Advertisement

Doklady Biological Sciences

, Volume 488, Issue 1, pp 149–152 | Cite as

Jasmonic Acid Enhances the Potato Plant Resistance to the Salt Stress in Vitro

  • M. V. EfimovaEmail author
  • E. A. Mukhamatdinova
  • I. S. Kovtun
  • F. F. Kabil
  • Yu. V. Medvedeva
  • V. V. Kuznetsov
GENERAL BIOLOGY
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

The protective effect of jasmonic acid (JA) was evaluated under the stress conditions (100 mM NaCl). The potato plants Solanum tuberosum L, mid-season variety Lugovskoy, were used in the experiments. The plant-regenerants were grafted and grown in test tubes on the modified Murashige and Skoog agar medium in the absence (control) or presence of JA at concentrations of 0.001, 0.1, and 10 μM under the optimal conditions or with addition of NaCl. After 28 days of cultivation, the growth (stem and root lengths, tier and leaf numbers, and plant mass) and physiological (proline and photosynthetic pigment contents and teh osmotic potential of cell exudate) characteristics of the plants were assessed. Jasmonic acid (0.1 and 10 μM) has been demonstrated to display a pronounced protective effect on potato plants under the salt stress condition. JA abolished partially the negative salt effect on the main photosynthetic pigments and maintained the cell osmotic status during salinization.

Notes

FUNDING

The study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 17-54-61016-Egypt_a.

COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. This article does not contain any studies involving animals or human participants performed by any of the authors.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Pirbalouti, A.G., Sajjadi, S.E., and Parang, K., Arch. Pharm. Chem. Life Sci., 2014, vol. 347, pp. 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dar, T.A., Uddin, M., Khan, M.A., Hakeem, K.R., and Jaleel, H., Environ. Exp. Bot., 2015, vol. 115, pp. 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ahmad, P., Rasool, S., Gul, A., Sheikh, S.A., Ashraf, N.M., Kazi, A.M., and Gucel, S., Front. Plant Sci., 2016, vol. 7, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Qiu, Z., Gu, J., Zhu, A., Zhang, L., and Zhang, M., Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 2014, vol. 104, pp. 202–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Battal, P., Erez, M.E., Turker, M., and Berber, I., Ann. Bot. Fenn., 2008, vol. 45, pp. 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sanchez-Romera, B., Ruiz-Lozano, J.M., Li, G., Luu, D.T., Martinez-Ballesta, M.D.C., Carvajal, M., Zamarreno, A., Garcia-Mina, J.M., Maurel, C., and Aroca, R., Plant Cell Environ., 2014, vol. 37, pp. 995–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Ollas, C., Arbona, V., and Gomez-Cadenas, A., Plant Cell Environ., 2015, vol. 38, pp. 2157–2170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Faried, H.F., Ayyub, C.M., Amjad, M., and Ahmed, R., Pak. J. Agricult. Sci., 2016, vol. 53, pp. 17–25.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Efimova, M.V., Kolomeichuk, L.V., Boiko, E.V., Malofii, M.K., Vidershpan, A.N., Plyusnin, I.N., Golovatskaya, I.F., Murgan, O.K., and Kuznetsov, Vl.V., Fiziol. Rast., 2018, vol. 65, pp. 196–206.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Monzon, G.C., Pinedo, M., Lamattina, L., and Canal, L., Plant Growth Reg., 2012, vol. 66, pp. 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yu, X., Zhang, W., Zhang, Yu., Zhang, X., Lang, D., and Zhang, X., Funct. Plant Biol., 2018, vol. 46, pp. 197–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mansour, M.M.F. and Ali, E.F., Phytochemistry, 2017, vol. 140, pp. 52–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kovtun, I.S., Efimova, M.V., Malofii, M.K., and Kuznetsov, Vl.V., Dokl. Biol. Sci., 2019, vol. 484, pp. 19–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mir, M., John, R., Mohammed, A., Pravej, A., and Parvaiz, A., Sci. Rep., vol. 8, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. V. Efimova
    • 1
    Email author
  • E. A. Mukhamatdinova
    • 1
  • I. S. Kovtun
    • 1
  • F. F. Kabil
    • 2
  • Yu. V. Medvedeva
    • 1
  • V. V. Kuznetsov
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.National Research Tomsk State UniversityTomskRussia
  2. 2.Cairo University, Faculty of AgricultureGizaEgypt
  3. 3.Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations