Biochemistry (Moscow)

, Volume 83, Issue 9, pp 1117–1123 | Cite as

Recovery of Impaired Memory: Expression of c-Fos and Egr-1 Transcription Factors during Restoration of Damaged Engram in the Chick Brain

  • A. A. Tiunova
  • D. V. Bezriadnov
  • N. V. Komissarova
  • K. V. AnokhinEmail author


Impairment of protein synthesis in the brain during learning prevents memory consolidation and results in amnesia, which until recently has been regarded irreversible. However, in some cases impaired memory could be restored by various “reminder” stimuli. The present study is based on the hypothesis that even in behaviorally profound amnesia, some disintegrated fragments of the engram are preserved in the brain and could be re-integrated into the whole system by specific types of stimuli. The aim of the present study was to test this hypothesis in an experimental model of pharmacologically induced memory impairment in young chicks and to reveal the brain areas involved in this process by mapping of reminder-induced expression of transcriptional factors c-Fos and Egr-1. We show that reminder treatment results in the recovery of memory impaired by protein synthesis inhibition during learning and induces c-Fos and Egr-1 expression in the brain regions involved in learning in this behavioral model. The patterns of c-Fos and Egr-1 induced expression in animals with impaired memory differed from the patterns of animals with unimpaired memory and as well as naпve animals with no memory. Thus, analysis of activity-induced c-Fos and Egr-1 expression revealed the brain regions that were specifically activated by the reminder treatment. At the behavioral level, this treatment led to memory recovery. Altogether, these results suggest that the reminder-induced transcriptional activity in the brain of amnestic animals occurs in regions maintaining the engram fragments that reintegrate to recover the impaired memory.


memory amnesia brain engram gene expression c-Fos Egr-1 



arcopallium intermedium




hyperpallium densocellulare




intermedial medial mesopallium


methyl anthranilate


medial striatum


physiological saline


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    McGaugh, J. L. (2000) Memory-a century of consolidation, Science, 287, 248–251.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kandel, E. R. (2001) The molecular biology of memory storage: a dialogue between genes and synapses, Science, 294, 1030–1038.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dudai, Y. (2004) The neurobiology of consolidations, or, how stable is the engram? Annu. Rev. Psychol., 55, 51–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anokhin, K. V. (2005) Memory consolidation: narrowing the gap between systems and molecular genetics neuro-sciences, in Complex Brain Functions: Conceptual Advances in Russian Neuroscience (Miller, R., Ivanitsky, A. M., and Balaban, P. M., eds.), CRC Press, Amsterdam, pp. 51–71.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sweatt, J. D. (2016) Neural plasticity and behavior-sixty years of conceptual advances, J. Neurochem., 139, 179–199.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mactutus, C. F., Ferek, J. M., and Riccio, D. C. (1980) Amnesia induced by hyperthermia: an unusually profound, yet reversible, memory loss, Behav. Neural Biol., 30, 260–277.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Radyushkin, K. A., and Anokhin, K. V. (1999) Recovery of memory in chicks after disruption during learning: the reversibility of amnesia induced by protein synthesis inhibitors, Neurosci. Behav. Physiol., 29, 31–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hardt, O., Wang, S. H., and Nader, K. (2009) Storage or retrieval deficit: the yin and yang of amnesia, Learn. Mem., 16, 224–230.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Squire, L. R. (2006) Lost forever or temporarily misplaced? The long debate about the nature of memory impairment, Learn. Mem., 13, 522–529.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nader, K., and Wang, S. H. (2006) Fading in, Learn. Mem., 13, 530–535.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Amelchenko, E. M., Zvorykina, S. W., Bezriadnov, D. V., Chekhov, S. A., and Anokhin, K. V. (2013) Possibility of memory reparation: conditioned freezing disrupted by protein synthesis inhibition can be restored by reminder stimulation in mice, Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat. im. I. P. Pavlova, 63, 227–234.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Clayton, D. F. (2013) The genomics of memory and learning in songbirds, Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet., 14, 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rose, S. P. (2000) God’s organism? The chick as a model system for memory studies, Learn. Mem., 7, 1–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davis, J. L., Masuoka, D. T., Gerbrandt, L. K., and Cherkin, A. (1979) Autoradiographic distribution of L-proline in chicks after intracerebral injection, Physiol. Behav., 22, 693–695.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kuenzel, W. J., and Masson, M. (1988) A Stereotaxic Atlas of the Brian of the Chick (Gallus domesticus), The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gilbert, D. B., Patterson, T. A., and Rose, S. P. (1991) Dissociation of brain sites necessary for registration and storage of memory for a one-trial passive avoidance task in the chick, Behav. Neurosci., 105, 553–561.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Csillag, A. (1999) Striato-telencephalic and striato-tegmental circuits: relevance to learning in domestic chicks, Behav. Brain Res., 98, 227–236.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Deng, C., and Rogers, L. J. (2000) Organization of intrate-lencephalic projections to the visual Wulst of the chick, Brain Res., 856, 152–162.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shimizu, T., Cox, K., and Karten, H. J. (1995) Intratelencephalic projections of the visual Wulst in pigeons (Columba livia), J. Comp. Neurol., 359, 551–572.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Canal, C. E., Chang, Q., and Gold, P. E. (2007) Amnesia produced by altered release of neurotransmitters after intraamygdala injections of a protein synthesis inhibitor, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 12500–12505.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sharma, A. V., Nargang, F. E., and Dickson, C. T. (2012) Neurosilence: profound suppression of neural activity following intracerebral administration of the protein synthesis inhibitor anisomycin, J. Neurosci., 32, 2377–2387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nikolakopoulou, A. M., Davies, H. A., and Stewart, M. G. (2006) Passive avoidance training decreases synapse density in the hippocampus of the domestic chick, Eur. J. Neurosci., 23, 1054–1062.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Knapska, E., and Kaczmarek, L. (2004) A gene for neuronal plasticity in the mammalian brain: Zif268/Egr-1/NGFI-A/Krox-24/TIS8/ZENK? Prog. Neurobiol., 74, 183–211.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Solomonia, R. O., and McCabe, B. J. (2015) Molecular mechanisms of memory in imprinting, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 50, 56–69.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Herold, C., Paulitschek, C., Palomero-Gallagher, N., Gunturkun, O., and Zilles, K. (2018) Transmitter receptors reveal segregation of the arcopallium/amygdala complex in pigeons (Columba livia), J. Comp. Neurol., 526, 439–466.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Matsushima, T., Izawa, E., Aoki, N., and Yanagihara, S. (2003) The mind through chick eyes: memory, cognition and anticipation, Zool. Sci., 20, 395–408.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lowndes, M., and Davies, D. C. (1994) The effects of archistriatal lesions on one-trial passive avoidance learning in the chick, Eur. J. Neurosci., 6, 525–530.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Patzke, N., Manns, M., and Gunturkun, O. (2011) Telencephalic organization of the olfactory system in homing pigeons (Columba livia), Neuroscience, 194, 53–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nakamori, T., Maekawa, F., Sato, K., Tanaka, K., and Ohki-Hamazaki, H. (2013) Neural basis of imprinting behavior in chicks, Dev. Growth Differ., 55, 198–206.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. Tiunova
    • 1
  • D. V. Bezriadnov
    • 1
  • N. V. Komissarova
    • 1
  • K. V. Anokhin
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.P. K. Anokhin Research Institute of Normal PhysiologyMoscowRussia
  2. 2.National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”MoscowRussia
  3. 3.Lomonosov Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations