Advertisement

Doklady Biological Sciences

, Volume 488, Issue 1, pp 145–148 | Cite as

Morphological Variability of the Mandible Shape of the Common Vole Microtus arvalis (Rodentia, Arvicolidae) Semi-species from the Hybrid Zone

  • T. A. MironovaEmail author
  • V. B. Sycheva
  • A. A. Martynov
  • A. R. Gromov
  • D. S. Kostin
  • V. A. Komarova
  • D. M. Krivonogov
  • L. A. Lavrenchenko
GENERAL BIOLOGY

Abstract—

The mandible shape of the common vole semi-species from the hybrid zone was studied for the first time using the methods of geometric morphometry. The hybrid specimens were found to display high morphological variability being closer to the parental Microtus obscurus than to M. arvalis form. The main trends of changes in the mandible shape were primarily observed in the horizontal plane.

Notes

FUNDING

The study was supported by the Russian Foundation of Basic Research, project no. 18–04–00563 A.

COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS

Conflict of interests. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement on the welfare of animals. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Meier, M.N., Orlov, V.N., and Skhol’, E.D., Dokl. Acad. Sci. USSR, 1969, vol. 118, no. 6, pp. 1411–1414.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Malygin, V.M., Zool. Zh., 1974, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 89–91.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jaarola, M., Martinkova, N., Gunduz, I., et al., Mol. Phylogen. Evol., 2004, vol. 33, pp. 647–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fink, S., Excoffier, L., and Heckel, G., Mol. Ecol., 2004, vol. 13, pp. 3501–3514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    DeWoody, J.A., Mutat. Res., 1999, vol. 439, pp. 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bulatova, N.Sh., Potapov, S.G., and Lavrenchenko, L.A., Russ. J. Genet., 2010, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 586–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lavrenchenko, L.A., Potapov, S.G., Bulatova, N.Sh., and Golenishchev, F.N., Dokl. Biol. Sci., 2009, vol. 426, pp. 222–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Malygin, V.M. and Panteleichuk Santush Luish, T.M., Dokl. Biol. Sci., 1996, vol. 348, pp. 266–270.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Meier, M.N., Golenishchev, F.N., Radzhabli, S.I., et al., Tr.Zool.Inst. Rus. Acad. Sci., 1996, vol. 232.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Okulova, N.M. and Baskevich, M.I., Dokl. Biol. Sci., 2007, vol. 412, pp. 43–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lashkova, E.I., Rashevskaya, A.V., and Mezhzherin, S.V., Nauk. Visn. Uzhgorod.Univ. Ser. Biol., 2014, vol. 37, pp. 10–13.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Klevezal,' G.A., Printsipy i metody opredeleniya vozrasta mlekopitayushchikh (Principles and Methods of Age Determination in Mammals), Moscow: KMK, 2007.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vasil'ev, A.G., Vasil’eva, I.A., and Shkurikhin, A.O., Geometricheskaya morfometriya: ot teorii k praktike (Geometric Morphometry: From Theory to Practice), Moscow: KMK, 2018.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pavlinov, I.Ya., Zh. Obshch. Biol., 2000, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 583–600.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rieseberg, L.H., Archer, M.A., and Wayne, R.K., Heredity, 1999, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 363–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. A. Mironova
    • 1
    Email author
  • V. B. Sycheva
    • 1
  • A. A. Martynov
    • 1
  • A. R. Gromov
    • 1
  • D. S. Kostin
    • 1
  • V. A. Komarova
    • 1
  • D. M. Krivonogov
    • 2
  • L. A. Lavrenchenko
    • 1
  1. 1.Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of the Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Arzamas Branch, Lobachevsky State Univercity of Nizhny NovgorodArzamasRussia

Personalised recommendations