Frequency characteristic of response of surface air pressure to changes in flux of cosmic rays
We compare the series of daily-average values of the surface air pressure for De Bilt and Lugano meteorological stations with subtracted linear trends and seasonal harmonics, as well as the series of the flux of galactic cosmic rays (GCRs) at Jungfraujoch station with subtracted moving average over 200 days. Using the method of superposed epochs, we show that the Forbush decreases at both stations are accompanied by increased pressure. Spectral analysis allows us to conclude that the analyzed series are characterized by nonzero coherence in almost the entire frequency range: from 0.02 day−1 day up to the Nyquist frequency of 0.5 day−1. Using changes in the GCR flux as a probing signal, we obtain amplitude-frequency characteristics of the pressure reaction. For both stations, these characteristics are in qualitative agreement with each other and indicate that the atmospheric response can be described by a second-order linear dynamic system that has wide resonance with a maximum at a frequency of 0.15 day−1.
KeywordsSolar Activity Frequency Characteristic Coherence Function Atmospheric Response Linear Dynamic System
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Avdyushin, S.I. and Danilov, A.D., The Sun, weather, and climate: A present-day view of the problem (review), Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2000, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 545–555.Google Scholar
- Bendat, J.S. and Piersol, A.G., Measurement and Analysis of Random Data, New York: Wiley, 1971.Google Scholar
- Bogdanov, M.B., Surkov, A.N., and Fedorenko, A.V., Effect of cosmic rays on the near-earth pressure, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2004, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 93–95.Google Scholar
- Gray, L.J., Beer, J., Geller, M., et al., Solar influences on climate, Rev. Geophys., 2010, vol. 48, no. 4, p. RG4001. doi 10.1029/2009RG000282.2010.Google Scholar
- Grigor’ev V.G., Bezrodnykh I.P., Morozova E.I., Timofeev V.E., Skryabin N.G., Response of variations in the near-earth pressure to cosmic rays, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2002, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 520–522.Google Scholar
- Jenkins, G.M. and Watts, D.G., Spectral Analysis and Its Applications, San Francisco: Holden-Day, 1969.Google Scholar
- Key, S.M. and Marple, S.L., Spectrum analysis—a modern perspective, Proc. IEEE, vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 1380–1419.Google Scholar
- Kondratyev, K.Ya. and Nikolsky, G.A., Solar activity and climate. 1. Observational data. Condensation and ozone hypotheses, Issled. Zemli Kosmosa, 1995, no. 5, pp. 3–17.Google Scholar
- Morozova, A.L. and Pudovkin, M.I., Variations in atmospheric pressure during solar proton events and Forbush-decreases in GCR for different climatic zones, Proc. of the Int. Conf. “The Sun in the Age of Magnetic Field Sign Change”, St. Petersburg: GAO RAN, 2001, pp. 297–304.Google Scholar
- Pudovkin, M.I. and Raspopov, O.M., A mechanism of the solar activity effect on the lower atmosphere state and meteorological parameters, Geomagn. Aeron., 1992, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
- Timofeev, V.E., Grigor’ev, V.G., Morozova, E.I., Skryabin, N.G., and Samsonov, S.N., Effect of cosmic rays on the latent energy of the atmosphere, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2003, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 636–640.Google Scholar
- Usoskin, I.G., Cosmic rays and climate forcing, Mem. Soc. Astron. Ital., 2011, vol. 82, pp. 937–942.Google Scholar