Biooptical characteristics of the surface layer of the Baltic, Norwegian, and Barents seas in summer 2014–2016 from shipboard and satellite data
- 43 Downloads
The article presents the results of shipboard and satellite measurements in the surface layer of the Baltic, Norwegian, and Barents seas during legs from the Baltic to the White Sea in June–August 2014–2016. Special attention is paid to marine phytoplankton blooms of cyanobacteria in the Baltic Sea and coccolithophores in the Barents Sea. No blooms were found in the Norwegian Sea. The efficiency of combined application of in situ and satellite optical methods for studying the parameters of phytoplankton blooms is shown.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.V. A. Artemiev, V. I. Burenkov, M. I. Vortman, A. V. Grigoriev, O. V. Kopelevich, and A. N. Khrapko, “Sea-truth measurements of ocean color: a new floating spectroradiometer and its metrology,” Oceanology (Engl. Transl.) 40, 139–145 (2000).Google Scholar
- 2.V. A. Artemiev, V. R. Taskaev, V. I. Burenkov, and A. V. Grigoriev, “Universal portative device to measure the vertical distribution of light decay,” in Comprehensive Studies of the World Ocean: Meridian Project (Nauka, Moscow, 2008), pp. 165–172.Google Scholar
- 3.Yu. A. Goldin, A. V. Shatravin, V. A. Levchenko, Yu. I. Ventscut, B. A. Gureev, and O. V. Kopelevich, “Spatial variability of seawater fluorescence intensity in the Western Black Sea,” Fundam. Prikl. Gidrofiz. 7 (1), 17–26 (2015).Google Scholar
- 4.N. V. Evtushenko and S. V. Sheberstov, “Use of MODIS-Aqua data for analysis of blooming cycles of phytoplankton in the Baltic Sea,” Sovrem. Probl. Distantsionnogo Zondirovaniya Zemli Kosmosa 13 (3), 114–124 (2016).Google Scholar
- 5.O. V. Kopelevich, V. I. Burenkov, S. V. Vasyulya, and S. V. Sheberstov, “Indication of the coccolithophore blooms using satellite data,” Sovrem. Probl. Distantsionnogo Zondirovaniya Zemli Kosmosa 9 (5), 241–250 (2012).Google Scholar
- 6.M. E. Li, E. B. Shibanov, O. V. Martynov, and E. N. Korchemkina, “Analysis of admixture concentrations in the sea water by upwelling radiation spectrum,” Morsk. Gidrofiz. Zh. 186 (6), 17–33 (2015).Google Scholar
- 7.S. I. Pogosyan, A. M. Durgaryan, I. V. Konyukhov, O. B. Chivkunova, and M. N. Merzlyak, “Absorption spectroscopy of microalgae, cyanobacteria, and dissolved organic matter: measurements in an integrating sphere cavity,” Oceanology (Engl. Transl.) 49, 866–871 (2009).Google Scholar
- 8.T. V. Bukanova, S. V. Vazyulia, O. V. Kopelevich, et al., “Regional bio-optical algorithms for retrieval of Chl a and TSM concentrations from satellite ocean color data in the South-Eastern Baltic,” Proceedings of VI International Conf. “Current Problems in Optics of the Natural Waters” (ONW’2011) (Nauka, St. Petersburg, 2011), pp. 136–139.Google Scholar
- 9.M. Darecki, D. Ficek, A. Krezel, et al., “Algorithms for the remote sensing of the Baltic ecosystem (DESAMBEM). Part 2: Empirical validation,” Oceanologia 50 (4), 509–538 (2008).Google Scholar
- 12.S. V. Sheberstov and E. A. Lukyanova, “A system for acquisition, processing, and storage of satellite and field biooptical data,” Proceedings of IV International Conf. “Current Problems in Optics of Natural Waters” (Nizhny Novgorod, 2007), pp. 179–183.Google Scholar
- 14.K. Sivonen, K. Kononen, W. Carmichael, et al., “Occurrence of the hepatotoxic cyanobacterium Nodularia spumigena in the Baltic Sea and structure of the toxin,” Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55 (8), 1990–1995 (1989).Google Scholar