Automation and Remote Control

, Volume 73, Issue 11, pp 1765–1783 | Cite as

Approximate consensus in the dynamic stochastic network with incomplete information and measurement delays

  • N. O. Amelina
  • A. L. Fradkov
Topical Issue


Consideration was given to the problem of achieving an approximate consensus in the decentralized stochastic dynamic network under incomplete information about the current states of the nodes, measurement delay, and variable structure of links. Solution was based on the protocol of local voting with nonvanishing steps. It was proposed to analyze dynamics of the closed network with the use of the method of averaged models which was extended to the systems with measurement delays. This method enables one to establish good analytical estimates of the permissible length of the step providing the desired accuracy of consensus and appreciably reduce the computational burden of simulation. The results obtained were applied to the analysis of the dynamics of the system of balancing the computer network loading.


Remote Control Span Tree Queue Length Multiagent System Mobile Agent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Fax, A. and Murray, R.M., Information Flow and Cooperative Control of Vehicle Formations, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 2004, vol. 49, pp. 1465–1476.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Toner, J. and Tu, Y., Flocks, Herds, and Schools: A Quantitative Theory of Flocking, Phys. Rev. E, 1998, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 4828–4858.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cortes, J. and Bullo, F., Coordination and Geometric Optimization via Distributed Dynamical Systems, SIAM J. Control Optim., 2005, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 1543–1574.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Paganini, F., Doyle, J., and Low, S., Scalable Laws for Stable Network Congestion Control, in Proc. 40th IEEE Conf. Decision Control, Orlando, 2001, vol. 1, pp. 185–190.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Antal, C., Granichin, O., and Levi, S., Adaptive Autonomous Soaring of Multiple UAVs Using SPSA, in Proc. 49th IEEE CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA, December 15–17, 2010, pp. 3656–3661.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jadbabaie, A., Lin, J., and Morse, A.S., Coordination of Groups of Mobile Autonomous Agents Using Nearest Neighbor Rules, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 2003, vol. 48, pp. 988–1000.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Olfati-Saber, R. and Murray, R.M., Consensus Problems in Networks of AgentsWith Switching Topology and Time-Delays, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 2004, vol. 49, pp. 1520–1533.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ren, W. and Beard, R.W., Consensus Seeking in Multiagent Systems under Dynamically Changing Interaction Topologies, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 2005, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 655–661.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huang, M., Stochastic Approximation for Consensus with General Time-Varying Weight Matrices, in Proc. 49th IEEE CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA, December 2010, pp. 7449–7454.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Agaev, R.P. and Chebotarev, P.Yu., Convergence and Stability in the Problems of Coordination of Characterstics (Review of the Basic Results), Upravlen. Bol’shimi Sist., 2010, vol. 30.1, pp. 470–505.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ren, W. and Beard, R.W., Distributed Consensus in Multi-Vehicle Cooperative Control, Communication and Control Engineering Series, New York: Springer, 2007.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tsitsiklis, J.N., Bertsekas, D.P., and Athans, M., Distributed Asynchronous Deterministic and Stochastic Gradient Optimization Algorithms, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 1986, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 803–812.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huang, M. and Manton, J.H., Coordination and Consensus of Networked Agents with Noisy Measurements: Stochastic Algorithms and Asymptotic Behavior, SIAM J. Control Optim., 2009, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 134–161.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kar, S. and Moura, J.M.F., Distributed Consensus Algorithms in Sensor Networks with Imperfect Communication: Link Failures and Channel Noise, IEEE Trans. Signal Proc., 2009, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 355–369.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li, T. and Zhang, J.-F., Mean Square Average-Consensus under Measurement Noises and Fixed Topologies, Automatica, 2009, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 1929–1936.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rajagopal, R. and Wainwright, M.J., Network-based Consensus Averaging with General Noisy Channels, IEEE Trans. Signal Proc., 2011, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 373–385.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Granichin, O., Vakhitov, A., and Vlasov, V., Adaptive Control of SISO Plant with Time-Varying Coefficients Based on Random Test Perturbation, in Proc. 2010 Am. Control Conf., Baltimore, MD, USA, June 30–July 2, 2010, pp. 4004–4009.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vakhitov, A.T., Granichin, O.N., and Gurevich, L.S., Algorithm for Stochastic Approximation with Trial Input Perturbation in the Nonstationary Problem of Optimization, Autom. Remote Control, 2009, vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 1827–1836.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Granichin, O., Gurevich, L., and Vakhitov, A., Discrete-time Minimum Tracking Based on Stochastic Approximation Algorithm with Randomized Differences, in Proc. Combined 48th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control and 28th Chinese Control Conf., December 16–18, 2009, Shanghai, P.R. China, pp. 5763–5767.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Borkar, V.S., Stochastic Approximation: A Dynamical Systems Viewpoint, New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Granichin, O.N., Stochastic Optimization and System Programming, Stokh. Optim. Informat., 2010, vol. 6, pp. 3–44.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vakhitov, A.T., Granichin, O.N., and Pan’shenskov, M.A., Methods of Estimation of the Data Transmission Rate in Grid, Neirokomp’yutery: Razrabotka, Primenenie, 2009, no. 11, pp. 45–52.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Amelina, N.O., Balancing Node Loading in the Decentralized Computer Network under Incomplete Information, Neirokomp’yutery: Razrabotka, Primenenie, 2001, no. 6, pp. 56–63.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Amelina, N.O., Multiagent Technologies, Adaptation, Self-Organization, Achieving Consensus, Stokh. Optim. Informat., 2011, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 149–185.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Amelina, N.O. and Fradkov, A.L., Method of Averaged Models in the Problem of Achieving Consensus, Stokh. Optim. Informat., 2012, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 3–39.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Derevitskii, D.P. and Fradkov, A.L., TwoModels for Analysis of Dynamics of the Adaptation Algorithms, Autom. Remote Control, 1974, vol. 35, no. 1, part 1, pp. 59–67.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Derevitskii, D.P. and Fradkov, A.L., Prikladnaya teoriya diskretnykh adaptivnykh sistem upravleniya (Applied Theory of the Discrete Adaptive Control Systems), Moscow: Nauka, 1981.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ljung, L., Analysis of Recursive Stochastic Algorithms, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 1977, no. 4, pp. 551–575.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gerencser, L., A Representation Theorem for the Error of Recursive Estimators, SIAM J. Control Optim., 2006, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 2123–2188.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kushner, H.J., Approximation and Weak Convergence Methods for Random Processes, with Application to Stochastic Systems Theory, Boston: MIT Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kushner, H.J. and Clark, D.S., Stochastic Approximation Methods for Constrained and Unconstrained Systems, New York: Springer, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ljung, L. and Soderstrom, T., Theory and Practice of Recursive Identification, Boston: MIT Press, 1983.MATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fradkov, A.L., Continuous-time Averaged Models of Discrete-Time Stochastic Systems: Survey and Open Problems, in Proc. IEEE CDC-50, 2011, Orlando, USA, pp. 2076–2081.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Friedrich, T.A., Sauerwald, T.B., and Vilenchik, D.C., Smoothed Analysis of Balancing Networks, Random Struct. Algorithms, 2011, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 115–138.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Li, H., Load Balancing Algorithm for Heterogeneous P2P Systems Based on Mobile Agent, in Proc. ICEICE 2011, 2011, pp. 1446–1449.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kechadi, M.-T. and Savvas, I.K., Dynamic Task Scheduling for Irregular Network Topologies, Parallel Comput., 2005, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 757–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Katueva, Ya.V., Balancing Load of Nonsymmetrical Computer System at Handling the Tasks of Stochastic Estimation, Informatika Sist. Upravlen., 2006, no. 2(12), pp. 88–93.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kostenetskii, P.S., Lepikhov, A.V., and Sokolinskii, L.V., Technologies of Parallel Database Systems for Hierarchical Multiprocessor Environments, Autom. Remote Control, 2007, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 847–860.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Li, Y. and Lan, Z., A Survey of Load Balancing in Grid Computing, in Proc. Int. Symp. Comput. Inf. Sci. (CIS04), 2004, Shanghai, China, pp. 280–285.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gilly, K., Juiz, C., and Puigjaner, R., An Up-To-Date Survey in Web Load Balancing, World Wide Web, 2011, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 105–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sim, K.M. and Sun, W.H., Ant Colony Optimization for Routing and Load-Balancing: Survey and New Directions, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man, Cybern.-Part A: Syst. Humans, 2003, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 560–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Dzhunusov, I.A. and Fradkov, A.L., Synchronization in Networks of Linear Agents with Output Feedbacks, Autom. Remote Control, 2011, vol. 72, no. 8, pp. 1615–1627.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Networks of Interacting Machines: Production Organization in Complex Industrial Systems and Biological Cells, Armbruster, D., Mikhailov, A.S., and Kaneko, K., Eds., World Scientific: Singapore, 2005.MATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Glashenko, A., Inozemtzev, S., Grachev, I., and Skobelev, P., Magenta Technology: Case Studies of Magenta i-Scheduler for Road Transportation, in Proc. Int. Conf. Autonom. Agents Multi Agent Syst. (AAMAS-6), Hawaii, 2007, pp. 1385–1392.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Amelina, N., Lada, A., Maiorov, I., et al., Study of the Models of Freight Traffic Organization with the Use of Multiagent System of Adaptive Realtime Planning of Trucks, Probl. Upravlen., 2011, no. 6, pp. 31–37.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gikhman, I.I. and Skorokhod, A.V., Stokhasticheskie differentsial’nye uravneniya (Stochastic Differential Equations), Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1968.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bernshtein, S.N., Stokhasticheskie uravneniya v konechnykh raznostyakh i stokhastickie differentsial’nye uravneniya (Stochastic Finite-ifferences Equations and Stochastic Differential Equations), Moscow: Nauka, 1964, vol. 4, pp. 484–542.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. O. Amelina
    • 1
  • A. L. Fradkov
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.State UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Problems of Mechanical EngineeringSt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations