Advertisement

Cosmic Research

, Volume 56, Issue 6, pp 442–452 | Cite as

Dynamics of the Magnetospheric Magnetic Field during Strong Magnetic Storms in 2015 According to Measurements on Board Van Allen Probes and Modeling Results

  • I. S. Nazarkov
  • V. V. Kalegaev
  • N. A. Vlasova
  • E. A. Beresneva
  • S. Yu. Bobrovnikov
  • A. Prost
Article
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

The results of studies of proton flux dynamics of the ring current and magnetic field in the middle of radiation belts during two strong magnetic storms in 2015 (March 17–18, 2015 and June 22–23, 2015) with a close amplitude of Dst-variations (∣Dstmax∣ ~ 200 nT) are presented. An analysis of the experimental data obtained on board two space vehicles named Van Allen Probes (earlier: Radiation Belt Storm Probes, RBSP), located at an orbit close to equatorial is performed. Modeling of the ring current and magnetic field in the frames of the paraboloid model of Earth’s magnetosphere А2000 is conducted. Confirmation of the existence of a mechanism for ring current development and, respectively, geomagnetic storm under the action of a strong pulse of solar-wind pressure is obtained as a result of comparative analysis of ring current dynamics and the magnetic field in the middle of radiation belts during the main phases of two storms in 2015. It is found that during the magnetic storm of June 22–23, 2015, the development of the ring current during the main phase continued despite the northward turn of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) and the following period with positive Bz in the solar wind. The effect observed during June 22–23, 2015 is explained by the intensification of storm ring current due to a long and powerful pulse of the solar wind pressure that led to a nonadiabatic transport of the ring current particles to lower L shells.

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The data on the solar wind and geomagnetic indices were obtained from the Goddard Space Flight Center NASA (Omniweb) and World Data Center C2 for Geomagnetism, Kyoto. The experimental data for measurements on board the Van Allen Probes (RBSP) were obtained from the NASA/GSFC Space Physics Data Facility (SPDF), CDAWeb (the Coordinated Data Analysis Web) [https://cdaweb.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov]. The work was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, agreement No. 14.616.21.0084 (RFMEFI61617X0084).

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Alexeev, I.I., Kalegaev, V.V., Belenkaya, E.S., Bobrovnikov, S.Y., Feldstein, Y.I., and Gromova, L.I., The model description of magnetospheric magnetic field in the course of magnetic storm on January 9–12, 1997, J. Geophys. Res., 2001, vol. 106, no. A11, pp. 25683–25694.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tsyganenko, N.A., A model of the near magnetosphere with a dawn–dusk asymmetry 2. Parameterization and fitting to observations, J. Geophys. Res., 2002, vol. 107, no. A8. doi 10.1029/2001JA000220Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tsyganenko, N.A. and Sitnov, M.I., Modeling the dynamics of the inner magnetosphere during strong geomagnetic storms, J. Geophys. Res., 2005, vol. 110. doi 10.1029/2004JA010798Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tverskoy, B.A., Dinamika radiatsionnykh poyasov Zemli (Dynamics of the Earth’s Radiation Belts), Moscow: Nauka, 1968.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fälthammer, G.G., Effects of time-dependent electric fields on geomagnetically trapped radiation, J. Geophys. Res., 1965, vol. 70, pp. 2503–2510.ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Søraas, F., Oksavik, K., Aarsnes, K., et al., Storm time equatorial belt—an “image” of RC behavior, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2003, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 1052–1055. doi 10.1029/2002GL015636ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kalegaev, V.V., Vlasova, N.A., and Nazarkov, I.S., Dynamics of the ring current and ion fluxes at low altitudes during the February 27–28, 2014 magnetic storm, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2015, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 715–722.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ganushkina, N., Jaynes, A., and Liemohn, M., Space weather effects produced by the ring current particles, Space Sci. Rev., 2017, vol. 212, nos. 3–4, pp. 1315–1344.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vlasova, N.A. and Kalegaev, V.V., Dynamics of fluxes of protons with energies 30–80 keV during geomagnetic storms on January 21–22, 2005, and December 14–15, 2006, according to data from low-orbit satellites, Cosmic Res., 2014, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 411–420.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kalegaev, V.V., Vlasova, N.A., and Peng. Z., Dynamics of the magnetosphere during geomagnetic storms on January 21–22, 2005 and December 14–15, 2006, Cosmic Res., 2015, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 98–110.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Spence, H.E., Reeves, G.D., Baker, D.N., Blake, J.B., Bolton, M., et al., Science goals and overview of the energetic particle, composition, and thermal plasma (ECT) suite on NASA’s radiation belt storm probes (RBSP), Mission Space Sci. Rev., 2013, vol. 179, pp. 311–336. doi 10.1007/s11214-013-0007-5ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alexeev, I.I., Belenkaya, E.S., Kalegaev, V.V., et al., Magnetic storms and magnetotail currents, J. Geophys. Res., 1996, vol. 101, no. A4, pp. 7737–7747. doi 10.1029/95JA03509ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tsyganenko, N.A. and Sitnov, M.I., Magnetospheric configurations from a high-resolution data-based magnetic field model, J. Geophys. Res., 2007, vol. 112, no. A6. doi 10.1029/2007JA012260Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shue, J.-H., Song, P., Russel, C.T., et al., Magnetopause location under extreme solar wind conditions, J. Geophys. Res., 1998, vol. 103, no. A8, pp. 17691–17700. doi 10.1029/98JA01103ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hakkinen, L., Pulkkinen, T.I., Nevanlinna, H., Pirjola, R.J., and Tanskanen, E.I., Effect of induced currents on Dst and on magnetic variations at midlatitude stations, J. Geophys. Res., 2002, vol. 107. doi 10.1029/2001JA900130Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kalegaev, V.V., Alexeev, I.I., Makarenkov, E.V., and Ganyushkina, N.Yu., Modeling the Dst variation during magnetic storms, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2006, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 563–569.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Burton, R.K., McPherron, R.L., and Russell, C.T., An empirical relationship between interplanetary conditions and Dst, J. Geophys. Res., 1975, vol. 80, pp. 4204–4214.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tverskoy, B.A., Electric fields in the magnetosphere and the origin of trapped radiation, in Solar–Terrestrial Physics, Dyer, E.R., Ed., Dordrecht: Springer, 1972, pp. 697–717.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pavlov, N.N., Tverskaya, L.V., Tverskoy, B.A., and Chuchkov, E.A, Variations of energetic particles of radiation belts during the strong magnetic storm on March 24–26, 1991, Geomagn. Aeron., 1993, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 41–45.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. S. Nazarkov
    • 1
  • V. V. Kalegaev
    • 1
  • N. A. Vlasova
    • 1
  • E. A. Beresneva
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. Yu. Bobrovnikov
    • 1
  • A. Prost
    • 3
  1. 1.Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Faculty of Physics, Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia
  3. 3.ISAE-SUPAEROToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations