Estimation of the effect of solar activity on the intensity of galactic cosmic rays
- 23 Downloads
The observations of solar activity (average monthly values of the international sunspot numbers and areas, solar radioemission flux at a wavelength of 10.7 cm) and galactic cosmic ray (GCR) intensity (average monthly values of the count rate of an omnidirectional Geiger counter at a maximum of the transition curve in the regions of Moscow and Murmansk and differences between these values) have been studied. The main aim of the studies was to assess the possibility of using the series of GCR values as an additional type of instrumental observations to predict solar activity. The results of an analysis made it possible to assess the degree of interrelation between the studied time series and, thereby, to confirm that GCRs, together with the characteristics of sunspot formation and solar radioemission flux at a wavelength of 10.7 cm, can be used to predict solar activity. The development of the current solar cycle has been predicted. It is assumed that the duration of this cycle will exceed the average value.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.G. A. Bazilevskaya, M. B. Krainev, Yu. I. Stozhkov, et al., “Long-Term Soviet Program for the Measurement of Ionizing Radiation in the Atmosphere,” J. Geomagn. Geoelectr. 43, 893–900 (1991).Google Scholar
- 3.A. V. Belov, R. T. Gushchina, V. N. Obridko, et al., “Connection of the Long-Term Modulation of Cosmic Rays with the Parameters of the Global Magnetic Field of the Sun,” Geomagn. Aeron. 42(6), 727–735 (2002) [Geomagn. Aeron. 42, 693–700 (2002)].Google Scholar
- 4.G. V. Demianov, V. I. Kaftan, and V. I. Zubinsky, Research Works of the SSC 8.1 of the International Association of Geodesy, Ed. by M. Poutanen and J. Kakkuri (Finnish Geodetic Inst., Kirkkonummi, 1999), pp. 127–132.Google Scholar
- 5.L. I. Dorman, Cosmic Ray Variations and Space Studies (Nauka, Moscow, 1965) [in Russian].Google Scholar
- 6.V. I. Kaftan, “Kinematic Modeling of the Main Solar Cycle,” in Multi-Wavelength Investigations of Solar Activity, Ed. by A.V. Stepanov, E.E. Benevolenskaya, and A.G. Kosovichev (Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2004), pp. 111–112.Google Scholar
- 7.V.I. Kaftan, S. K. Tatevyan, and T.V. Kasimenko, “Analysis of Periodicity and Long-Term Prediction of Solar Activity Variations,” in Proceedings of the 4th Sevastopol International Seminar “Fundamental and Applied Problems Monitoring and Prediction of Natural Disasters,” “Element-2001,” Sevastopol, 2001 (SINEKO, Sevastopol, 2001), pp. 1–16 [in Russian].Google Scholar
- 8.M. B. Krainev and W. R. Webber, Preprint No. 11, Lebedev Physical Institute, 2004.Google Scholar
- 9.V. I. Romanovskii, Application of Mathematical Statistics in Experiments (Gostekhizdat, Moscow, 1947) [in Russian].Google Scholar
- 10.Yu. I. Stozhkov, N. S. Svirzhevsky, and V. S. Makhmutov, Preprint No. 8, Lebedev Physical Institute, 2001.Google Scholar
- 11.A. Worthing and J. Geffner, Treatment of Experimental Data (Wiley, New York, 1944; Inostrannaya Literatura, Moscow, 1953).Google Scholar