Cosmic Research

, Volume 55, Issue 5, pp 361–370 | Cite as

Large-size space debris flyby in low earth orbits

  • A. A. BaranovEmail author
  • D. A. Grishko
  • Y. N. Razoumny


the analysis of NORAD catalogue of space objects executed with respect to the overall sizes of upper-stages and last stages of carrier rockets allows the classification of 5 groups of large-size space debris (LSSD). These groups are defined according to the proximity of orbital inclinations of the involved objects. The orbits within a group have various values of deviations in the Right Ascension of the Ascending Node (RAAN). It is proposed to use the RAANs deviations' evolution portrait to clarify the orbital planes’ relative spatial distribution in a group so that the RAAN deviations should be calculated with respect to the concrete precessing orbital plane of the concrete object. In case of the first three groups (inclinations i = 71°, i = 74°, i = 81°) the straight lines of the RAAN relative deviations almost do not intersect each other. So the simple, successive flyby of group’s elements is effective, but the significant value of total ΔV is required to form drift orbits. In case of the fifth group (Sun-synchronous orbits) these straight lines chaotically intersect each other for many times due to the noticeable differences in values of semi-major axes and orbital inclinations. The intersections’ existence makes it possible to create such a flyby sequence for LSSD group when the orbit of one LSSD object simultaneously serves as the drift orbit to attain another LSSD object. This flyby scheme requiring less ΔV was called “diagonal.” The RAANs deviations’ evolution portrait built for the fourth group (to be studied in the paper) contains both types of lines, so the simultaneous combination of diagonal and successive flyby schemes is possible. The value of total ΔV and temporal costs were calculated to cover all the elements of the 4th group. The article is also enriched by the results obtained for the flyby problem solution in case of all the five mentioned LSSD groups. The general recommendations are given concerned with the required reserve of total ΔV and with amount of detachable de-orbiting units onboard the maneuvering platform and onboard the refueling vehicle.


ADR mission space debris orbital maneuvers summary characteristic velocity RAAN correction 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Satellite Catalogue. search.asp. Cited November 21, 2013.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kessler, D. and Cour-Palais, B., Collision frequency of artificial satellites: The creation of a debris belt, J. Geophys. Res., 1978, vol. 83, pp. 2637–2646.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liou, J.C. and Johnson, N.L., Characterization of the cataloged Fengyun-1C fragments and their long-term effect on the LEO environment, Adv. Space Res., 2009, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 1407–1415.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    White, A. and Lewis, H., An adaptive strategy for active debris removal, Adv. Space Res., 2014, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 1195–1206.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baranov, A.A. and Grishko, D.A., Ballistic aspects of large-size space debris flyby at low Earth near-circular orbits, J. Comput. Syst. Sci. Int., 2015, no. 4, pp. 639–650.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baranov, A.A., Grishko, D.A., and Mayorova, V.I., The features of constellations' formation and replenishment at near circular orbits in non-central gravity fields, Acta Astronaut., 2015, vol. 116, pp. 307–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baranov, A.A., Grishko, D.A., Medvedevskikh, V.V., and Lapshin, V.V., The flyby problem solution for large-size space debris at Sun-synchronous orbits, Cosmic Res., 2016, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 229–236.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baranov, A.A., Change of spacecraft position in a satellite system, Cosmic Res., 2008, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 215–218.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baranov, A.A. and Baranov, A.A., Jr., Algorithm for calculating satellite constellation deployment parameters, Kosm. Issled., 2009, vol. 47, no. 3, 256–262.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Labourdette, P. and Baranov, A., A software for rendezvous between near-circular orbits with large initial ascending node difference, in Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Space Flight Dynamics, Moscow, 2003, pp. 130–142.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Castronuovo, M., Active space debris removal: A preliminary mission analysis and design, Acta Astronaut., 2011, vol. 69, nos. 9–10, pp. 848–859.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sahara, H., Evaluation of a satellite constellation for active debris removal, Acta Astronaut., 2014, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 136–144.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Low Earth Orbit large debris removal using VASIMR®, Rocket space company Ad Astra™. Cited February 20, 2017.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Braun, V., Lüpken, A., Flegel, S., et al., Active debris removal of multiple priority targets, Adv. Space Res., 2013, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 1638–1648.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. Baranov
    • 1
    Email author
  • D. A. Grishko
    • 2
  • Y. N. Razoumny
    • 3
  1. 1.Keldysh Institute of Applied MathematicsRussian Academy of ScienceMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Bauman Moscow State Technical UniversityMoscowRussia
  3. 3.People’s Friendship UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations