Advertisement

Entomological Review

, Volume 87, Issue 9, pp 1099–1108 | Cite as

Structure, function, and morphological conformity of the male and female genitalia in the true bug genus Pyrrhocoris fall. (Hymenoptera, Pyrrhocoridae)

  • D. A. Gapon
Article
  • 42 Downloads

Abstract

In representatives of the genus Pyrrhocoris examined, the male and female genitalia are highly congruent and possess a number of structures providing firm fixation of copulating individuals, at the same time ensuring a quick release of partners when necessary. Mechanic prevention of interspecific hybridization is realized in sympatric species and absent in allopatric ones.

Keywords

Entomological Review Mushroom Body Ejaculatory Duct Female Genitalia Dorsal Wall 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aukema, B. and Rieger, Ch., Catalogue of the Heteroptera of the Palaearctic Region (Ed.) (2001), Vol. 4.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bonhag, P.F. and Wick, J.R., “The Functional Anatomy of the Male and Female Reproductive Systems of the Milkweed Bug, Oncopeltus fasciatus (Dallas) (Heteroptera, Lygaeidae),” J. Morph. 93(2), 177–283 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dufour, L., “Anatomie générale des Dipteres,” Ann. Sci. Nat. 1, 244–264 (??).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dupuis, C., “Les génitalia des Hémiptères Hétéroptères (Génitalia externs des deux sexes; Voies ectodermiques femelles). Revue de la morphologie. Lexique de la nomenclature. Index bibliographique analytique,” Mém. Mus. Natur. Hist. Nat. (A) Zool. N. S. 6, 183–278 (1955).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gapon, D., “Inflation of Heteropteran Aedeagi Using Microcapillaries (Heteroptera, Pentatomidae),” Zoosyst. Ross. 9(1), 157–160 (2001).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ludwig, W., “Untersuchungen über den Copulationsapparat der Baumwanzen,” Z. Morph. Okol. Tiere 5(2), 291–380 (1926).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mayr, E., Zoological Species and Evolution (Moscow, 1968) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Merle, J., “Anatomie des appareils genitaux male et female et fonctionnement ovarien de Pyrrhocoris apterus (L.) (Hemiptera, Pyrrhocoridae),” Acta Entomol. Bohemoslov. 66(5), 275–288 (1969).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pavlovskii, E.N., “A Method of Fixation of Everting or Evaginating Insect Organs,” Entomol. Obozr. 30(3/4), 298–302 (1949).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pluot, D., “La spermathèque et les voies genitals femelles des Pyrrhocoridés (Hemiptera),” Ann. Soc. Entomol. France 6(4), 777–807 (1970).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pluot, D., “Données sur Scantius aegyptus, Hémiptère Pyrrhocoridae paléarctique, comparaison avec Pyrrhocoris apterus,” Ann. Soc. Entomol. France 14, 703–713 (1978).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Štys, P., Proceedings of XI International Congress of Entomology, Vienna, 1960 (Wien, 1960), Vol. 1, pp. 37–43.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. A. Gapon
    • 1
  1. 1.Rostov State UniversityRostov-on-DonRussia

Personalised recommendations