Statistical analysis of unstructured amino acid residues in protein structures
- 66 Downloads
We have performed a statistical analysis of unstructured amino acid residues in protein structures available in the databank of protein structures. Data on the occurrence of disordered regions at the ends and in the middle part of protein chains have been obtained: in the regions near the ends (at distance less than 30 residues from the N- or C-terminus), there are 66% of unstructured residues (38% are near the N-terminus and 28% are near the C-terminus), although these terminal regions include only 23% of the amino acid residues. The frequencies of occurrence of unstructured residues have been calculated for each of 20 types in different positions in the protein chain. It has been shown that relative frequencies of occurrence of unstructured residues of 20 types at the termini of protein chains differ from the ones in the middle part of the protein chain; amino acid residues of the same type have different probabilities to be unstructured in the terminal regions and in the middle part of the protein chain. The obtained frequencies of occurrence of unstructured residues in the middle part of the protein chain have been used as a scale for predicting disordered regions from amino acid sequence using the method (FoldUnfold) previously developed by us. This scale of frequencies of occurrence of unstructured residues correlates with the contact scale (previously developed by us and used for the same purpose) at a level of 95%. Testing the new scale on a database of 427 unstructured proteins and 559 completely structured proteins has shown that this scale can be successfully used for the prediction of disordered regions in protein chains.
Key wordsunstructured regions intrinsically disordered regions natively unfolded proteins globular proteins stability
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 7.Romero, P., Obradovic, Z., Kissinger, C. R., Villafranca, L. E., and Dunker, A. K. (1997) Proc. IEE Int. Conf. on Neural Networks, pp. 90–95.Google Scholar
- 8.Li, X., Romero, P., Rani, M., Dunker, A. K., and Obradovic, A. Z. (1999) Genome Inform., 10, 30–40.Google Scholar
- 11.Galzitskaya, O. V., Garbuzynskiy, S. O., and Lobanov, M. Y. (2006) Mol. Biol. (Moscow), 40, 341–348.Google Scholar
- 19.Dunker, A. K., Lawson, J. D., Brown, C. J., Williams, R. M., Romero, P., Oh, J. S., Oldfield, C. J., Campen, A. M., Ratliff, C. M., Hipps, K. W., Ausio, J., Nissen, M. S., Reeves, R., Kang, C., Kissinger, C. R., Bailey, R. W., Griswold, M. D., Chiu, W., Garner, E. C., and Obradovic, Z. (2001) J. Mol. Graph. Model., 19, 26–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Williams, R. M., Obradovic, Z., Mathura, V., Braun, W., Garner, E. C., Young, J., Takayama, S., Brown, C. J., and Dunker, A. K. (2001) Pac. Symp. Biocomput., 89–100.Google Scholar
- 25.Melamud, E., and Moult, J. (2003) Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 53(Suppl. 6), 561–565.Google Scholar