Advertisement

Automation and Remote Control

, Volume 79, Issue 10, pp 1863–1870 | Cite as

Models and Algorithms of Automata Theory for the Control of an Aircraft Group

  • A. F. Rezchikov
  • V. A. Kushnikov
  • V. A. Ivashchenko
  • A. S. Bogomolov
  • L. Yu. Filimonyuk
Problems of Optimization and Simulation at Control of Development of Large-Scale Systems
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

We develop models and algorithms to control the process of landing aircraft under uncertainty of their positions in space caused by unfavorable, unforeseen external influences. As the objective function we consider the execution time of the dispatcher’s commands, and as constraints we introduce requirements for the safety of aircraft. Based on the developed formalism of generalized synchronization of linear automata, we develop an approach that makes it possible to reduce this problem to an integer linear programming problem. We consider an example of the use of the developed models and methods for controlling the aircraft landing process.

Keywords

critical combinations of events accident aircraft aviation linear automata finite state machine synchronization generalized state 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rezchikov, A., Kushnikov, V., Ivaschenko, V., Bogomolov, A., Filimonyuk, L., and Kachur, K., Control of the Air Transportation System with Flight Safety as the Criterion, in Automation Control Theory Perspectives in Intelligent Systems, Proc. 5th Computer Science On-line Conf. 2016 (CSOC2016), Springer Int. Publishing Switzerland, 2016, vol. 3, pp. 423–432.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bogomolov, A.S., Preventing Critical Combinations of Events in an Aviation Transportation System, in Proc. VII Int. Sci. Conf. “Computer Science and Information Technologies,” Saratov, 2016, pp. 79–84.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rezchikov, A.F. and Bogomolov, A.S., Critical Combinations of Events as Reasons for Failures in Human-Machine Systems, in Proc. VIII Int. Conf. “Managing Large-Scale Systems Development” (MLSD 2015), Moscow, 2015, vol. 1, pp. 130–135.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rezchikov, A.F. and Tverdokhlebov, V.A., Models and Methods for Finding Reasons for Critical Situations in Complex Systems, in Proc. VIII Intl. Conf. “Managing Large-Scale Systems Development” (MLSD 2015), Moscow, 2015, vol. 1, pp. 8214–8223.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Klyuev, V.V., Rezchikov, A.F., Kushnikov, V.A., Tverdokhlebov, V.A., Ivashchenko, V.A., Bogomolov, A.S., and Filimonyuk, L.Yu., Analysis of Critical Situations Caused by an Unfortunate Coincidence, Kontrol. Diagnost., 2014, no. 7, pp. 12–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Klyuev, V.V., Rezchikov, A.F., Bogomolov, A.S., and Filimonyuk, L.Yu., The Concept of a Complex Resource for Studies of Security for Human-Object-Environment Systems, Kontrol. Diagnost., 2013, no. 8, pp. 44–55.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bogomolov, A.S., Complex Control over Resources of Complex Human-Machine Systems, Izv. Saratov. Gos. Univ, Ser. Mat. Mekh. Informatika, 2013, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 83–87.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klyuev, V.V., Rezchikov, A.F., Bogomolov, A.S., Ukov, D.A., and Filimonyuk, L.Yu., Systems Approach to the Problem of Estimating Residual Resource in Human-Machine Systems, Kontrol. Diagnost., 2011, no. 8, pp. 9–13.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kushnikov, V.A., Rezchikov, A.F., and Tsvirkun, A.D., Sontrol in Man-Machine Systems with Automated Correction of Objectives, Meitan Kexun Jishu, 1998, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 168–175.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rezchikov, A., Dolinina, O., Kushnikov, V., Ivaschenko, V., Kachur, K., Bogomolov, A., and Filimonyuk, L., The Problem of a Human Factor in Aviation Transport Systems, in Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Computing, Technology and Engineering (ICCTE 2016), Singapore, 2016, pp. 16–20.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Novozhilov, G.V., Rezchikov, A.F., Neimark, M.S., Bogomolov, A.S., Tsesarskii, L.G., and Filimonyuk, L.Yu., The Problem of Critical Combinations of Events in the “Crew–Aircraft–Dispatcher” System, Obshcheross. Nauch.-Tekhn. J. “Polet,” 2015, no. 2, pp. 10–16.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Novozhilov, G.V., Rezchikov, A.F., Neimark, M.S., Bogomolov, A.S., Tsesarskii, L.G., and Filimonyuk, L.Yu., Human Factor in Aviation Transport Systems, Obshcheross. Nauch.-Tekhn. J. “Polet,” 2013, no. 5, pp. 3–10.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bogomolov, A.S. and Speranskii, D.V., On an Optimal Synchronizing Experiment with Linear Automata, J. Comput. Syst. Sci. Int., 2002, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 397–403.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Trahtman, A., Modifying the Upper Bound on the Length ofMinimal SynchronizingWord, Fundamentals Comput. Theory, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 2011, vol. 6914, pp. 173–180.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gill, A., Linear Sequential Circuits; Analysis, Synthesis, and Applications, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966. Translated under the title Lineinye posledovatel’nostnye mashiny, Moscow: Nauka, 1974.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    On Establishing the Aviation Rules “Order of Operation for Radio Communication in the Air Space of the Russian Federation.” Directive of the Russian Ministry of Transportation, September 26, 2012, no. 362.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. F. Rezchikov
    • 1
  • V. A. Kushnikov
    • 2
  • V. A. Ivashchenko
    • 2
  • A. S. Bogomolov
    • 3
  • L. Yu. Filimonyuk
    • 4
  1. 1.Trapeznikov Institute of Control SciencesRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Precision Mechanics and ControlRussian Academy of SciencesSaratovRussia
  3. 3.Chernyshevsky Saratov National Research UniversitySaratovRussia
  4. 4.Gagarin Saratov State Technical UniversitySaratovRussia

Personalised recommendations