Advertisement

Geomagnetism and Aeronomy

, Volume 55, Issue 6, pp 763–769 | Cite as

Influence of GPS/GLONASS differential code biases on the determination accuracy of the absolute total electron content in the ionosphere

  • Yu. V. YasyukevichEmail author
  • A. A. Mylnikova
  • V. E. Kunitsyn
  • A. M. Padokhin
Article

Abstract

Systematic error arises when the total electron content (TEC) is estimated with the simultaneous use of phase and code GPS/GLONASS measurements. This is related to the different signal propagation times at L1 and L2 frequencies in the radio frequency path of the transmitting and receiving equipment, the so-called differential code biases. A differential code bias of 1 ns results in an error of ~2.9 TECU when TEC is determined. Differential code bias variations on a long time interval, which were obtained at the CODE laboratory, were analyzed. It has been found that the systematic variation in these biases and considerable seasonal variations apparently caused by the environmental state (temperature and humidity), which sometimes reach 20 TECU (in TEC units), are observed for several stations. The algorithm for determining differential code biases at an individual station and the results of correction for absolute slant TEC are also presented. Presented results show algorithm effectiveness for various geographical regions and solar activity.

Keywords

Global Navigation Satellite System Global Navigation Satellite System Total Electron Content Vertical Total Electron Content Differential Code Bias 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Afraimovich, E.L. and Yasukevich, Yu.V., Using GPSGLONASS-GALILEO data and IRI modeling for ionospheric calibration of radio telescopes and radio interferometers, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 2008, vol. 70, no. 15, pp. 1949–1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Afraimovich, E.L., Astafyeva, E.I., Demyanov, V.V., et al., Review of GPS/GLONASS studies of the ionospheric response to natural and anthropogenic processes and phenomena, J. Space Weather Space Clim., 2013, vol. 3, no. A27. doi 10.1051/swsc/2013049Google Scholar
  3. Afraimovich, E.L. and Perevalova, N.P., GPS-monitoring verkhnei atmosfery Zemli (GPS-Monitoring of the Earth’s Upper Atmosphere), Irkutsk: GU NTs RVKh VSNTs SO RAMN, 2006.Google Scholar
  4. Blewitt, G., An automatic editing algorithm for GPS data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 1990, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 199–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dow, J.M., Neilan, R.E., and Rizos, C., The international GNSS service in a changing landscape of global navigation satellite systems, J. Geodesy, 2009, vol. 83, nos. 3–4, pp. 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Forte, B. and Aquino, M., On the estimate and assessment of the ionospheric effects affecting low frequency radio astronomy measurements, 30th URSI General Assembly and Scientific Symposium, 2011, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
  7. Hernandez-Pajares, M., Juan, J.M., and Sanz, J., New approaches in global ionospheric determination using ground GPS data, J. Atmos. Sol.–Terr. Phys., 1999, vol. 61, no. 16, pp. 1237–1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hernandez-Pajares, M., Juan, J.M., Sanz, J., Garcia-Rigo, A., Feltens, J., Komjathy, A., Schaer, S.C., and Krankowski, A., the IGS VTEC maps: A reliable source of ionospheric information since 1998, J. Geodesy, 2009, vol. 83, nos. 3–4, pp. 263–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., Lichtenegger, H., and Collins, J., Global Positioning System: Theory and Practice, Wien: Springer, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jakowski, N., Mayer, C., Hoque, M.M., and Wilken, V., Total electron content models and their use in ionosphere monitoring, Radio Sci., 2011, vol. 46, no. 6. RS0D18. doi 10.1029/2010RS004620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jin, R., Jin, S., and Feng, G., M_DCB: Matlab code for estimating GNSS satellite and receiver differential code biases, GPS Solutions, 2012, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 541–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Komjathy, A., Sparks, L., Wilson, B.D., and Mannucci, A.J., Automated daily processing of more than 1000 groundbased GPS receivers for studying intense ionospheric storms, Radio Sci., 2005, vol. 40, no. 6, RS6006. doi 10.1029/2005RS003279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li, Z., Yuan, Y., Li, H., Ou, J., and Hou, X., Two-step method for the determination of the differential code biases of compass satellites, J. Geodesy, 2012, vol. 86, no. 11, pp. 1059–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mannucci, A.J., Wilson, B.D., Yuan, D.N., Ho, C.H., Lindqwister, U.J., and Runge, T.F., A global mapping technique for GPS-derived ionospheric TEC measurements, Radio Sci., 1998, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 565–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mayer, C., Becker, C., Jakowski, N., and Meurer, M., Ionosphere monitoring and inter-frequency bias determination using Galileo: First results and future prospects, Adv. Space Res., 2011, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 859–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mylnikova, A.A., Yasyukevich, Yu.V., Kunitsyn, V.E., and Padokhin, A.M., Variability of GPS/GLONASS differential code biases, Results Phys., 2015, vol. 5, pp. 9–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nesterov, I.A. and Kunitsyn, V.E., GNSS radio tomography of the ionosphere: The problem with essentially incomplete data, Adv. Space Res., 2011, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 1789–1803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ovodenko, V.B., Trekin, V.V., Korenkova, N.A., and Klimenko, M.V., Investigating range error compensation in UHF radar through IRI-2007 real-time updating: Preliminary results, Adv. Space Res., 2015. doi 10.1016/ jasr.2015.05.017Google Scholar
  19. Schaer, S., Overview of GNSS biases, International GNSS Service Workshop on GNSS Biases, 2012. http://www. biasws2012unibech/pdf/bws12_1.3.1pdfGoogle Scholar
  20. Schaer, S., Beutler, G., and Rothacher, M., Mapping and predicting the ionosphere, Proc. IGS AC Workshop, Darmstadt, Germany, February 9–11, 1998, 1998, pp. 307–320.Google Scholar
  21. Themens, D.R., Jayachandran, P.T., and Langley, R.B., Macdougall, J.W., and Nicolls, M.J., Determining receiver biases in GPS-derived total electron content in the auroral oval and polar cap region using ionosonde measurements, GPS Solutions, 2013, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 357–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu. V. Yasyukevich
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. A. Mylnikova
    • 1
  • V. E. Kunitsyn
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. M. Padokhin
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Solar–Terrestrial Physics, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of Sciences (ISTP SB RAS)IrkutskRussia
  2. 2.Physical FacultyMoscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations