Geomagnetism and Aeronomy

, Volume 49, Issue 1, pp 104–109 | Cite as

Possible relation of emergencies during spacecraft launches from the Plesetsk site to high-latitude geomagnetic disturbances

  • N. V. Romanova
  • V. A. Chizhenkov
  • V. A. Pilipenko


The relation of the series of carrier rocket emergency launches to geomagnetic activity and season is statistically analyzed. The data on the successful and emergency launches of more than ten types of different carrier rockets from the Plesetsk site for about 40 years (from 1966 to 2005) have been processed. It has been indicated that the relative number of emergencies during launches in summer is more than twice as high as in other seasons. An additional summer factor is statistically related to high-latitude geomagnetic activity. The effect remains unclear.

PACS numbers



Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. A. V. Belov, J. Villoresi, L. I. Dorman, et al., “Effect of the Space on Operation of Satellites,” Geomagn. Aeron. 44(4), 502–510 (2004) [Geomagn. Aeron. 44, 461–468 (2004)].Google Scholar
  2. A. R. Frederickson, “Upsets Related to Spacecraft Charging,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., No. 43, 426–441 (1996).Google Scholar
  3. D. Hazen, W. Roeder, B. Boyd, et al., “Weather Impact on Launch Operations at the Eastern Range and Kennedy Space Center,” in Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Aviation Weather Systems, Dallas, 1995, pp. 270–275.Google Scholar
  4. N. Iucci, A. E. Levitin, A. V. Belov, et al., “Space Weather Conditions and Spacecraft Anomalies in Different Orbits,” Space Weather, No. 3 (2005).Google Scholar
  5. M. C. Kelley, U. V. Fahleson, G. Holmgren, et al., “Generation and Propagation of an Electromagnetic Pulse in the Trigger Experiment and Its Possible Role in Electron Acceleration,” J. Geophys. Res. 85(10), 5055–5060 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. H. S. Koons, P. F. Mizera, J. L. Roeder, and J. F. Fennell, “Severe Spacecraft-Charging Event on SCATHA in September, 1982,” J. Spacecr. Rockets 25, 239–243 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. V. Pilipenko, E. Fedorov, K. Mursula, and T. Pihharainen, “Generation of Magnetic Noise Bursts during Distant Rocket Launches,” Geophysica 41, 57–72 (2005).Google Scholar
  8. V. Pilipenko, N. Yagova, N. Romanova, and J. Allen, “Statistical Relationships between the Satellite Anomalies at Geostationary Orbits and High-Energy Particles,” Adv. Space Res. 37(6), 1192–1205 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. N. V. Romanova, V. A. Pilipenko, N. V. Yagova, and A. V. Belov, “Statistical Relation between the Malfunction Rate on Geostationary Satellites and Fluxes of Energetic Electrons and Protons,” Kosm. Issled. 43(3), 186–193 (2005).Google Scholar
  10. D. F. Webb and J. H. Allen, “Spacecraft and Ground Anomalies Related to the October–November 2003 Solar Activity,” Space Weather 6(2004).Google Scholar
  11. D. C. Wilkinson, “NOAA’s Spacecraft Anomaly Database and Examples of Solar Activity Affecting Space-craft,” J. Spacecr. 31, 160–165 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. G. L. Wrenn, “Conclusive Evidence for Internal Dielectric Charging Anomalies in Geosynchronous Communications Spacecraft,” J. Spacecr. 32, 514–520 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. A. W. Yau and B. A. Whalen, “Auroral Perturbation Experiments,” Adv. Space Res. 8(1), 67–77 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. V. Romanova
    • 1
  • V. A. Chizhenkov
    • 1
  • V. A. Pilipenko
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Physics of the EarthRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Space Research InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations