Biochemistry (Moscow)

, Volume 80, Issue 11, pp 1500–1507 | Cite as

Modeling interactions of erythromycin derivatives with ribosomes

  • A. V. Shishkina
  • T. M. Makarova
  • A. G. Tereshchenkov
  • G. I. Makarov
  • G. A. KorshunovaEmail author
  • A. A. Bogdanov


Using a method of static simulation, a series of erythromycin A analogs was designed with aldehyde functions introduced instead of one of the methyl substituents in the 3′-N-position of the antibiotic that was potentially capable of forming a covalent bond with an amino group of one of the nucleotide residues of the 23S rRNA in the ribosomal exit tunnel. Similar interaction is observed for antibiotics of the tylosin series, which bind tightly to the large ribosomal subunit and demonstrate high antibacterial activity. Binding of novel erythromycin derivatives with the bacterial ribosome was investigated with the method of fluorescence polarization. It was found that the erythromycin analog containing a 1-methyl-3oxopropyl group in the 3′-N-position demonstrates the best binding. Based on the ability to inhibit protein biosynthesis, it is on the same level as erythromycin, and it is significantly better than desmethyl-erythromycin. Molecular dynamic modeling of complexes of the derivatives with ribosomes was conducted to explain the observed effects.


ribosomal tunnel macrolides erythromycin modeling 



4,4-difluoro-4-bora-5,7-dimethyl3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene-3-pentanoic acid






liquid chromatography/mass-spectrometry


peptidyl transferase center


ribosomal tunnel


X-ray diffraction analysis


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Sunazuka, T., Omura, S., Iwasaki, S., and Mura, S. (2002) Macrolide Antibiotics: Chemistry, Biology, and Practice, 2nd Edn., Elsevier Science, p. 100.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bottger, E. C., Springer, B., Prammananan, T., Kidan, Y., and Sander, P. (2001) Structural basis for selectivity and toxicity of ribosomal antibiotics, EMBO Rep., 2, 318–323.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hansen, J., Ippolito, J. A., Ban, N., Nissen, P., Moore, P. B., and Steitz, T. A. (2002) The structures of four macrolide antibiotics bound to the large ribosomal subunit, Mol. Cell, 10, 117–128.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kirst, H. A., Toth, J. E., Debono, M., Willard, K. E., Truedell, B. A., Ott, J. L., Counter, F. T., Felty-Duckworth, A. M., and Pekarek, R. S. (1988) Synthesis and evaluation of tylosin-related macrolides modified at the aldehyde function: a new series of orally effective antibiotics, J. Med. Chem., 31, 1631–1641.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Starosta, A. L., Karpenko, V. V., Shishkina, A. V., Micolajka, A., Sumbatyan, N. V., Schlunzen, F., Korshunova, G. A., Bogdanov, A. A., and Wilson, D. N. (2010) Interplay between the ribosomal tunnel, nascent chain, and macrolides influences drug inhibition, Chem. Biol., 17, 504–514.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Freiberg, L. A. (1973) Process for the demethylation of 3aminomacrolides, US Patent 3725385.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Noll, M., Hapke, B., and Noll, H. (1973) Structural dynamics of bacterial ribosomes, II. Preparation and characterization of ribosomes and subunits in the translation of natural messenger RNA, J. Mol. Biol., 80, 519–529.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yan, K., Hunt, E., Berge, J., May, E., Copeland, R. A., and Gontarek, R. R. (2005) Fluorescence polarization method to characterize macrolide–ribosome interactions, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 49, 3367–3372.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang, Z. X. (1995) An exact mathematical expression for describing competitive binding of two different ligands to a protein molecule, FEBS Lett., 360, 111–114.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Svetlov, M. S., Kommer, A., Kolb, V. A., and Spirin, A. S. (2006) Effective cotranslational folding of firefly luciferase without chaperones of the Hsp70 family, Protein Sci., 15, 242–247.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jack, A., Dunkle, J. A., Xiong, L., Mankin, A. S., and Cate, J. H. D. (2010) Structures of the Escherichia coli ribosome with antibiotics bound near the peptidyl transferase center explain spectra of drug action, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 17152–17157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Van der Spoel, D., Lindahl, E., Hess, B., Groenhof, G., Mark, A. E., and Berendsen, H. J. C. (2005) GROMACS: fast, flexible, free, J. Comput. Chem., 26, 1701–1718.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hess, B., Kutzner, C., Van der Spoel, D., and Lindahl, E. (2008) GROMACS 4: algorithms for highly efficient, loadbalanced, and scalable molecular simulation, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 4, 435–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bussi, G., Donadio, D., and Parrinello, M. (2007) Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling, J. Chem. Phys., 126, doi: 10.1063/1.2408420.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Berendsen, H. J. C., Postma, J. P. M., Van Gunsteren, W. F., DiNola, A., and Haak, J. R. (1984) Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath, J. Chem. Phys., 81, 3684–3690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Darden, T., York, D., and Pedersen, L. (1993) Particle mesh Ewald: an N log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems, J. Chem. Phys., 98, 10089–10092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jorgensen, W. L., Chandrasekhar, J., and Madura, J. D. (1983) Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water, J. Chem. Phys., 79, 926–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Athavale, S. S., Petrov, A. S., Hsiao, C., Watkins, D., Prickett, C. D., Gossett, J. J., Lie, L., Bowman, J. C., O’Neill, E., Bernier, C. R., Hud, N. V., Wartell, R. M., Harvey, S. C., and Williams, L. D. (2012) RNA-folding and catalysis mediated by iron(II), PLoS One, 7, e38024.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Clark, R. F., Ma, Z., Wang, S., Griesgraber, G., Tufano, M., Yong, H., Li, L., Zhang, X., Nilius, A. M., Chu, D. T. W., and Or, Y. S. (2000) Synthesis and antibacterial activity of novel 6-O-substituted erythromycin A derivatives, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 10, 815–819.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eash, K. J., Pulia, M. S., Wieland, L. C., and Mohan, R. S. (2000) A simple chemoselective method for the deprotection of acetals and ketals using bismuth nitrate pentahydrate, J. Org. Chem., 65, 8399–8401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    LeTourneau, N., Vimal, P., Klepacki, D., Mankin, A., and Melman, A. (2012) Synthesis and antibacterial activity of desosamine-modified macrolide derivatives, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 22, 4575–4578.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. V. Shishkina
    • 1
  • T. M. Makarova
    • 2
  • A. G. Tereshchenkov
    • 2
  • G. I. Makarov
    • 2
  • G. A. Korshunova
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. A. Bogdanov
    • 1
  1. 1.Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical BiologyLomonosov Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Faculty of ChemistryLomonosov Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations