Advertisement

Automation and Remote Control

, Volume 78, Issue 5, pp 902–923 | Cite as

Models of data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis in the efficiency assessment of universities

  • F. T. AleskerovEmail author
  • V. Yu. Belousova
  • V. V. Petrushchenko
Control Sciences
  • 160 Downloads

Abstract

This paper systematizes the empirical results on efficiency concepts applied to higher education institutions, data envelopment analysis (DEA) adjusted to heterogeneous samples, inputs and outputs chosen for these institutions and factors tended to make universities efficient. Special attention is paid to the consistency of results yielded by different models.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    OECD. Performance-based Funding for Public Research in Tertiary Education Institutions: Workshop Proceedings, Paris, 2010.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Garcia-Valderrama, T. and Groot, T., Research Quality and Efficiency—An Analysis of Assessments and Management Issues in Dutch Economics and Business Research Programs, Res. Policy, 2006, no. 35, pp. 1362–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Titova, N.L., Strategii razvitiya rossiiskikh vuzov: otvety na novye vyzovy (Development Strategies of Russian Universities: Responses to the New Challenges), Moscow: MAKS Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Charnes, A., Cooper, W., and Rhodes, E., Measuring the Efficiency of Decision-Making Units, Eur. J. Operat. Res., 1978, no. 2, pp. 429–444.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Charnes, A. and Cooper, W., Programming with Linear Fractional Functional Cooper, Naval Res. Logist., 1962, no. 9, pp. 181–186.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., and Cooper, W.W., Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis, Manage. Sci., 1984, no. 30, pp. 1078–1092.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Podinovski, V., Bridging the Gap Between the Constant and Variable Returns-to-Scale Models: Selective Proportionality in Data Envelopment Analysis, J. Operat. Res. Soc., 2004, no. 55, pp. 265–276.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Podinovski, V., The Explicit Role ofWeight Bounds in Models of Data Envelopment Analysis, J. Operat. Res. Soc., 2005, no. 56, pp. 1408–1418.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Friedman, L. and Sinuany-Stern, Z., Scaling Units via the Canonical Correlation Analysis in the DEA Context, Eur. J. Operat. Res., 1997, no. 100, pp. 629–637.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aparicio, J., Ruiz, J., and Sirvent, I., Closest Targets and Minimum Distance to the Pareto-Efficient Frontier in DEA, J. Product. Anal., 2007, no. 28, pp. 209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ruiz, J., Segura, J., and Sirvent, I., Benchmarking and Target Setting with Expert Preferences: An Application to the Evaluation of Educational Performance of Spanish Universities, Eur. J. Operat. Res., 2015, no. 242, pp. 594–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mattos, E., Rocha, F., and Zoghbi, A., Education Production Efficiency: Evidence from Brazilian Universities, Econom. Model., 2013, no. 31, pp. 94–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Biggeri, L., Laureti, T., and Secondi, L., Measuring the Efficiency of Teaching Activities in Italian Universities: An Information Theoretic Approach, Econom. Educat. Rev., 2014, no. 42, pp. 147–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Aigner, D., Lovell, C., and Schmidt, P., Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Functions, J. Econometrics, 1977, no. 6, pp. 21–37.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Coelli, T., Rao, D., O’Donnell, C., and Battese, G., An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, New York: Springer, 2005.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Johnes, G. and Johnes, J., Higher Education Institutions’ Costs and Efficiency: Taking the Decomposition a Further Step, Econom. Educat. Rev., 2009, no. 28, pp. 107–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Glass, J., McKillop, D., and Hyndman, N., Efficiency in the Provision of University Teaching and Research: An Empirical Analysis of UK Universities, J. Appl. Econometrics, 1995, no. 10, pp. 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stevens, P., A Stochastic Frontier Analysis of English and Welsh Universities, Educat. Econom., 2005, no. 13, pp. 355–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Battese, G. and Coelli, T., A Model for Technical Efficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data, Empirical Econom., 1995, no. 20, pp. 325–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Allen, D., Flegg, A., Field, K., and Thurlow, T., Measuring the Efficiency and Productivity of British Universities: An Application of DEA and the Malmquist Approach, 2004. http://carecon.org.uk/DPs/0304.pdfGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Allen, D.O. and Flegg, A.T., Does Expansion Cause Congestion? The Case of the Older British Universities, 1994–2004, Educat. Econom., 2007, no. 15, pp. 75–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., and Zhongyang, Z., Productivity Growth, Technical Progress and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries, Am. Econom. Rev., 1994, no. 84, pp. 66–83.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Johnes, J., Efficiency and Productivity Change in the English Higher Education Sector from 1996/97 to 2004/5, Manchester School, 2008, no. 76, pp. 653–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Johnes, J., Johnes, G., Kortelainen, M., and Thanassoulis, E., Costs and Efficiency of Higher Education Institutions in England: A DEA Analysis, J. Operat. Res. Soc., 2011, no. 62, pp. 1282–1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lee, B.L. and Worthington, A.C., Efficiency, Technology and Productive Change in Australian Universities, 1998–2003, Econom. Educat. Rev., 2008, no. 27, pp. 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kempkes, G. and Pohl, C., The Efficiency of German Universities—Some Evidence from Nonparametric and Parametric Methods, Appl. Econom., 2010, no. 42, pp. 2063–2079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Agasisti, T. and Dal Bianco, A., Reforming the University Sector: Effects of Teaching Efficiency— Evidence from Italy, Higher Educat., 2009, no. 57, pp. 477–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Avkiran, N.K., Investigating Technical and Scale Efficiencies of Australian Universities Through Data Envelopment Analysis, Socio-Economic Planning Sci., 2001, no. 35, pp. 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Johnes, J., Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Application to the Measurement of Efficiency in Higher Education, Econom. Educat. Rev., 2006, no. 25, pp. 273–288.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Charnes, A., Cooper, W., and Rhodes, E., Evaluating Program and Managerial Efficiency: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Program Follow Through, Manage. Sci., 1981, no. 27, pp. 668–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Warning, S., Performance Differences in German Higher Education: Empirical Analysis of Strategic Groups, Rev. Industr. Organization, 2004, no. 24, pp. 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Abankina, I.V., Aleskerov, F.T., Belousova, V.Yu., et al., Evaluating the Performance of Universities Using Data Envelopment Analysis, Vopr. Obrazov., 2013, no. 2, pp. 5–38.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Abbott, M. and Doucouliagos, C., The Efficiency of Australian Universities: A Data Envelopment Analysis, Econom. Educat. Rev., 2003, no. 22, pp. 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Athanassopoulos, A.D. and Shale, E., Assessing the Comparative Efficiency of Higher Education Institutions in the UK by the Means of Data Envelopment Analysis, Educat. Econom., 1997, no. 5, pp. 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Banker, R.D. and Morey, R.C., Use of Categorical Variables in Data Envelopment Analysis, Manage. Sci., 1986, no. 32, pp. 1613–1627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pastor, T., Ruiz, L., and Sirvent, I., A Statistical Test for Nested Radial DEA Models, Operat. Res., 2002, no. 50, pp. 728–735.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Beasley, J., Determining Teaching and Research Efficiencies, J. Operat. Res. Soc., 1995, no. 46, pp. 441–452.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Aleskerov, F. and Petrushchenko, V., An Approach to DEA for Heterogeneous Samples, in Modelling, Computation and Optimization in Information Systems and Management Sciences, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 360, Le Thi, H.A. et al., Eds., Switzerland: Springer, 2015, pp. 15–21.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cinar, Y., Research and Teaching Efficiencies of Turkish Universities with Heterogeneity Considerations: Application of “Multi-Activity DEA” and “DEA by Sequential Exclusion of Alternatives’ Models,” HSE WP7/2013/04, Moscow, 2013.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Abankina, I.V., Aleskerov, F.T., Belousova, V.Yu., et al., Performance-Based Typology of Universities: Evidence from Russia, Working Papers by NRU Higher School of Economics, Series WP BRP “Science, Technology and Innovation,” N WP BRP 33/STI/2015, Moscow, 2015.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cook, W.D. and Zhu, D., Classifying Inputs and Outputs in Data Envelopment Analysis, Eur. J. Operat. Res., 2007, no. 180, pp. 692–699.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Katharakis, G. and Katharaki, M., A Comparative Assessment of Greek Universities’ Efficiency Using Quantitative Analysis, Int. J. Educat. Res., 2010, no. 49, pp. 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hüfner, K., Accountability in Higher Education, in International Higher Education: An Encyclopedia, Altbach, P., Ed., New York: Garland, 1991, no. 1, pp. 47–58.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Johnes, J. and Yu, L., Measuring the Research Performance of Chinese Higher Education Institutions Using Data Envelopment Analysis, China Econom. Rev., 2008, no. 19, pp. 679–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Korhonen, P., Tainio, R., and Wallenius, J., Value Efficiency Analysis of Academic Research, Eur. J. Operat. Res., 2001, no. 130, pp. 121–132.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Breu, T.M. and Raab, R.L., Efficiency and Perceived Quality of the Nation’s “Top 25” National Universities and National Liberal Arts Colleges: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Higher Education, Socio-Economic Planning Sci., 1994, no. 28, pp. 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Lafuente, E., and Sole, F., The Pursuit of Knowledge Transfer Activities: An Efficiency Analysis of Spanish Universities, J. Business Res., 2013, no. 66, pp. 2051–2059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Abankina, I.V., Aleskerov, F.T., Belousova, V.Yu., et al., University Efficiency Evaluation with Using Its Reputational Component, in Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Applied Operational Research, Bangkok, 2012, pp. 244–253.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Abankina, I.V., Abankina, T.V., and Nikolaenko, E.A., The Economic Situation in Universities in Terms of Budget Reform, Improving the Autonomy and the Introduction of the USE, Moscow: HSE, 2010.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Cherchye, L. and Vanden Abeele, P., On Research Efficiency: A Micro-Analysis of Dutch University Research in Economics and Business Management, Res. Policy, 2005, no. 34, pp. 495–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Koenker, R., Quantile Regression, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    McMillan, M. and Wing, H.C., University Efficiency: A Comparison and Consolidation of Results from Stochastic and Non-stochastic Methods, Educat. Econom., 2006, no. 14, pp. 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Berger, A.N. and Humphrey, D.B., Efficiency of Financial Institutions: International Survey and Directions for Future Research, Eur. J. Operat. Res., 1997, no. 98, pp. 175–212.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Petrushchenko, V.V., Heterogeneity in Data Envelopment Analysis, Probl. Upravlen., 2013, no. 5, pp. 2–11.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Bauer, P.W., Berger, A.N., Ferrier, G.D., and Humphrey, D.B., Consistency Conditions for Regulatory Analysis of Financial Institutions: A Comparison of Frontier Efficiency Methods, J. Econom. Business, 1998, no. 50, pp. 85–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. T. Aleskerov
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • V. Yu. Belousova
    • 1
  • V. V. Petrushchenko
    • 1
  1. 1.Higher School of Economics (National Research University)MoscowRussia
  2. 2.Trapeznikov Institute of Control SciencesRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations