Advertisement

Automation and Remote Control

, Volume 79, Issue 10, pp 1836–1853 | Cite as

Design of Organizational Structures in Large-Scale Projects of Digital Economy

  • F. I. Ereshko
  • N. I. Turko
  • A. D. Tsvirkun
  • A. A. Chursin
Problems of Optimization and Simulation at Control of Development of Large-Scale Systems
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

Consideration was given to using theoretical constructs of the decision making theory for analysis of the outlooks for development of the state-business partnership in the large Russian industry and infrastructure. The possibilities of formal description of the conceptual situation of the economic state-business partnership corresponding to the legal foundations the statebusiness were examined. Attention was mostly paid to the mechanisms for coordinations of the interests of state and business.

Keywords

state-private partnership state control federal law special investment contract infrastructure investments system analysis state and business interests 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Schwab, K., The Fourth Industrial Revolution, New York: Crown Business, 2016. Translated under the title Chetvertaya industrial’naya revolyutsiya, Moscow: Eksmo, 2016.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Upravlenie razvitiem krupnomashtabnykh sistem (Control of Development of Large-scale Systems), Tsvirkun, A.D., Ed., Moscow: Fizmatlit, 2015.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Varnavskii, V.G. and Tsvirkun, A.D., Control of Large Infrastructure Systems on the Basis of Concessions and Project Financing, in Control of Development of Large-scale Systems (Current Problems), Tsvirkun, A.D., Ed., Moscow: Fizmatlit, 2015, vol. 2, pp. 95–115.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Varnavskii V.G., Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe partnerstvo (State-Private Partnership) Moscow: IMEMO RAN, 2009, vol.2.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tsvirkun, A.D. and Akinfiev, V.K., Struktura mnogourovnevykh i krupnomasshtabnykh sistem. Sintez i planirovanie razvitiya (Structure of Multilevel and Large-scale Systems. Design and Planning of Development), Moscow: Nauka, 1993.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moiseev, N.N., Matematicheskie zadachi sistemnogo analiza (Mathematical Problems of System Analysis), Moscow: Nauka, 1981.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Germei’er, Yu.B., Igry s neprotivopolozhnymi interesami (Games with Noncontradictory Interests), Moscow: Nauka, 1976.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vatel’, I.A. and Ereshko, F.I., Matematika konflikta i sotrudnichestva (Mathematics of Conflict and Cooperation), Moscow: Znanie, 1973.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vatel’, I.A. and Ereshko, F.I., Games with Hierarchical Structure in Mathematical Encyclopaedia, Moscow: Sovetskaya Entsiklopediya, 1979, vol. 2, pp. 478–482.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ereshko, F.I., Mathematical Models and Methods of Making Coordinated Decisions in Active Hierarchical Systems, Doctoral (Engineering) Dissertation, Moscow: Inst. Probl. Upravlen., 1998.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gorelik, V.A., Gorelov, M.A., and Kononenko, A.F., Analiz konfliktnykh situatsii v sistemakh upravleniya (Analysis of Conflict Situations in the Control Systems), Moscow: Radio i Svyaz’, 1991.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kukushkin, N.S., Role of Mutual Information of Sides in the Games of Two Persons with Noncontradictory Interests, Zh. Vychisl. Mat. Mat. Fiz., 1972, no. 4, pp. 1029–1034.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moiseev, N.N., Hierarchical Structures and the Game Theory, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Tekh. Kibern., 1973, no. 6, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Burkov, V.N. and Novikov, D.A., Teoriya aktivnykh sistem. Sostoyanie i perspektivy (Theory of Active Systems. State-of-the-Art and Outlooks), Moscow: Sinteg, 1999.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Novikov, D.A., Teoriya upravleniya organizatsionnymi sistemami. Uchebnoe posobie (Theory of Control of Organization Systems. Textbook), Moscow: MPSI, 2005.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marshak, J. and Radner, R., Economic Theory of Teams, City New Haven–London: Yale Univ. Press. 1976.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moulin, H., Teoriya igr s primerami iz matematicheskoi ekonomiki (Game Theory with Examples from Mathematical Economy), Moscow: Mir, 1985.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tanaev, V.S. and Verina, L.F., Dekompozitsionnye podkhody k resheniyu zadach matematicheskogo programmirovaniya (Decompositional Approaches to Solution of the Problems of Mathematical Programming), Econ. Mat. Methods, 1975, vol. II, no. 6, pp. 1160–1172.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tsvirkun, A.D. and Akinfiev, V.K., Analiz investitsii, metody i instrumental’nye sredstva (Investment Analysis, Mehods and Instrumental Facilities), Moscow: Os’-89, 2009.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chursin, A.A. et al., Ekonomika kosmicheskoi deyatel’nosti (Economics of Space Activity), Raikunov, G.G., Ed., Moscow: Fizmatlit, 2013.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chursin, A.A., Teoreticheskie osnovy upravleniya konkurentosposobnost’yu. Teoriya i praktika: monografiya (Theoretical Fundamentals of Controlling Competitiveness, A Monograph), Moscow: Spektr, 2012.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Afanas’ev, M.V. and Chursin, A.A., Reformirovanie i razvitie raketno-kosmicheskoi promyshlennosti Rossii (metody, kontseptsiii i modeli) (Reforming and Development of the Russian Rocket-and-Space Industry (Methods, Concepts and Models), Moscow: Spektr, 2014.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Safronov, I.I., Kommersant, 2017, no. 33, p. 1. www.kommersant.ru/doc/3226509Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ereshko, F.I. and Turko, N.I., Procedures for Organization of the State-Private Partnership in Industrial Branches, Biznes v Zakone, Ekon.-Yurid. Zh., 2016, no. 6, pp. 49–56.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ereshko, F.I., Kulikov, S.A., Nasenkov, I.G., and Turko, N.I., State-Private Partnership in the Field of Development and Production of High-Tech Products; Methodological Problems and Possible Ways to Solve Them, Vestn. Akad. Voen. Nauk, 2013, no. 4 (45), pp. 140–149.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nasenkov, I.G. and Turko, N.I., Specific Features of Control Formation for Holding Company of the Environmemt of Oligopol Competition, Vestn. Akad. Voen. Nauk, 2011, no. 4(37).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ereshko, F.I., Decision Making about System Diversification, Proc. Syst. Anal. Inst. RAN, “Dynamics of Inhomogeneous Systems,” Moscow: LENAND, 2010, vol. 53(4), pp. 107–114.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Barkalov, S.A., Ereshko, F.I., and Kanaeva, N.A., Analysis of the Diversification Models, Sist. Upravlen. Inform. Technol., 2013, no. 3 (53), Moscow–Voronezh: Nauchnaya Kniga, 2013, pp. 24–32.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Burkova, I.V., A Method of Network Programming in Problem of Nonlinear Optimization, Autom. Remote Control, 2009, vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 1606–1612.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Burkov, V.N. and Burkova, I.V., Metod dikhotomicheskogo programmirovaniya v zadachakh diskretnoi optimizatsii (Method of Dichotomic Programming in the Problems of Discrete Optimization), Moscow: TSEMI RAN, 2003.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ereshko, F.I. and Zlobin, A.S., Algoritm tsentralizovannogo raspredeleniya resursov mezhdu aktivnymi podsistemami (Algorithm of Centralized Allocation of Resources Between Active Subsystems), Ekon. Mat. Meth., 1977, no. 4, pp. 703–713.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ereshko, F.I. and Zlobin, A.S., Mathematical Methods for the Analysis of Hierarchical Systems. II, in Numerical Methods for Solving Game-Theoretic, Equilibrium and Pareto Optimization Problems, Laxenburg: IIASA, 1984, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. I. Ereshko
    • 1
  • N. I. Turko
    • 2
  • A. D. Tsvirkun
    • 3
  • A. A. Chursin
    • 4
  1. 1.Dorodnicyn Computing CentreRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.State Corporation “Rostec,”Academy of Military SciencesMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Trapeznikov Institute of Control SciencesRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  4. 4.Peoples’ Friendship University (RUDN University)MoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations