Mammerickx and G. F. Sharman, “Tectonic Evolution of the North Pacific during the Cretaceous Quiet Period,” J. Geophys. Res. 93(B4), 3009–3024 (1988).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    S. Maruyama and T. Seno, “Orogeny and Relative Plate Motions: Example of the Japanese Islands,” Tectonophysics 127, 305–329 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    W. J. Morgan, “Plate Motions and Deep Mantle Convection,” Geol. Soc. Am. Mem. 132, 7–22 (1972).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    D. K. Rea and R. A. Duncan, “North Pacific Plate Convergence: A Quantitative Record of the Past 140 M.Y.,” Geology 14, 373–376 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    W. W. Sager and A. A. P. Koppers, “Late Cretaceous Polar Wander of the Pacific Plate: Evidence of a Rapid True Polar Wander Events,” Science 287, 455–459 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    D. T. Sandwell, E. L. Winterer, and J. Mammerickx, “Evidence for Diffuse Extension of the Pacific Plate from Pukapuka Ridges and Cross-Grain Gravity Lineations,” J. Geophys. Res. 100(B8), 15087–15099 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    M. L. G. Tejada, J. J. Mahoney, R. A. Duncan, and M. P. Hawkins, “Age and Geochemistry of Basement and Alkalic Rocks of Malaita and Santa Isabel, Solomon Islands, Southern Margin of Ontong Java Plateau,” J. Petrol. 37, 361–394 (1996).Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    J. Thiede, W. E. Dean, et al., “The Geologic History of the Mid-Pacific Mountains in the Central North Pacific Ocean—a Synthesis of Deep-Sea Drilling Studies,” in DSDP Initial Reports (Govern. Print. Office, Washington, DC, 1981), Vol. 62, pp. 1073–1120.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    D. L. Turcotte and E. R. Oxburgh, “Intra-Plate Volcanism,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London 288A(1355), 561–579 (1978).Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    P. Wessel and L. W. Kroenke, “The Geometric Relationship between Hot Spots and Seamounts: Implications for Pacific Hot Spots,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 158, 1–18 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    J. T. Wilson, “A Possible Origin of the Hawaiian Islands,” Can. J. Phys. 41, 863–870 (1963).Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    M. T. Woods and G. F. Davies, “Late Cretaceous Genesis of the Kula Plate,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 58(2), 161–166 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. Stepashko
    • 1
  1. 1.Kosygin Institute of Tectonics and Geophysics, Far East DivisionRussian Academy of SciencesKhabarovskRussia

Personalised recommendations