Advertisement

Biochemistry (Moscow)

, Volume 78, Issue 1, pp 41–52 | Cite as

Mechanisms of catalytic action and chemical modifications of endonucleases WEN1 and WEN2 from wheat seedlings

  • L. I. Fedoreyeva
  • B. F. VanyushinEmail author
Article

Abstract

Hydrolysis of DNA catalyzed by wheat endonucleases WEN1 and WEN2 is pronouncedly processive. A correlation has been revealed between appearance of new products of DNA hydrolysis with different length and conformational changes in the enzymes. The first conformational conversion of the endonucleases is associated with appearance of large fragments of DNA hydrolysis with length longer than 500 bp, and the second conversion is associated with formation of oligonucleotides with length of 120–140 bp, and the third conversion is associated with formation of short oligonucleotides and mononucleotides. Formation of the DNA-enzyme complex is accompanied by appearance of fluorescence at λ = 410–440 nm. The intensity, positions, and numbers of maximums of the fluorescence spectra of DNA-WEN1 and DNA-WEN2 complexes are different and depend on the methylation status of the DNA and on the presence of Mg2+. The endonucleases hydrolyze DNA by two mechanisms: one is metal-independent, and the other depends on one or two Mg2+ ions. One Mg2+ ion is located inside the catalytic center of WEN1, whereas the WEN2 center contains two Mg2+ ions. The first (sitespecific) stage of DNA hydrolysis does not depend on Mg2+. Mg2+ ions evoke changes in the site specificity of the endonuclease action (WEN1) and abolish their ability to recognize the methylation status of DNA. Products of DNA hydrolysis by endonucleases WEN1 and WEN2 in the presence of Mg2+ are similar in length (120–140 bp). The endonucleases have at least two centers (domains) — catalytic and substrate-binding. Two histidine and apparently two lysine plus two dicarboxylic amino acid residues are present inside the catalytic center of WEN1. The catalytic center of WEN2 contains at least one histidine residue and apparently two residues of aspartic or glutamic acid, which are involved in coordination of the metal ions. The catalytic centers of WEN1 and WEN2 seem to be formed, respectively, by HD/E(D/EK)KH and HD/ED/E amino acid residues. The site-specificity of the endonuclease action is due to the DNA-binding domain. This domain contains dicarboxylic amino acid residues, which seem to be responsible for sensitivity of the enzymes to the methylation status of DNA. The hydroxyl groups of tyrosine residues in the enzymes also seem to contribute to recognizing methylated bases in DNA.

Key words

endonucleases DNA hydrolysis kinetics catalytic mechanism DNA methylation wheat plants 

Abbreviations

bp

base pairs

WEN1, WEN2

wheat endonucleases

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aleksandrushkina, N. I., and Vanyushin, B. F. (2009) Fiziol. Rast., 56, 11–17.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Perez-Amador, M. A., Alber, M. L., Rocher, J. D., Thompson, D. M., Hoof, A. V., LeBrasseur, N. D., Ler, A., and Green, P. J. (2000) Plant Physiol., 122, 169–180.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aoyagi, S., Sugiyama, M., and Fukuda, H. (1988) FEBS Lett., 429, 134–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yupsanis, T., Symeonidis, L., Kalemi, T., Moustaka, H., and Yupsani, A. (2004) Plant Physiol. Biochem., 42, 795–802.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fedoreyeva, L. I., Sobolev, D. E., and Vanyushin, B. F. (2007) Epigenetics, 2, 50–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fedoreyeva, L. I., Sobolev, D. E., and Vanyushin, B. F. (2008) Biochemistry (Moscow), 73, 1000–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fedoreyeva, L. I., and Vanyushin, B. F. (2011) Biochemistry (Moscow), 76, 651–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fedoreyeva, L. I., and Vanyushin, B. F. (2012) Biochemistry (Moscow), 77, 485–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fedoreyeva, L. I., Smirnova, T. A., Kolomiitseva, G. Y., and Vanyushin, B. F. (2009) Biochemistry (Moscow), 74, 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bakeeva, L. E., Kirnos, M. D., Aleksandrushkina, N. I., Kazimirchyuk, S. B., Shorning, B. Y., Zamyatnina, V. A., Yaguzhinsky, L. S., and Vanyushin, B. F. (1999) FEBS Lett., 457, 122–125.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bradford, M. M. (1976) Analyt. Biochem., 72, 248–254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jois, P. S., Madhu, N., and Rao, D. N. (2008) Biochem. J., 410, 543–553.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eyzaguirre, J. (1996) Biol. Res., 29, 1–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Scatchard, D. (1949) Chem. Rev., 44, 7–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Favicchio, R., Dragan, A. I., Kneate, G. G., and Read, C. M. (2009) in Methods in Molecular Biology. DNA-Protein Interactions, 543, 589–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Beese, L. S., and Steitz, T. A. (1991) EMBO J., 10, 25–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stuckey, J. A., and Dixon, J. E. (1999) Nature Struct. Biol., 6, 278–284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Grindley, N. D., Whiteson, K. L., and Rice, P. A. (2006) Annu. Rev. Biochem., 75, 567–605.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grazulis, S., Manakova, E., Roessle, M., Bochtler, M., Tamulatiene, G., Huber, R., and Siksnys, V. (2005) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 15797–15802.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Buttner, S., Eisenberg, T., Carmona-Gutierrez, D., Ruli, D., Knauer, H., Ruckenstuhl, C., Sigrist, C., Wissing, S., Kollroser, M., Frohlich, K. U., Sigrist, S., and Madeo, F. (2007) Mol. Cell, 25, 233–246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ban, C., and Yang, W. (1998) EMBO J., 17, 1526–1534.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee, J. Y., Chang, J., Josheph, N., Ghirlando, R., Rao, D. N., and Yang, W. (2005) Mol. Cell, 20, 155–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Newman, M., Lunnen, K., Wilson, G., Greci, J., Schildkraut, I., and Phillips, S. E. (1998) EMBO J., 17, 5466–5476.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Suck, D., Oefner, C., and Kabsch, W. (1984) EMBO J., 3, 2423–2430.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.All-Russian Research Institute of Agricultural BiotechnologyRussian Academy of Agricultural SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical BiologyLomonosov Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations