Advertisement

Fluid Dynamics

, Volume 53, Issue 2, pp 200–211 | Cite as

Local Energy Dissipation Rate in an Agitated Vessel—a Comparison of Evaluation Methods

  • R. Šulc
  • P. Ditl
Article
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

There are two main groups of local turbulent energy dissipation rate (ε) evaluation methods, namely (i) velocity gradient methods and (ii) fitting the energy spectrum function. We calibrated our measurements and then applied these methods to evaluate ε from our measurements. The experiments were carried out in the region below the impeller, wherewe assumed the existence of local isotropic turbulence, which is the main assumption for all ε evaluation methods. However, the results differed from each other. Predictions obtained by the methods dealt with here are compared on the basis of our experimental program, which also brings in data obtained on relatively large vessels 0.3 and 0.4 m in inner diameter and two liquid viscosities under fully developed turbulence (Re > 50 000).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Bałdyga and J. R. Bourne, Turbulent Mixing and Chemical Reactions (Wiley, England, 1999).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Handbook of Industrial Mixing. Science and Practice, E.L. Paul, V. A. Atiemo-Obeng, and S. M. Kresta (Eds.) (Wiley, Hoboken, 2004).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Hinze, Turbulence (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Wu and G.K. Patterson, “Laser Doppler Measurements of Turbulent Flow Parameters in a StirredMixer,” Chem. Eng. Sci. 44, 2207 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S.M. Kresta and P. E. Wood, “The Flow Field Produced by a Pitched Blade Turbine: Characterization of the Turbulence and Estimation of the Dissipation Rate,” Chem. Eng. Sci. 48, 1761 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Ducci and M. Yianneskis, “Direct Determination of Energy Dissipation in Stirred Vessels with Two-Point LDA,” AIChE J. 51, 2133 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Zhao, Z. Gao, and Y. Bao, “Effects of the Blade Shape on the Trailing Vortices in Liquid Flow Generated by Disc Turbines,” Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 19, 232 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Liné, J. C. Cabelle, J. Morchain, D. Anne-Archand, and F. Augier, “On POD Analysis of PIV Measurements Applied to Mixing in a Stirred Vessel with a Shear Thinning Fluid,” Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 91, 2073 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Sheng, H. Meng, and R. O. Fox, “A Large Eddy PIVMethod for TurbulenceDissipation Rate Estimation,” Chem. Eng. Sci. 55, 4423 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. BenNun, M. Sheintuch, B. Kysela, J. Konfršt, and I. Fořt, “Semianalytical Characterization of Turbulence from Radial Impellers, with Experimental and Numerical Validation,” AIChE J. 61, 1413 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Šulc, V. Pešava, and P. Ditl, “Estimating the Local Turbulent Energy Dissipation Rate Using 2-D PIV Measurements and a 1-D Energy Spectrum Function,” Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering 49, 145 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    I. Fořt, A. Obeid, and V. Březina, “Flow of Liquid in a Cylindrical Vessel with a Turbine Impeller and Radial Baffles,” Coll. Czechoslov. Chem. Comm. 47, 226–239 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Šulc, V. Pešava, and P. Ditl, “Local Turbulent Energy Dissipation Rate in a Vessel Agitated by a Rushton Turbine,” Chemical and Process Engineering 36, 135 (2015).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. Šulc, and P. Ditl, “Local Turbulent Energy Dissipation Rate in an Agitated Vessel: New Approach to Dimensionless Definition,” Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering 51, 159 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    V. Delafosse, M. L. Collignon, M. Crine, and D. Toye, “Estimation of the Turbulent Kinetic Energy Dissipation Rate from 2D-PIV Measurements in a Vessel Stirred by an Axial Mixel TTP Impeller,” Chem.Eng.Sci. 66, 1728 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. Saarenrinne and M. Piirto, “Turbulent Kinetic Energy Dissipation Rate Estimation from PIV Vector Fields,” Exp. Fluids 29, S300 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Piirto, H. Eloranta, and P. Saarenrinne, “Interactive Software for Turbulence Analysis from PIV Data,” in: Proc. 10th Int. Symp. on Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics (Lisbon, Portugal, 2000).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    V. Baldi, D. Hann, and V. Yianneskis, “On the Measurement of Turbulence Energy Dissipation in Stirred Vessels with PIV Techniques,” in: Proc. 11th Int. Symp. Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics (Lisbon, Portugal, 2002).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    K. Sharp, K. Kim, and R. Adrian, “Dissipation Estimation around a Rushton Turbine Using Particle Image Velocimetry,” in: Proc. 9th Int. Symp. Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics (Lisbon, Portugal, 1998).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. N. Kolmogorov, “The Local Structure of Turbulence in Incompressible Viscous Fluid for Very Large Reynolds Numbers,” Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR 30, 301 (1941).ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    E. StåhlWernersson and C. Trägårdh, “Measurements and Analysis of High-Intensity Turbulent Characteristics in a Turbine-Agitated Tank,” Exp Fluids 28, 532 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    H.L. Grant, R.W. Stewart, and A. Moilliet, “Turbulence Spectra from a Tidal Channel,” J. Fluid Mech. 12, 241 (1962).ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    K. R. Sreenivasan, “On the Universality of the Kolmogorov Constant,” Phys Fluids 7, 2778 (1995).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    V. Zhou, S. Balusamy, and S. A. Hochgreb, “Tool for the Spectral Analysis of the Laser Doppler Anemometer Data of the Cambridge Stratified Swirl Burner,” Technical Report CUED/A-TURBO/TR.135, University of Cambridge (2012).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    R. A. Antonia, B. R. Satyaprakash, and A. K. M. F. Hussain, “Measurements of Dissipation Rate and Some Other Characteristics of Turbulent Plane and Circular Jets,” Phys. Fluids 23, 695 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Van Doorn, “On Taylor’s Hypothesis in Turbulent Shear Flows,” Internal Note 811123, Univ. of Missouri-Rolla (1981).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    G. Heskestad, “A Generalized Taylor Hypothesis with Application for High Reynolds Number Turbulent Shear Flows,” J. Appl.Mech. 32, 735 (1965).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringDepartment of Process EngineeringPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations