Geomagnetism and Aeronomy

, Volume 49, Issue 1, pp 1–13 | Cite as

Variations in the cosmic ray fluxes, modulated by the solar and terrestrial magnetic fields, and climate changes. Part 3: A time interval of 1.5 Myr, including the pleistocene

  • V. A. DergachevEmail author
  • P. B. Dmitriev
  • O. M. Raspopov
  • H. Jungner


The most reliable data on a change in the intensity of cosmic rays and geomagnetic field on large time scales have been analyzed, and the relations between changes in these processes and climate during the last 1.5 Myr have been studied. An analysis indicated that the climate of the Earth is affected by changes in the Earth’s orbit parameters and geomagnetic dipole values; however, the climate responds to these changes with a delay of 10 kyr and immediately, respectively. In this case about two thirds of the effect of eccentricity on 18O is implemented via an intermediate chain: virtual axial dipole moment, changes in which can be related to changes in eccentricity. Thus, an analysis of the accumulated data on the processes, proceeding in the Earth’s atmosphere during the interaction with cosmic rays on the scales of several years to several hundreds of thousand years, indicates that the cosmophysical factor of influence on climate cannot be rejected. To make the conclusion more convincing, it is necessary to collect data for the studied time interval in a much wider region, to more accurately date samples, and to study the response of the climatic system to the external influence.

PACS numbers



Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. A. Aldahan and G. Possnert, “Geomagnetic and Climatic Variability Reflected by 10Be During the Quaternary and Late Pliocene,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 1301 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. A. A. Aldahan, Shi Ning, G. Possnert, et al., “10Be Records from Sediments of the Arctic Ocean Covering the Past 350 ka,” Mar. Geol. 144, 147–162 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. A. Berger, “Long Term History of Climate, Ice Ages and Milankovitch Periodicity,” The Sun in Time, Eds. by C. P. Sonnet, M. S. Giampapa, and M.S. Matthews, University of Arizona, 1992.Google Scholar
  4. A. Berger and M. F. Loutre, “Insolation Values for the Climate of the Last 10 Million Years,” Quat. Sci. Rev., No. 10, 297–317 (1991).Google Scholar
  5. J. Carcaillet, D. L. Bourle’s, N. Thouveny, and M. Arnold, “A High Resolution Authigenic 10Be/9Be Record of Geomagnetic Moment Variations over the Last 300 ka from Sedimentary Cores of the Portuguese Margin,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 219, 397–412 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. M. Christl, C. Strobl, and A. Mangini, “Beryllium-10 in Deep-Sea Sediments: A Tracer for the Earth’s Magnetic Field Intensity during the Last 200 kyr,” Quatn. Sci. Rev. 22, 725–739 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. V. A. Dergachev, P. B. Dmitriev, O. M. Raspopov, and X. Yungner, “Cosmic Ray Flux Variations, Modulated by the Solar and Terrestrial Magnetic Fields. Part 2: The Time Interval from ∼10 to ∼100 kyr Ago,” Geomagn. Aeron. 47(1), 116–125 (2007) [Geomagn. Aeron. 47, 109–117 (2007)].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. V. A. Dergachev, P. B. Dmitriev, O. M. Raspopov, and X. Yungner, “Cosmic Ray Flux Variations, Modulated by the Solar and Terrestrial Magnetic Fields. Part I: Time Interval from the Present to 10–12 kyr Ago (the Holocene Epoch),” Geomagn. Aeron. 46(1), 123–144 (2006) [Geomagn. Aeron. 46, 118–128 (2006)].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. M. Frank, B. Schwarz, S. Baumann, et al., “A 200 kyr Record of Cosmogenic Radionuclide Production Rate and Geomagnetic Field Intensity from 10Be in Globally Stacked Deep-Sea Sediments,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 149, 121–129 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. C. Fröhlich and J. Lean, “Solar Radiative Output and Its Variability: Evidence and Mechanisms,” Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 12(4), 273–320 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. B. van Geel, O. M. Raspopov, H. Renssen, et al., “The Role of Solar Forcing upon Climate Change,” Quat. Sci. Rev. 18, 331–338 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Y. Guyodo and J. P. Valet, “Global Changes in Intensity of the Earth’s Magnetic Field during the Past 800 ka,” Nature 399, 249–252 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. J. Imbrie, J. D. Hays, D. G. Martinson, et al., “The Orbital Theory of Pleistocene Climate: Support from a Revised Chronology of the Marine 18O Record,” NATO ASI, Ser. N: Math. Phys. Sci. 126, 269–305 (1984).Google Scholar
  14. D. V. Kent and N. D. Opdyke, “Paleomagnetic Field Intensity Recorded in a Brunhes Epoch Deep-Sea Sediment Core,” Nature 266, 156–159 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. J. Kirkby, A. Mangini, and R. A. Muller, arXiv:physics/0407005v1.Google Scholar
  16. L. E. Lisiecki and M. E. Raymo, “A Plio-Pleistocene Stack of 57 Globally Distributed Benthic δ18O Records,” Paleoceanography 20, A1003 (2005).Google Scholar
  17. L. Meynadier, J.-P. Valet, R. Weeks, et al., “Relative Geomagnetic Intensity of the Field during the Last 140 ka,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 114, 39–57 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. M. Milankovich, Mathematic Climatology and Astronomic Theory of Climate Changes (GONTI, Moscow, 1939) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  19. R. A. Muller and MacDonald, Ice Ages and Astronomical Causes (Publ. Ltd., Chichester, 2000).Google Scholar
  20. D. A. Patterson and K. A. Farley, “Extraterrestrial 3He in Seafloor Sediments: Evidence for Correlated 100 kyr Periodicity in the Accretion Rate of Interplanetary Dust, Orbital Parameters, and Quaternary Climate,” Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 62, 3669–3682 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. G. M. Raisbeck, F. Yiou, O. Cattani, and J. Jouzel, “10Be Evidence for the Matuyama—Brunhes Geomagnetic Reversal in the EPICA Dome C Ice Core,” Nature 444, 82–84 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. A. P. Roberts, M. Winklhofer, Liang Wen-Tzong, and Horng Chorng-Shern, “Testing the Hypothesis of Orbital (Eccentricity) Influence on Earth’s Magnetic Field,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 216, 187–192 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. N. J. Shackleton, A. Berger, and W. R. Peltier, “An Alternative Astronomical Calibration of the Lower Pleistocene Timescale Based on ODP Site 677,” Trans. R. Soc. Edinburgh, Earth Sci. 81, 251–261 (1990).Google Scholar
  24. N. Thouveny, J. Carcaillet, E. Moreno, et al., “Geomagnetic Moment Variation and Paleomagnetic Excursions Since 400 kyr BP: A Stacked Record from Sedimentary Sequences of the Portuguese Margin,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 219, 377–396 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. J.-P. Valet and L. Meynadier, “Geomagnetic Field Intensity and Reversals during the Past Four Million Years,” Nature 366, 234–238 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. J.-P. Valet, L. Meynadier, and Y. Guyodo, “Geomagnetic Dipole Strength and Reversal Rate over the Past Two Million Years,” Nature 435, 802–805 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. G. Wagner, J. Masarik, J. Beer, et al., “Reconstruction of the Geomagnetic Field between 20 and 60 kyr BP from Cosmogenic Radionuclides in the GRIP Ice Core,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A152, 597–604 (2000).Google Scholar
  28. G. Winckler, R. F. Anderson, M. Stute, and P. Schlosser, “Does Interplanetary Dust Control 100 kyr Glacial Cycles?,” Quat. Sci. Rev. 23(18–19), 1873–1878 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. H. U. Worm, “A Link between Geomagnetic Reversals and Events and Glaciation,” Earth. Planet. Sci. Lett. 141, 55–67 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. O. Yamazaki and H. Oda, “Orbital Influence on Earth’s Magnetic Field: 100 kyr Periodicity in Inclination,” Science 295, 2435–2438 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. A. Dergachev
    • 1
    Email author
  • P. B. Dmitriev
    • 1
  • O. M. Raspopov
    • 2
  • H. Jungner
    • 3
  1. 1.Ioffe Physicotechnical InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere, and Radiowave Propagation, St. Petersburg BranchRussian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia
  3. 3.University of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations