Advertisement

Biochemistry (Moscow)

, Volume 78, Issue 9, pp 971–978 | Cite as

Arguments against non-programmed aging theories

  • T. C. GoldsmithEmail author
Phenoptosis

Abstract

Until recently, non-programmed theories of biological aging were popular because of the widespread perception that the evolution process could not support the development and retention of programmed aging in mammals. However, newer evolutionary mechanics theories including group selection, kin selection, and evolvability theory support mammal programmed aging, and multiple programmed aging theories have been published based on the new mechanics. Some proponents of non-programmed aging still contend that their non-programmed theories are superior despite the new mechanics concepts. However, as summarized here, programmed theories provide a vastly better fit to empirical evidence and do not suffer from multiple implausible assumptions that are required by non-programmed theories. This issue is important because programmed theories suggest very different mechanisms for the aging process and therefore different mechanisms behind highly age-related diseases and conditions such as cancer, heart disease, and stroke.

Keywords

Aging Theory Program Aging Program Theory Aging Mechanism Rigid Linkage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wynne-Edwards, V. (1986) Evolution Through Group Selection, Blackwell.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hamilton, W. (1963) Am. Naturalist, 97, 354–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dawkins, R. (1986) The Selfish Gene (revised edition), Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goldsmith, T. (2013) The Evolution of Aging (3rd Edn.) Azinet Press, Crownsville, MD, USA.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goldsmith, T. (2012) Biochemistry (Moscow), 77, Phenoptosis Issue (No. 7), 729–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Skulachev, V. (1997) Biochemistry (Moscow), 62, 1191–1195.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mittledorf, J. (2006) Evol. Ecol. Res., 8, 561–574.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Libertini, G. (2008) Sci. World J., 8, 182–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kirkwood, T., and Melov, S. (2011) Curr. Biol., 21, R701–R707.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Grey, A. (2007) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1119, 296–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Darwin, C. (1859) On the Origin of Species, John Murray, Albemarle Street, London.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Medawar, P. B. (1952) An Unsolved Problem of Biology, H. K. Lewis & Co., London.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Williams, G. (1957) Evolution, 11, 398–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Apfeld, J., and Kenyon, C. (1999) Nature, 402, 804–809.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spindler, S. (2005) Mech. Ageing Dev., 126, 960–966.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eriksson, M., Brown, W. T., Gordon, L. B., Glynn, M. W., Singer, J., Scott, L., Erdos, M. R., Robbins, C. M., Moses, T. Y., Berglund, P., Dutra, A., Pak, E., Durkin, S., Csoka, A. B., Boehnke, M., Glover, T. W., and Collins, F. S. (2003) Nature, 423, 293–298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gray, M., Shen, J., Kamath-Loeb, A., Blank, A., Sopher, B., Martin, G., Oshima, J., and Loeb, L. (1997) Nature Genet., 17, 100–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Poynter, J., Gurber, S. B., Higgins, P. D. R., Almog, R., Bonner, J. D., and Rennert, H. S. (2005) New England J. Med., 352, 2184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bennett, J. T., Boehlert, G. W., and Turekian, K. K. (1982) Maritime Biol., 71, 209–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Arantes-Oliveira, N., Apfeld, J., Dillin, A., and Kenyon, C. (2002) Science, 295, 502–505.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wodinsky, J. (1977) Science, 198, 948–951.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Goldsmith, T. (2010) Russ. J. Gen. Chem., 80, 1434–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Weismann, A. (1882) Uber die Dauer des Liebens, Fischer, Jena.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Azinet LLCCrownsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations