Advertisement

Doklady Biological Sciences

, Volume 464, Issue 1, pp 244–247 | Cite as

The lophophore innervation pattern of the inarticulate brachiopod Lingula anatina (Brachiopoda) supports monophyly of Lophophorata

General Biology

Abstract

Lophophore innervation in the brachiopod Lingula anatina has been investigated using immunocytochemistry and laser confocal microscopy. Three prominent nerves, namely, the main brachial nerve, the accessory brachial nerve, and the lower brachial nerve, have been found to extend along each brachium of the lophophore. Tentacle innervation is also described in detail. Comparative analysis revealed homologous nerves in lophophores of brachiopods, phoronids, and bryozoans. Similarities in tentacle innervation in these phyla of invertebrates have been detected. The results obtained confirm lophophore homology in different groups of lophophorates and provide evidence for monophyly of Lophophorata.

Keywords

Cerebral Ganglion Nerve Ring FMRF Amide Phorate Brachial Nerve 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hyman, L.H., The Invertebrates, vol. 5: Smaller Coelomate Groups, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Emig, C.C., Zool. Scripta, 1966, vol. 5, pp. 133–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Helmkampf, M., Bruchhaus, I., and Hausdorf, B., Proc. R. Soc. Ser. B, 2008, vol. 275, pp. 1927–1933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hausdorf, B., Helmkampf, M., Nesnidal, M., and Bruchhaus, I., Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 2010, vol. 55, pp. 1121–1127.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jang, K.H. and Hwang, Ui.W., BMC Genomics, 2009, vol. 10, no. 167, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nesnidal, M.P., Helmkampf, M., Meyer, A., Witek, A., Bruchhaus, I., et al., BMC Evol. Biol., 2013, vol. 13, no. 253, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Temereva, E.N. and Tsitrin, E.B., Front. Zool., 2014, vol. 11, no. 35, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Weber, A.V., Wanninger, A., and Schwaha, T.F., Front. Zool., 2014, vol. 11, no. 89, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shun’kina, K.V., Starunov, V.V., Zaitseva, O.V., and Ostrovskii, A.N., Zool. Zh., 2014, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 497–507.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shunkina, K.V., Zaytseva, O.V., Starunov, V.V., and Ostrovsky, A.N., Front. Zool., 2015, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bemmelen, J.Fv., Z. Naturwiss (Leipzig), 1883, vol. 16, pp. 88–161.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Blochmann, F., Untersuchungen uber den Bau der Brachiopoden I, Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rudwick, M.J.S., Living and Fossil Brachiopods, London: Hutchinson and Co., 1970.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Temereva, E.N. and Malakhov, V.V., Zoomorphology, 2011, vol. 130, pp. 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Temereva, E.N., Gebruk, A.A., and Malakhov, V.V., Zool. Anz., 2015, vol. 254, no. 3, pp. 16–38.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations