Advertisement

Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves

, Volume 54, Issue 6, pp 673–680 | Cite as

Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of Combustion of Synthetic Fuel of Thermochemical Heat Recuperation Systems

  • D. I. Pashchenko
Article
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

CFD modeling of the combustion of synthetic fuel formed in the systems of thermochemical recuperation of waste flue gas heat due to steam methane reforming was performed using the ANSYS Fluent software. Scientific justification and validation of the physicomathematical approaches involved the ANSYS Fluent for the problems of modeling the combustion of multicomponent hydrogen-containing gas mixtures. Numerical results were validated against experimental data. A visual comparison of the flame contours obtained by burning syngas at Reynolds numbers of 600, 800, and 1000 was performed. In all cases there is obvious convergence of the results. Change in the temperature of the fuel–air mixture at the entrance to the combustion chamber was found to have no significant effect on the temperature of the combustion products. The obtained results are of practical importance for the design of burner units of high-temperature plants with thermochemical heat recuperation.

Keywords

hydrogen combustion syngas thermochemical recuperation CFD modeling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Soria, “World Energy Technology Outlook 2050,” Eur. Commission (Joint Res. Center, 2006), Vol.21.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. K. Chakravarthy, C. S. Daw, J. A. Pihl, and J. C. Conklin, “Study of the Theoretical Potential of Thermochemical Exhaust Heat Recuperation for Internal Combustion Engines,” Energy Fuels 24 (3), 1529–1537 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. K. Popov, I. N. Svistunov, A. B. Garyaev, and E. A. Serikov, “The Use of Thermochemical Recuperation in an Industrial Plant,” Energy 127, 44–51 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. I. Pashchenko, “Thermochemical Recovery of Heat Contained in Flue Gases by Means of Bioethanol Reforming,” Therm. Eng. 60 (6), 438–443 (2013).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Verkhivker and V. Kravchenko, “The Use of Chemical Recuperation of Heat in a Power Plant,” Energy 29 (3), 379–388 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. I. Pashchenko and M. N. Nikitin, “Thermochemical Recuperation Flue Gas Heat and Its Solutions,” Prom. Energ., No. 6, 47–50 (2012).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. I. Pashchenko and I. S. Naplekov, “ANSYS CFD Modeling of the Characteristics of a Steam Ejector for Heating Oil and Oil Products,” Ekspoz. Neft Gaz, No. 2(68), 54–58 (2018).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. O. Glushkov, G. V. Kuznetsov, and P. A. Strizhak, “Numerical Study of the Effect of Burnout on the Ignition Characteristics of Polymer under Local Heating,” Fiz. Goreniya Vzryva 53 (2), 59–70 (2017) [Combust., Expl., Shock Waves 53 (2), 176–186 (2017)].Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Pashchenko, “Comparative Analysis of Hydrogen/Air Combustion CFD-Modeling for 3D and 2D Computational Domain of Micro-Cylindrical Combustor,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 42 (49), 29545–29556 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Arablu and E. Poursaedi, “Using CFD for NOx Emission Simulation in a Dual Fuel Boiler,” Fiz. Goreniya Vzryva 47 (4), 59–69 (2011) [Combust., Expl., Shock Waves 47 (4), 426–436 (2011)].Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. Pashchenko, “First Law Energy Analysis of Thermochemical Waste-Heat Recuperation by Steam Methane Reforming,” Energy 143, 478–487 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. De, E. Oldenhof, P. Sathiah, and D. Roekaerts, “Numerical Simulation of Delft-Jet-in-Hot-Coflow (DJHC) Flames Using the Eddy Dissipation Concept Model for Turbulence–Chemistry Interaction,” Flow, Turb. Combust. 87 (4), 537–567 (2011).CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Z. L. Wei, H. S. Zhen, C. W. Leung, and C. S. Cheung, “Heat Transfer Characteristics and the Optimized Heating Distance of Laminar Premixed Biogas–Hydrogen Bunsen Flame Impinging on a Flat Surface,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 40 (45), 15723–15731 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    B. Rajh, C. Yin, N. Samec, M. Hribersek, and F. Kokal, “CFD Modeling and Energy of Waste-to-Energy Plant Burning Waste Wood,” in Proc. of the 14th Int. Waste Management and Landfill Symp. (CISA, Padova, Italy, 2013).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Y. Wenming, J. Dongyue, C. K. Y. Kenny, and Z. Dan, “Combustion Process and Entropy Generation in a Novel Microcombustor with a Block Insert,” Chem. Eng. J. 274, 231–237 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. F. Modest, Radiative Heat Transfer (Academic Press, 2003).CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. Jiaqiang, W. Zuo, X. Liu, Q. Peng, and Y. Deng, “Effects of Inlet Pressure on Wall Temperature and Exergy Efficiency of the Micro-Cylindrical Combustor with a Step,” Appl. Energy 175, 337–345 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    P. A. Batrakov, A. N. Mrakin, and A. A. Selivanov, “Numerical Study of the Formation of Nitric Oxide in Combustors of a Non-Circular Profile,” Din. Sist., Mekhaniz. Mashin 2 (1), 318–322 (2016).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Samara State Technical UniversitySamaraRussia

Personalised recommendations