Advertisement

Doklady Biological Sciences

, Volume 478, Issue 1, pp 12–15 | Cite as

Comparative Study of Pygidial Organization in Polychaetes of the Families Nephtyidae and Syllidae

  • V. V. StarunovEmail author
  • O. V. Zaitseva
General Biology

Abstract

The first comparative study of the polychaete pygidial region has been performed using confocal scanning microscopy and immunohistochemical methods. Fundamentally new data has been obtained on the pygidial organization in representatives the Nephtyidae and Syllidae families. Despite differences in the overall morphology of pygidium, it is characterized by a certain structural plan as a whole that can be the basis for that of all polychaetes. Some insignificant differences in the pygidial structure can be either species-specific or consequences of mutations and seem to have no fundamental importance for the general organization.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Balavoine, G. and Adoutte, A., Integrat. Compar. Biol., 2003, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beklemishev, V.N., Osnovy sravnitel’noi anatomii bespozvonochnykh, vol. 1: Promorfologiya (Principles of Comparative Anatomy of Invertebrates, vol. 1: Promorphology), Moscow: Nauka; 1964.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    de Rosa, R., Prud’homme, B., and Balavoine, G., Evol. Dev., 2005, vol. 7, pp. 574–587.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhirkov, I.A., Polikhety Severnogo Ledovitogo okeana (Polychetes of the Arctic Ocean), Moscow: Yanus-K, 2001.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ushakov, P.V., Mnogoshchetinkovye chervi dal’nevostochnykh morei SSSR (Polychaeta) (Polychetes (Polychaeta) of Far Eastern Seas of the Soviet Union) Moscow: Akademiya Nauk SSSR, 1955.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weigert, A., Helm, C., Meyer, M., Nickel, B., Arendt, D., Hausdorf, B., Santos, S.R., Halanych, K.M., Purschke, G., Bleidorn, C., and Struck, T.H., Mol. Biol. Evol., 2014, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1391–1401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Struck, T.H., Paul, C., Hill, N., Hartmann, S., Hosel, C., Kube, M., Lieb, B., Meyer, A., Tiedemann, R., Purschke, G., and Bleidorn, C., Nature, 2011, vol. 471, pp. 95–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Starunov, V.V. and Lavrova, O.B., Dokl. Biol. Sci., 2013, vol. 451, pp. 235–237.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Starunov, V.V., Dray, N., Belikova, E.V., Kerner, P., Vervoort, M., and Balavoine, G., BMC Evol. Biol, 2015, vol. 15, pp. 25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Starunov, V.V., Lavrova, O.B., and Tikhomirov, I.A., Vestn. S.-Peterb. Gos. Univ. Ser.3, 2010, vol. 2, pp. 13–19.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dixon-Bridges, K., Gladstone, W., and Hutchings, P., Zootaxa, 2014, vol. 3872, pp. 513–240.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gabriele, T. and Gianpaolo, G., Arch. Gynecol. Obstetr., 2013, vol. 288, pp. 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Abu-Abed, S., Dollé, P., Metzger, D., Beckett, B., Chambon, P., and Petkovich, M., Genes Dev., 2001, vol. 15, pp. 226–240.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zakin, L., Reversade, B., Kuroda, H., Lyons, K., and De Robertis, E., Development, 2005, vol. 132, pp. 2489–2499.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zoological InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.St. Petersburg State UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations