Geomagnetism and Aeronomy

, Volume 54, Issue 6, pp 813–818 | Cite as

Frequency characteristic of response of surface air pressure to changes in flux of cosmic rays

  • M. B. BogdanovEmail author


We compare the series of daily-average values of the surface air pressure for De Bilt and Lugano meteorological stations with subtracted linear trends and seasonal harmonics, as well as the series of the flux of galactic cosmic rays (GCRs) at Jungfraujoch station with subtracted moving average over 200 days. Using the method of superposed epochs, we show that the Forbush decreases at both stations are accompanied by increased pressure. Spectral analysis allows us to conclude that the analyzed series are characterized by nonzero coherence in almost the entire frequency range: from 0.02 day−1 day up to the Nyquist frequency of 0.5 day−1. Using changes in the GCR flux as a probing signal, we obtain amplitude-frequency characteristics of the pressure reaction. For both stations, these characteristics are in qualitative agreement with each other and indicate that the atmospheric response can be described by a second-order linear dynamic system that has wide resonance with a maximum at a frequency of 0.15 day−1.


Solar Activity Frequency Characteristic Coherence Function Atmospheric Response Linear Dynamic System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Almeida, J., Schobesberger, S., Kürten, A., et al., Molecular understanding of sulphuric acid-amine particle nucleation in the atmosphere, Nature, 2013, vol. 502, no. 7471, pp. 359–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avdyushin, S.I. and Danilov, A.D., The Sun, weather, and climate: A present-day view of the problem (review), Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2000, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 545–555.Google Scholar
  3. Bendat, J.S. and Piersol, A.G., Measurement and Analysis of Random Data, New York: Wiley, 1971.Google Scholar
  4. Bogdanov, M.B. and Fedorenko, A.V., Effect of cosmic rays on atmospheric pressure under mountain conditions, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2006, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 254–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bogdanov, M.B., Surkov, A.N., and Fedorenko, A.V., Effect of cosmic rays on the near-earth pressure, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2004, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 93–95.Google Scholar
  6. Gray, L.J., Beer, J., Geller, M., et al., Solar influences on climate, Rev. Geophys., 2010, vol. 48, no. 4, p. RG4001. doi 10.1029/2009RG000282.2010.Google Scholar
  7. Grigor’ev V.G., Bezrodnykh I.P., Morozova E.I., Timofeev V.E., Skryabin N.G., Response of variations in the near-earth pressure to cosmic rays, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2002, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 520–522.Google Scholar
  8. Jenkins, G.M. and Watts, D.G., Spectral Analysis and Its Applications, San Francisco: Holden-Day, 1969.Google Scholar
  9. Key, S.M. and Marple, S.L., Spectrum analysis—a modern perspective, Proc. IEEE, vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 1380–1419.Google Scholar
  10. Kondratyev, K.Ya. and Nikolsky, G.A., Solar activity and climate. 1. Observational data. Condensation and ozone hypotheses, Issled. Zemli Kosmosa, 1995, no. 5, pp. 3–17.Google Scholar
  11. Laken, B.A. and Čalogovič, J., Composite analysis with Monte Carlo methods: An example with cosmic rays and clouds, J. Space Wea. Space Clim., 2013, vol. 3, p. A29. doi 10.1051/swsc/2013051.2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Morozova, A.L. and Pudovkin, M.I., Variations in atmospheric pressure during solar proton events and Forbush-decreases in GCR for different climatic zones, Proc. of the Int. Conf. “The Sun in the Age of Magnetic Field Sign Change”, St. Petersburg: GAO RAN, 2001, pp. 297–304.Google Scholar
  13. Ogurtsov, M.G., Raspopov, O.M., Oinonen, M., Jungner, H., and Lindholm, M., Possible manifestation of nonlinear effects when solar activity affects climate changes, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2010, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pudovkin, M.I. and Raspopov, O.M., A mechanism of the solar activity effect on the lower atmosphere state and meteorological parameters, Geomagn. Aeron., 1992, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
  15. Raspopov, O.M. and Veretenenko, S.V., Solar activity and cosmic rays: Influence on cloudiness and processes in the lower atmosphere (in memory and on the 75th anniversary of M.I. Pudovkin), Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2009, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Timofeev, V.E., Grigor’ev, V.G., Morozova, E.I., Skryabin, N.G., and Samsonov, S.N., Effect of cosmic rays on the latent energy of the atmosphere, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2003, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 636–640.Google Scholar
  17. Tinsley B.A., Brown G.M., and Scherrer P.H., Solar variability influences on weather and climate: Possible connections through cosmic ray fluxes and storm intensification, J. Geophys. Res., 1989, vol. 94, no. D12, pp. 14783–14792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Usoskin, I.G., Cosmic rays and climate forcing, Mem. Soc. Astron. Ital., 2011, vol. 82, pp. 937–942.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Saratov State UniversitySaratovRussia

Personalised recommendations